How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every forest-free graph has a linear anticomplete pair or a linear-degree vertex
Statement
For every forest , there exists a real constant such that every finite -free graph with satisfies at least one of the following:
- some vertex of has degree at least ;
- there exist disjoint sets with and anticomplete to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A forest and a finite -free graph with .
For every forest , the source theorem supplies a real constant such that every finite -free graph on at least two vertices has a vertex of degree at least or has two disjoint anticomplete sets with
Proof
By [F1], choose the constant attached to the forest . For the given graph , the same source theorem gives at least one of the two alternatives in the Statement.
Therefore has the required property for all finite -free graphs with at least two vertices.
Depends on
- $H$-free and $\mathcal F$-free graphs under the induced-subgraph convention
- Trees, forests, leaves and isolated vertices
- Adjacency, incidence, open and closed neighbourhoods, vertex degree, minimum degree and maximum degree
- Edges between disjoint vertex sets; complete, anticomplete, pure and mixed pairs
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Maria Chudnovsky, Alex Scott, Paul Seymour, and Sophie Spirkl, Pure pairs. I. Trees and linear anticomplete pairs, statement 1.4 (standard reference, not scraped)