Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

L1 stability and the smooth-data error bound

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let 0<α<1, λ≥0, T>0, and h=T/N for an integer N≥1, with uniform grid tn=nh. Let u∈C2([0,T]) and set U0=u(0). For 1≤n≤N, define the exact nodal forcing by its pointwise Caputo integral representative, Fn:=1Γ(1−α)∫0tn(tn−s)−αu′(s) ds+λu(tn)(1≤n≤N). The integral is finite by the kernel-power bound and boundedness of u′. We use it as the pointwise representative of DCαu for this smooth datum. Let Un be the uniform-grid L1 solution from Uniform-grid and graded-grid L1 discretization using those forcing values. The proof verifies absolute continuity of u, so its Caputo derivative is defined. Put Cα:=1Γ(1−α)(11−α+1+α2). Then max⁡0≤n≤N∣Un−u(tn)∣≤CαTαΓ(1+α)∥u′′∥∞h2−α. The estimate is only asserted under the displayed C2 hypothesis; its constant is not claimed uniform as α↑1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, 0<α<1, λ≥0, T>0, h=T/N, the uniform grid tn=nh, and u∈C2([0,T]).

[A1]

Countable Choice: every sequence of nonempty sets admits a choice function (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)); it is used only in [F10].

[F1]

Uniform-grid and graded-grid L1 discretization: the discrete derivative is the integral of the piecewise-constant secant slope against (tn−s)−α/Γ(1−α) on each grid interval, and the algorithm's returned sequence satisfies its discrete equation by Positive L1 weights, discrete comparison, and residual stability.

[F2]

Positive L1 weights, discrete comparison, and residual stability: if δTαen+λen=rn, e0=0, and max⁡n∣rn∣≤R, then max⁡n∣en∣≤TαR/Γ(1+α).

[F3]

Fractional integral and Caputo derivative: DCαu(t)=Γ(1−α)−1∫0t(t−s)−αu′(s) ds.

[F4]

Higher derivatives and the classes Ck and C∞: C2([0,T]) makes u′ and u′′ continuous, with one-sided endpoint derivatives.

[F5]

Heine-Borel by bisection: every closed bounded interval [a,b] is compact, Open cover, subcover, compact metric space, and compact subset of a metric space, and A continuous real function on a compact subset of R is bounded: continuous real functions on [0,T] are bounded; in particular M1:=∥u′∥∞ and M2:=∥u′′∥∞ are finite.

[F6]

Absolute continuity on a compact interval: absolute continuity means that summed endpoint increments over any finite disjoint interval family are small whenever the total interval length is small.

[F7]
[F8]

A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion: a continuous function on a compact interval is Riemann integrable.

[F10]

A bounded Riemann integrable function on a closed bounded interval is Lebesgue measurable and has the same integral: under [A1], a bounded Riemann-integrable function has the same Riemann and Lebesgue integrals.

[F11]

The real Gamma functional equation Γ(s+1)=sΓ(s): Γ(2−α)=(1−α)Γ(1−α).

[F12]
[F13]

Integral of the fractional power kernel: ∫0hr−αdr=h1−α/(1−α).

Proof

1.1givenF5F6F7construct

Set M1=∥u′∥∞<∞ by [F5]. For every interval [a,b]⊆[0,T], [F7] gives ∣u(b)−u(a)∣≤M1(b−a). Thus for any finite disjoint interval family, the sum of endpoint increments is at most M1 times the total interval length. Given ε>0, choose δ=ε/(M1+1); [F6] then shows u is absolutely continuous.

2.1givenA1F4F5F7F8F9F10step 1.1

Put M2=∥u′′∥∞. On each grid interval [tk−1,tk], let mk=(u(tk)−u(tk−1))/h and ek(s)=mk−u′(s). The continuous function u′ is Riemann integrable by [F8]; [F9] and [F10] give hmk=∫tk−1tku′(s) ds for the Lebesgue integral, so ∫tk−1tkek(s) ds=0. By [F7] applied to u′, for any r,s in this interval, ∣u′(r)−u′(s)∣≤M2∣r−s∣≤M2h. Averaging in r gives ∣ek(s)∣≤M2h.

3.1givenF1F3F11F13step 2.1construct

The formula [F1] and the Caputo definition [F3] now give, with dn:=Γ(1−α)−1∫0tn(tn−s)−αu′(s) ds and τn:=δhαu(tn)−dn, τn=1Γ(1−α)∑k=1n∫tk−1tkek(s)(tn−s)−α ds.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1F5F11F12F13algebra

On the last interval, [F13] and [F11] bound the absolute contribution to τn by M2hΓ(1−α)∫0hr−α dr=M2h2−αΓ(2−α). For k<n, subtract the kernel value at the interval midpoint, using ∫ek=0 from step 2.1. The derivative of the kernel has magnitude at most α((n−k)h)−α−1 on that interval, so its variation from the midpoint is at most αh((n−k)h)−α−1/2. Thus the kth earlier contribution is at most αM22Γ(1−α)h2−α(n−k)−1−α. Since x−1−α is decreasing, each term with j≥2 is at most ∫j−1jx−1−αdx; hence ∑j=1n−1j−1−α≤1+∫1∞x−1−αdx=1+1/α. Summing and using [F11] yields ∣τn∣≤CαM2h2−α for every n.

4.2givenF1step 3.1algebra

Set En=Un−u(tn). By the definition of Fn, subtracting its exact nodal identity from the uniform-grid recurrence gives δhαEn+λEn=−τn, with E0=0.

5.1step 4.1step 4.2F2∎

Apply [F2] with R=CαM2h2−α from step 4.1. This gives the claimed maximum error bound.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

91 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources