Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Reduced Khovanov cohomology detects the unknot

Statement

Assume full AC. Let K⊂S3 be a smooth knot. The total normalized integral reduced Khovanov cohomology is isomorphic to Z concentrated in bidegree (0,0) if and only if K is the unknot.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC, a smooth knot K⊂S3, and the normalized reduced integral Khovanov cohomology of K.

[F1]

The fixed reflection satisfies K‾‾=K and carries the standard unknot to itself (Mirror of a classical knot, Definition).

[F2]

For the crossingless based unknot diagram, the reduced quotient removes the based-circle X label and places the surviving 1 generator in bidegree (0,0) (Reduced Khovanov cohomology of a knot, Definition).

[A1]

For every knot J, there is a finite spectral sequence from Kh~(J‾;Z) to I♮(J;Z) (Reduced Khovanov cohomology feeds the singular instanton spectral sequence, Statement). The integral resolution/cube construction is the retained original-facing completed supplier; it does not include the KHI rank implication.

[A2]

For every knot J, I♮(J;Q)≅KHI(J;Q) and dim⁡QKHI(J;Q)≥1, with equality exactly for the unknot (Sutured instanton knot homology detects the unknot, Statement). The supplier now records the needed ordinary surface, closure/excision and genus/nonvanishing results as explicitly published external inputs under the run-specific permission, retaining its local singular and unknot calculations. This does not pretend that the analytic complex or integral cube alone proves rank detection.

[A3]

The reduced groups are independent of the based diagram and basepoint under ACω (Reduced Khovanov cohomology is invariant under based moves and basepoint transport, Statement). This is consumed at its declared mathematical interface; workflow readiness or historical owner hashes are not mathematical premises of this proof.

Proof

1.1A1F1A3givenconstruct

Suppose Kh~(K;Z)≅Z as a total graded group. Set J=K‾. By [F1], J‾=K. The E2 group in [A1] for J is therefore Z, so its rationalization has dimension one.

2.1A1step 1.1algebra

Put S=Z∖{0}. Localization S−1(−)=(−)⊗ZQ preserves exact sequences: if f:A→B is injective and f(a)/s=0, some t∈S has f(ta)=0, hence ta=0 and a/s=0; if g:B→C follows f and g(b)/s=0, choose t∈S with tb∈ker⁡g=im⁡f, say f(a)=tb, so b/s=f(a)/(ts); if g is surjective, each c/s is the image of a lift divided by s. Thus localization commutes with kernels, images, and homology.

3.1A1step 2.1algebra

The spectral sequence in [A1] is obtained by taking successive homology pages of a finite filtered complex. Exact localization therefore identifies its rationalized pages with the pages of the rationalized filtered complex, and identifies the localized abutment with I♮(K‾;Q). The E2 page has rational dimension one by step 1.1.

4.1A1step 3.1algebra

On each finite-dimensional rational page, the next page is homology. For any differential d on a finite-dimensional vector space V, rank-nullity gives dim⁡H(V,d)=dim⁡V−2dim⁡im⁡d≤dim⁡V. Iterating this inequality over the finite spectral sequence bounds the total dimension of E∞ by its one-dimensional E2 page; since the finite abutment filtration has associated graded E∞, its total dimension equals dim⁡QI♮(K‾;Q)≤1.

5.1A2F1step 4.1algebra

By [A2], this target has dimension at least one, so it has dimension one. The rank-detection clause of [A2] implies that K‾ is the unknot; applying the same reflection gives that K is the unknot.

6.1F2givenalgebra∎

Conversely, for the crossingless one-circle unknot diagram the reduced complex has the single generator from [F2] and no differential. Its total cohomology is therefore Z in bidegree (0,0). This proves the converse and hence the stated equivalence.

Proof status

The rank argument is complete relative to the explicitly labelled supplier interfaces [A1]–[A3]. The accepted integral resolution construction supplies [A1]; its proof is reused without rereading or revalidating it. The rank detector [A2] now supplies its precise published ordinary-surface, closure/excision and genus/nonvanishing inputs under the expanded run-specific permission; this is a source-qualified use, not a claim of local reconstruction of those inputs. With [A1]–[A3], the finite localization/rank argument proves the unchanged Statement. It uses no distinguished instanton vector and gives no workflow-readiness conclusion.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources