How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Indecomposable projective functors are indexed by the Weyl group
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. In a regular integral block with dominant representative :
- Projective functors form a Krull-Schmidt category.
- Their indecomposables are indexed by , with characterized by . For a reduced word , the functor is a multiplicity-one summand of , and every other indecomposable summand has a label . In particular every indecomposable projective functor is generated as a summand by wall crossings.
- Two projective functors are naturally equivalent exactly when their induced operators on the Grothendieck group agree.
The characterization concerns evaluation on the dominant projective Verma; no faithfulness of that evaluation on all natural maps of arbitrary endofunctors is asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The regular integral block with dominant representative , its projective functors, and the wall-crossing functors .
Duflo–Joseph identifies the finite adjoint part of with , and the harmonic isotypic modules of surject onto those of (Duflo–Joseph g-finite endomorphisms of every Verma module, Adjoint isotypic modules have the zero-weight rank). Tensor-Hom adjunction expresses a -map as a -map , so these suppliers lift its matrix coefficients to .
Every standard embeds in the dominant standard (Dominant integral dot translates embed canonically in the Verma module, BGG reciprocity).
Every indecomposable projective of the block is a summand of a word of wall crossings applied to , the top summand occurring once and all other summands having labels (Wall-crossing compositions produce the projective with the top standard label, The wall-crossing functor and its unit and counit).
The class map is an isomorphism and the BGG matrix is unitriangular for the Bruhat order, so a projective is determined up to isomorphism by its class (The wall-crossing action on the Grothendieck group is multiplication by 1+s, BGG reciprocity, The Grothendieck group and character of O).
Proof
Let be the class of projective functors and evaluate a natural transformation at . For ambient tensor functors, lift the finite equivariant coefficient map in [F1] to . Its tensor coefficients act on every module by the same formula, yielding a natural -map. For projected functors, extend a map between projected evaluations by inclusion and projection to the ambient tensors, lift it there, then project on the output and include on the input. The same inclusion/retraction procedure handles functor summands. Thus evaluation is surjective on Hom spaces.
The evaluation kernel is nilpotent. If vanishes on , then by exactness and naturality it vanishes on every standard, since each standard embeds in by [F2] and exactness preserves the embedding; on a fixed projective generator with a finite Verma flag of length , vanishing on the standard factors strictly lowers the flag, so a composition of such maps is zero. Hence is a nilpotent ideal on every finite additive functor sum.
Idempotents lift across a nilpotent ideal (if lies in a nilpotent ideal, replace by ; its idempotent error lies in the square of the previous error ideal, so finitely many repetitions give an idempotent) and an element nilpotent is invertible by a finite geometric series; hence decompositions and isomorphism classes of projective functors coincide with those of their evaluations at , and the endomorphism algebra of an indecomposable is local exactly when its evaluation is. Hom spaces are finite-dimensional for a separate reason: a natural transformation between right-exact functors is determined by its value on a finite projective generator , since every object has a finite presentation by sums of . Its component is a member of the finite-dimensional space (maps are determined by images of finitely many weight-homogeneous generators into finite-dimensional weight spaces). Thus the functor category has finite-dimensional endomorphism algebras and split idempotents. Nilpotent-kernel lifting matches its indecomposable decompositions to those of the evaluations, proving Krull–Schmidt.
By [F3] the wall word evaluated at has the decompositions ; by step 3.1 this decomposition lifts uniquely to a decomposition of the functor, producing with and with all other summands labelled ; conversely every indecomposable projective functor is a summand of such a word, so the labels exhaust the indecomposables. This proves (1) and (2).
If two projective functors have the same class operator on , then their evaluations at are projectives with the same class; by the unitriangular BGG matrix [F4] their indecomposable decompositions agree, so the evaluations are isomorphic, and by step 3.1 the functors are naturally equivalent; the converse is formal. This proves (3).
Depends on
- Projective functors on a regular integral block
- Wall-crossing compositions produce the projective with the top standard label
- The wall-crossing action on the Grothendieck group is multiplication by 1+s
- Finite-dimensional tensoring reaches every simple of a linkage class
- Category O has enough projectives
- Projective covers in O are indecomposable and unique
- The Axiom of Choice
- Adjoint isotypic modules have the zero-weight rank
- Duflo–Joseph g-finite endomorphisms of every Verma module
- Wedderburn–Artin theorem for semisimple rings
- The coinvariant algebra is a complete intersection with one-dimensional socle
- The wall-crossing functor and its unit and counit
- Dominant integral dot translates embed canonically in the Verma module
- BGG reciprocity
- The Grothendieck group and character of O
Used by
- Wall-crossing functors do not commute Counterexample
- Indecomposable projectives correspond to indecomposable Soergel modules Theorem
- Soergel's Struktursatz: the functor V is fully faithful on projectives Theorem
Cited to discharge well-definedness by The wall-crossing functor and its unit and counit.
Dependency tree · two levels
106 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. N. Bernstein, S. I. Gelfand, Tensor products of finite and infinite dimensional representations of semisimple Lie algebras, Compositio Math. 41 (1980) 245-285 (Numdam full text) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Arthur Garnier, The classical theory of Soergel bimodules and the link with Lusztig's conjecture, Oberwolfach Arbeitsgemeinschaft note (2022) (standard reference, not scraped)