Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Euler characteristic of the structure sheaf is one minus the genus

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let X be a compact Riemann surface of topological genus g (Riemann surfaces and holomorphic atlases, Genus and Euler characteristic of a compact Riemann surface, Topological classification of compact Riemann surfaces). Identify OX(0) with the structure sheaf OX by the canonical trivialization (Divisors, principal divisors and canonical divisors on a Riemann surface, The holomorphic line bundle associated to a divisor). Use the finite-dimensionality and notation χ(OX)=ℓ(0)−i(0) from Finite-dimensionality of the cohomology of a divisor on a compact Riemann surface.

  1. The global holomorphic functions on X are exactly the constants, so ℓ(0)=dim⁡H0(X,OX)=1.

  2. For each F∈{R,C}, dim⁡FHsing1(X;F)=dim⁡FHdR1(X;F)=2g,dim⁡FHsing2(X;F)=dim⁡FHdR2(X;F)=1. Integration identifies HdR2(X;R) with R. The constant sheaf CX has dim⁡CH1(X,CX)=2g and dim⁡CH2(X,CX)=1.

  3. Let K=Λ1,0T∗X be the canonical holomorphic line bundle and let ΩX1 be its sheaf of holomorphic sections (Holomorphic line bundles and meromorphic sections on a Riemann surface). The holomorphic de Rham sequence 0⟶CX⟶OX→ d ΩX1⟶0 is exact.

  4. The induced long exact sequence and harmonic-star duality give dim⁡H1(X,OX)=g,χ(OX)=1−g.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC, a compact Riemann surface X of topological genus g, and the compatible metrics on X, OX, and K required by the Hodge inputs.

[F1]

Full AC is used by the surface-classification, universal-coefficient, derived-sheaf-cohomology, long-exact-sequence, finiteness, and Hodge inputs. Its consequences ACω and DC supply the hypotheses of the real de Rham comparison and the smooth-module acyclicity argument (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), AC implies DC implies countable choice).

[F2]

The genus g is topological. For g≥1, the polygonal model has one vertex, 2g one-cells, and one two-cell attached by ∏i=1gaibiai−1bi−1; for g=0, the model is S2 (Genus and Euler characteristic of a compact Riemann surface, Topological classification of compact Riemann surfaces, Polygonal schemas and paired boundary edges).

[F3]

With coefficients in a field F, for g≥1 the cellular chain groups are C2=F, C1=F2g, C0=F, and both boundary maps vanish: each one-cell begins and ends at the sole vertex, and each generator has exponent sum zero in the attaching commutator word. For g=0, the sphere's CW model has one zero-cell and one two-cell, with zero boundary maps. Cellular homology computes singular homology (Cellular homology, Cellular homology computes singular homology).

[F4]

For F=R or C, the singular chain complex C∗(X;F) is free over the PID F and its dual cochain complex is the singular cochain complex with coefficients in F. The universal-coefficient exact sequence has zero Ext term because every F-module is free, so Hsingq(X;F)≅Hom⁡F(Hq(X;F),F) (Singular simplices and singular chain groups with coefficients, Singular cochain complex with coefficients, The universal coefficient theorem for cohomology over a PID).

[F5]

Under ACω, the real de Rham comparison identifies real de Rham cohomology with continuous real singular cohomology. Integration identifies top-degree real de Rham cohomology of a closed connected oriented surface with R (De rham cohomology, De Rham vector-space comparison with continuous singular cohomology, Top de Rham cohomology of a closed connected oriented manifold is real).

[F6]

Complex-valued smooth forms are the complexification of real-valued smooth forms. Since the exterior derivative is real-linear, kernels, images, and cohomology commute with this scalar extension by the unique real-plus-imaginary decomposition.

[F7]

Closed smooth forms of positive degree are locally exact (Closed differential forms are locally exact).

[F8]

The sheaves of smooth complex-valued k-forms are modules over the sheaf of real smooth functions; under full AC they are acyclic in positive sheaf-cohomology degrees (A smooth differential k-form, Sheaves of smooth-function modules are cohomologically acyclic).

[F9]

The constant sheaf CX is the sheaf of locally constant complex-valued functions (The constant sheaf is the sheaf of locally constant functions).

[F10]

Sheaf-sequence exactness is stalkwise, and a short exact sequence of sheaves gives a long exact sequence in sheaf cohomology (Exact sequences of sheaves, A sequence of abelian sheaves is exact exactly when it is exact on every stalk, Long exact sequence of sheaf cohomology).

[F11]

In a holomorphic coordinate, the coordinate formula for d and the Cauchy–Riemann equations give dF=F′(z) dz for a holomorphic function F. Such functions have local holomorphic primitives, and a holomorphic function with zero derivative on a connected domain is constant (The exterior derivative of a function is its differential, Complex differentiability is equivalent to real total differentiability together with a complex-linear derivative, with ∂zˉf=0, or with the Cauchy–Riemann equations, Every complex analytic function has a primitive on a neighbourhood of each point, A holomorphic function with zero derivative on a domain is constant).

[F12]

A holomorphic atlas gives the underlying smooth surface, and K=Λ1,0T∗X is its canonical holomorphic line bundle. Compatible metrics on X and on each holomorphic line bundle exist by averaging smooth real metrics with the complex structures; this existence uses ACω, supplied by full AC (Riemann surfaces and holomorphic atlases, Holomorphic functions are real analytic and smooth in their two real coordinates, Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts, Holomorphic line bundles and meromorphic sections on a Riemann surface, Hermitian metric and L2 pairing on a compact Riemann surface).

[F13]

The global holomorphic sections and degree-one sheaf cohomology of OX(D) are finite-dimensional, and χ(OX(D))=ℓ(D)−i(D) (Finite-dimensionality of the cohomology of a divisor on a compact Riemann surface).

[F14]

The global Dolbeault resolution identifies sheaf cohomology with smooth Dolbeault cohomology in degrees 0,1 and gives Hq(X,OX(E))=0 for q≥2, without a finite-cover hypothesis (Cech--Dolbeault comparison for holomorphic line bundles on a compact Riemann surface).

[F15]

For a holomorphic Hermitian line bundle G on compact X, the Dolbeault groups are finite-dimensional with unique harmonic representatives, and the perfect complex-bilinear Hodge pairing gives H0,1(X,G)∗≅H0(X,K⊗G∗). In particular, for G=OX and G=K, their dual holomorphic spaces are H0(X,K) and H0(X,OX) respectively (Dolbeault cohomology of a compact riemann surface is finite dimensional, Harmonic star duality for line bundle valued dolbeault cohomology).

[F16]

The zero-divisor bundle is canonically trivial, identifying OX(0) with the structure sheaf OX (Divisors, principal divisors and canonical divisors on a Riemann surface, The holomorphic line bundle associated to a divisor).

[F17]

The local maximum-modulus principle says that if the modulus of a holomorphic function on a domain has an interior local maximum, then the function is constant (Local maximum modulus principle).

Proof

The proof computes the constant-sheaf groups from an acyclic smooth de Rham resolution and then uses the holomorphic de Rham sequence. The smooth-form sheaves are acyclic modules; they are not asserted to be flasque.

1.1F13F16F17given

Let f∈H0(X,OX). Compactness makes ∣f∣ attain a maximum, and the local maximum-modulus principle in [F17] on the connected surface makes f constant. Conversely every constant is holomorphic, so ℓ(0)=dim⁡H0(X,OX)=1 by [F13] and [F16].

1.2F1F2F3F4F5F6givenalgebra

Fix F∈{R,C}. If g≥1, the cellular groups and zero differentials in [F3] give H1(X;F)=F2g and H2(X;F)=F. If g=0, the sphere cell model in [F3] gives H1(X;F)=0 and H2(X;F)=F, again the same formulas with 2g=0. Applying [F4] over the field F yields dim⁡FHsing1(X;F)=2g and dim⁡FHsing2(X;F)=1. The real comparison in [F5] gives dim⁡RHdR1(X;R)=2g, while integration gives HdR2(X;R)≅R. Complexifying the real de Rham complex and using [F6] gives the complex de Rham dimensions.

1.3F9F10F11F12given

In a holomorphic coordinate, [F11] gives dF=F′(z) dz, so the kernel sheaf of d:OX→ΩX1 is locally constant by the zero-derivative assertion in [F11]. Every holomorphic 1-form is locally a(z) dz with a holomorphic, and [F11] supplies a local holomorphic primitive of a, making d:OX→ΩX1 surjective on stalks. With the inclusion of constants, stalkwise exactness [F10] proves the holomorphic de Rham sequence in statement 3.

2.1F1F7F8F9F10F12step 1.2algebra

Let ECk be the sheaf of smooth complex-valued k-forms on the smooth surface from [F12] and put ZC1:=ker⁡(d:EC1→EC2). On a connected coordinate disk, ker⁡(d:EC0→EC1)=CX because a smooth function with zero differential is constant along line segments. The first sequence 0→CX→EC0→ZC1→0 is stalkwise exact by this kernel calculation and [F7]. Every smooth 2-form is closed by dimension, so [F7] also makes EC1→EC2 surjective on stalks; by definition its kernel is ZC1. Thus 0→ZC1→EC1→EC2→0 is stalkwise exact. Both sequences are exact by [F10]. The smooth-form terms are acyclic by [F8], so their long exact sequences identify H1(X,CX) with closed complex 1-forms modulo exact ones and H2(X,CX) with complex 2-forms modulo exact ones. Step 1.2 gives their dimensions 2g and 1.

3.1F1F9F10F12F13F14F15step 1.1step 2.1step 1.3algebra∎

Apply the sheaf-cohomology long exact sequence [F10] to statement 3. Since H0(X,CX)=C by connectedness and [F9], the map H0(X,CX)→H0(X,OX) is the identity by step 1.1; also H2(X,OX)=0 by [F14]. The resulting exact segment is 0→H0(X,ΩX1)→H1(X,CX)→H1(X,OX)→H1(X,ΩX1)→H2(X,CX)→0. Set h:=dim⁡H1(X,OX), finite by [F13]. The Čech–Dolbeault comparison in [F14] identifies the sheaf groups in degrees 0,1 with Dolbeault groups for the trivial bundle and K. With the supplied compatible metrics in [F12], apply [F15] to the trivial bundle and K; all terms are finite-dimensional, dim⁡H0(X,ΩX1)=h, and dim⁡H1(X,ΩX1)=dim⁡H0(X,OX)=1. Alternating dimensions, using [F9] and step 2.1, give h−2g+h−1+1=0, hence h=g. By step 1.1 and [F13], χ(OX)=ℓ(0)−i(0)=1−g.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

223 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources