Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The causal heat kernel is the fundamental solution of the heat operator

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and let n≥1, and let Γ be the causal extension of the heat kernel. Then Γ∈Lloc1(Rn+1), and its regular distribution uΓ∈D′(Rn+1) satisfies (∂t−Δ)uΓ=δ(0,0), that is, ⟨(∂t−Δ)uΓ,φ⟩=φ(0,0)for every φ∈Cc∞(Rn+1), so the causal extension is a fundamental solution of ∂t−Δ. Moreover Γ(⋅,t)→δ0 in D′(Rn) as t↓0+, that is, ∫RnΓ(x,t)φ(x) dx→φ(0) for every φ∈Cc∞(Rn). The derivative ∂t is the distributional derivative in the last space-time coordinate.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, n≥1, a test function φ∈Cc∞(Rn+1), a real R>0 with supp⁡φ contained in the open box BR×(−R,R)⊆Rn+1, and 0<ε<R.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the hypothesis carried by the integration and embedding suppliers below (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The causal extension of the heat kernel is Γ(x,t) for t>0 and Γ(x,t)=0 for t≤0, with Γ(x,t)=(4πt)−n/2exp⁡(−∣x∣2/(4t)) positive and C∞ on Rn×(0,∞) (The heat kernel on Rn and its causal extension).

[F2]

For every t>0, ∫RnΓ(x,t) dx=1, ∂tΓ=ΔxΓ on Rn×(0,∞), and (Γ(⋅,t))t>0 is an L1 approximate identity on Rn (Normalisation, parabolic scaling, heat equation and derivative bounds for the heat kernel).

[F3]

For f∈Lloc1(Ω) the regular functional ⟨uf,φ⟩=∫Ωfφ is well-defined and depends only on the almost-everywhere class of f (Regular distribution from a locally integrable function).

[F4]

The distributional derivative is ⟨∂αu,φ⟩=(−1)∣α∣⟨u,∂αφ⟩ (Distributional derivative); thus a first time derivative contributes a sign −1 and a second spatial derivative a sign +1.

[F5]

Assuming Countable Choice, f↦uf is an injection from Lloc1(Ω) modulo almost-everywhere equality into D′(Ω), and local L1 convergence implies strong distribution convergence (Locally integrable functions embed in distributions).

[F6]

The Dirac distribution satisfies δa(φ)=φ(a) and ⟨∂αδa,φ⟩=(−1)∣α∣∂αφ(a) (Dirac delta and its derivatives).

[F7]

If F,G are continuous on [a,b] and differentiable on (a,b) with F′=f, G′=g Riemann integrable there, then ∫abFg+∫abfG=F(b)G(b)−F(a)G(a) (Integration by parts for continuous factors with Riemann-integrable extensions of their interior derivatives).

[F8]

On completed sigma-finite product measure spaces, Tonelli's theorem holds for nonnegative measurable functions and Fubini's theorem for L1 functions (Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability); under Rm+n=Rm×Rn, λm+n is that completed product measure (The Euclidean Lebesgue measure is the completion of the product of the factor Lebesgue measures).

[F9]

If (Kε) is an L1 approximate identity and f is bounded and continuous, then (f∗Kε)(x)→f(x) uniformly for x in every compact set (L1 approximate identities converge uniformly on compacta for bounded continuous functions).

[F10]

For continuous f on [a,b], differentiable on (a,b), there is c∈(a,b) with f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a) (The mean value theorem, as the case g(x)=x of Cauchy's: for f continuous on [a,b] with a<b and differentiable on (a,b) there is c∈(a,b) with f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a)).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1A1F1F2F3F5F8given

Local integrability: let K⊆Rn+1 be compact and choose R>0 with K⊆BR×[−R,R]. By Tonelli's theorem [F8] over the completed product measure, ∫K∣Γ∣≤∫0R∫RnΓ(x,t) dx dt=∫0R1 dt=R<∞ using unit mass from [F2] and Γ=0 for t≤0 from [F1]; hence Γ∈Lloc1(Rn+1) and its regular functional uΓ of [F3] is a distribution by [F5].

1.2F1F2F6F9givenalgebra

Dirac limit at time zero: fix a spatial test function ψ∈Cc∞(Rn). For every t>0, ∫RnΓ(x,t)ψ(x) dx=(ψ∗Γt)(0) because Γ is spatially even, and by [F9] applied on a compact set containing 0 and supp⁡ψ this converges to ψ(0) as t↓0+, so Γ(⋅,t)→δ0 in D′(Rn) by the definition of δ0 in [F6].

2.1step 1.1F3F4given

Pairing: fix φ with support in BR×(−R,R). The definitions of the regular functional and of the distributional derivative give ⟨(∂t−Δx)uΓ,φ⟩=−∫Rn+1Γ ∂tφ−∫Rn+1Γ Δxφ=−∫Rn+1Γ(∂tφ+Δxφ), the two integrals being absolutely convergent by step 1.1 and the compact support of φ, with the signs as in [F4].

2.2step 1.1F1F2F7F8given

Truncated integration by parts: for 0<ε<R, choose T>R with supp⁡φ⊆Rn×(−T,T). Fubini [F8] on the strip ε≤t≤T, the scalar integration by parts [F7] in the time variable at each fixed x, and [F7] twice in each spatial coordinate at each fixed t (the boundary terms vanish because φ and all its derivatives are supported in the open box BR×(−R,R)) give ∫ε∞∫RnΓ ∂tφ dx dt=−∫RnΓ(x,ε)φ(x,ε) dx−∫ε∞∫Rn∂tΓ φ dx dt and ∫ε∞∫RnΓ Δxφ dx dt=∫ε∞∫RnΔxΓ φ dx dt; adding the two identities and substituting the heat equation ∂tΓ=ΔxΓ of [F2] cancels the interior terms and yields ∫ε∞∫RnΓ(∂tφ+Δxφ) dx dt=−∫RnΓ(x,ε)φ(x,ε) dx.

3.1step 2.1step 2.2F1F2F9F10givenalgebra

Limit as ε↓0: by step 2.2 and step 2.1, ⟨(∂t−Δx)uΓ,φ⟩=lim⁡ε↓0∫RnΓ(x,ε)φ(x,ε) dx. Write the last integral as ∫RnΓ(x,ε)φ(x,0) dx+∫RnΓ(x,ε)(φ(x,ε)−φ(x,0)) dx. The first term equals (φ(⋅,0)∗Γε)(0) because Γ is even in its spatial variable, and it tends to φ(0,0) by the approximate-identity corollary [F9] applied to the bounded continuous compactly supported function x↦φ(x,0) on a compact set containing 0; the second term is bounded in modulus by sup⁡x∣φ(x,ε)−φ(x,0)∣⋅∥Γ(⋅,ε)∥1≤εsup⁡∣∂tφ∣ by the mean value theorem [F10] in the time variable and unit mass from [F2], hence tends to 0.

4.1step 1.1step 3.1step 1.2F6given∎

Step 3.1 gives ⟨(∂t−Δx)uΓ,φ⟩=φ(0,0)=⟨δ(0,0),φ⟩ for every φ∈Cc∞(Rn+1) by [F6], that is, (∂t−Δx)uΓ=δ(0,0); step 1.2 gives the weak Dirac limit at time zero; step 1.1 gives local integrability, so the causal extension is a fundamental solution of ∂t−Δx.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

68 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources