How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Expected spectral error for real and normalized complex Gaussian range finders
Statement
Assume Countable Choice for the finite-dimensional Gaussian probability law. Let be fixed, where or . Let , , , and draw with iid standard real entries if or normalized complex entries if . If is an orthonormal basis of , then This preserves the normalized-complex convention .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice for the finite Gaussian law, and the fixed finite matrix and the real or normalized-complex Gaussian draw under the stated constraints.
The real-field statement with the displayed constants, for , , and , is proved in Expected spectral error of the real Gaussian range finder.
The normalized-complex range finder, with the same fixed-matrix, dimension, variance-one Gaussian, and Countable Choice hypotheses, satisfies the displayed expected-error bound (Direct expected spectral bound for the normalized complex range finder).
Standard real and normalized complex Gaussian matrix laws: real entries are standard Gaussian and complex entries are , with ; the finite-dimensional laws are product-density laws.
Borel measurability and range correctness of the finite scan proves that the finite-scan algorithm Exact Gaussian randomized range finder returns a measurable orthogonal projector onto . If and are any two orthonormal bases of that same subspace, then : for every vector , both and lie in the subspace, while their residuals lie in its orthogonal complement; uniqueness of this orthogonal decomposition makes the projections equal.
Countable Choice is the axiom used for the finite-dimensional Gaussian probability laws (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
If , the hypotheses and constants are exactly those of [F1], which proves the asserted expectation bound.
If , let be the basis returned by the measurable finite-scan algorithm in [F4]. The in the Statement and are orthonormal bases of the same sample range, so [F4] gives for every draw. The expected error is therefore the same measurable random variable as for , and [F2] supplies the required bound with the stated normalized-complex convention [F3].
The cases and exhaust the field choice; steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove the full displayed assertion.
Depends on
- Expected spectral error of the real Gaussian range finder
- Direct expected spectral bound for the normalized complex range finder
- Exact Gaussian randomized range finder
- Standard real and normalized complex Gaussian matrix laws
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Borel measurability and range correctness of the finite scan
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Halko, Martinsson, and Tropp, Theorem 10.6 and its complex-case discussion (standard reference, not scraped)
- Martinsson and Tropp, Randomized Numerical Linear Algebra: Foundations & Algorithms, Theorem 11.5 (standard reference, not scraped)