Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Integrated Legendre projection gives an explicit p-rate in H1

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let p≥1, s≥0, g∈HLs as defined in Legendre weighted spectral-Sobolev scale and projection, identified with its canonical L2(−1,1) class, and let c∈R. Define u(x)=c+∫−1xg(t) dt and Ipu=Ip(c,g) by Endpoint-preserving integrated Legendre projector. Then u and Ipu are absolutely continuous, Ipu∈Pp, and Ipu(±1)=u(±1). Moreover, ∥u−Ipu∥H1(−1,1)≤5 (1+p(p+1))−s/2∥g∥HLs, where the displayed H1 error norm is (∥u−Ipu∥L22+∥g−Πp−1g∥L22)1/2. This coefficient-scale assertion does not identify HLs with an ordinary derivative-based Sobolev norm.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, p≥1, s≥0, g∈HLs, and c∈R.

[F1]

Endpoint-preserving integrated Legendre projector: Ip(c,g)=c+∫−1xΠp−1g is the degree-p endpoint-anchored operator, with Πp−1 the finite Legendre projection.

[F2]

Legendre polynomials have explicit norms and weighted derivative orthogonality: ∫−11PnPm=2δnm/(2n+1) and P0=1.

[F3]

Legendre weighted spectral-Sobolev scale and projection: HLs is a coefficient completion with weights (1+n(n+1))s2/(2n+1), so truncation is the finite projection from [F1] and its coefficient norm dominates the s=0 coefficient norm.

[F4]

Legendre weighted projection has its spectral-Sobolev rate: ∥g−ΠNg∥LL2≤(1+(N+1)(N+2))−s/2∥g∥HLs.

[F5]

The indefinite integral of an L1 function is absolutely continuous: the primitive of an L1 function is absolutely continuous.

[F6]

The indefinite integral of an L1 function is differentiable almost everywhere: under Countable Choice, the derivative of the primitive of an L1 function equals its integrand almost everywhere.

[F8]

Polynomials are uniformly dense in C([a,b],R) for every closed interval: polynomials are uniformly dense in C([−1,1]).

[F9]

Smooth compactly supported functions of an open set are dense in L2: Cc∞((−1,1)) is dense in L2(−1,1).

[F10]

Riesz-Fischer completeness of Lp for 1≤p≤∞: under Countable Choice, L2(−1,1) is complete.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F5F7F8F9F10givenalgebra

By [F2], finite Legendre sums span all polynomials. The density facts [F8] and [F9] imply that polynomials are dense in L2(−1,1): first approximate an L2 class by a compactly supported smooth function, then approximate that function uniformly on [−1,1] by a polynomial. The coefficient norm at s=0 is the ordinary L2 norm on finite Legendre sums by [F2]–[F3], and [F10] makes L2(−1,1) complete. Hence the identity on finite sums extends to an isometry from HL0 onto L2(−1,1). Since each spectral weight for s≥0 is at least its s=0 weight, [F3] gives a continuous embedding HLs→HL0. Thus g has the canonical L2 class in the Statement, and Cauchy–Schwarz [F7] on the interval of length two gives g∈L1. Then [F5] makes u absolutely continuous. The definition [F1] makes Ipu the integral of a polynomial of degree at most p−1, hence a degree-at-most-p polynomial. By the finite projection formula in [F1] and Legendre orthogonality [F2], g−Πp−1g is orthogonal to constants, so ∫Πp−1g=∫g and the endpoint values agree. The primitive defining Ipu is absolutely continuous by [F5].

2.1F1F3F4F6F7step 1.1algebra∎

Apply [F6] to the two primitives in step 1.1; their a.e. derivatives are g and Πp−1g, so e=u−Ipu has derivative e′=g−Πp−1g. By [F3] the finite projection is the truncation in [F1]; the tail estimate [F4] with N=p−1 gives ∥e′∥L2≤(1+p(p+1))−s/2∥g∥HLs. Since e(−1)=0, e(x)=∫−1xe′(t) dt; Cauchy–Schwarz [F7] and integration over an interval of length two give ∥e∥L2≤2∥e′∥L2. Therefore ∥e∥H12=∥e∥L22+∥e′∥L22≤5∥e′∥L22, proving the estimate.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

72 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources