Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The normalized matrix coefficients form an orthonormal basis of L2(K)

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let K be a compact Hausdorff group with normalized Haar probability μ and let B=(uijπ) be the normalized irreducible matrix coefficient family (The normalized irreducible matrix coefficient family). Then B is an orthonormal family in L2(K,μ;C) and its closed linear span is all of L2(K); equivalently, B is an orthonormal basis (Hilbert basis) of L2(K), and ∑π,i,j∣⟨f,uijπ⟩∣2=∥f∥22 for every f∈L2(K).

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The normalized family is uijπ(k)=dπ⟨π(k)eiπ,ejπ⟩, with one representative and one orthonormal basis fixed in each class π∈K^, and dπ≥1 is the dimension of the class. (The normalized irreducible matrix coefficient family)

[F2]

Schur orthogonality in the convention ⟨π(k)v,w⟩: for inequivalent irreducible classes the L2 inner product of any two matrix coefficients is 0, and for a single class π one has ∫K⟨π(k)v,w⟩⟨π(k)v′,w′⟩‾ dμ(k)=dπ−1⟨v,v′⟩⟨w,w′⟩‾. (Schur orthogonality for general compact groups)

[F3]

Every finite-dimensional continuous complex representation of K is a direct sum of finitely many irreducible subrepresentations, and every closed invariant subspace of a unitary representation has a closed invariant orthogonal complement, so the decomposition may be taken orthogonal. (Complete reducibility of finite-dimensional compact-group representations, Invariant orthogonal complements in unitary representations)

[F4]

Coefficients split over orthogonal direct sums: for a finite orthogonal direct sum of subrepresentations, cv,wπ=∑mcvm,wmπm. (Direct sums and tensor products of finite-dimensional unitary representations)

[F5]

R(K) is the span of the matrix coefficients of all finite-dimensional continuous unitary representations of K, and it is uniformly dense in C(K,C). (Representative functions on a compact group, Uniform density of representative functions (topological Peter-Weyl theorem))

[F6]

L2(K,μ;C) is complete and C(K,C) is dense in it. (Completeness of the complex Haar L1 and L2 spaces and density of Cc, Hilbert space)

[F7]

For an orthonormal family in a Hilbert space, completeness (closed linear span equal to the whole space) is equivalent to the Parseval identity ∑i∣⟨x,ei⟩∣2=∥x∥2 for every x, and a complete orthonormal family is by definition a Hilbert basis. (Parseval equivalences for an orthonormal family, Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases)

[F8]

Under AC every bounded self-intertwiner of a complex irreducible unitary representation is scalar. (Schur lemma for complex unitary representations)

[F9]

Finite-dimensional continuous unitary matrix coefficients separate the points of a compact Hausdorff group. (Matrix coefficients of finite-dimensional representations separate points of a compact group)

Proof

Given: AC, a compact Hausdorff group K with normalized Haar probability μ, and the normalized family B=(uijπ) indexed by {(π,i,j):π∈K^, 1≤i,j≤dπ}.

1.1F1F2

For classes π,σ and indices, [F1] and [F2] give ∫Kuijπuklσ‾ dμ=dπdσ∫K⟨π(k)eiπ,ejπ⟩⟨σ(k)ekσ,elσ⟩‾ dμ(k), which is 0 when π≠σ (the classes are inequivalent) and equals dπ2⋅dπ−1⟨eiπ,ekπ⟩⟨ejπ,elπ⟩‾=δikδjl when π=σ, by orthonormality of the fixed bases; hence B is an orthonormal family in L2(K).

1.2F1F3F4F5F6

Let f=cv,wσ be a coefficient of a finite-dimensional continuous unitary representation on V. By [F3] take an orthogonal decomposition V=⨁m=1rVm into irreducible subrepresentations σm, with classes πm∈K^. Choose unitary intertwiners Tm:Hπm→Vm and write v=∑mvm, w=∑mwm, am=Tm−1vm, bm=Tm−1wm. Unitarity and intertwining give ⟨σm(k)vm,wm⟩=⟨πm(k)am,bm⟩. Expanding am,bm in the fixed basis of Hπm and using [F4] gives f(k)=∑m,i,j⟨am,eiπm⟩⟨bm,ejπm⟩‾ uijπm(k)/dπm. Hence R(K)⊆span⁡B. Since μ(K)=1, uniform approximation implies L2 approximation. The uniform density of R(K) in C(K) and the L2 density of C(K) [F5,F6] therefore show that the closed span of B is L2(K).

2.1F7step 1.2

By the Parseval equivalences [F7] applied to the orthonormal family B, completeness is equivalent to the identity ∑π,i,j∣⟨f,uijπ⟩∣2=∥f∥22 for every f∈L2(K) and to B being a Hilbert basis of L2(K); step 1.2 supplies completeness, so both conclusions hold. The Axiom of Choice is inherited through the fixed representatives and bases and the cited suppliers; this proof adds no further choice.

3.1F1F3F4F5F8F9step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1∎

If K is abelian, every irreducible π is one dimensional: for each g, π(g) commutes with every π(h) and is a bounded self-intertwiner, hence scalar by [F8]. Every line would therefore be invariant, so irreducibility forces dimension one. The scalar χπ(g) is a continuous unit-circle-valued homomorphism. Conversely each such character is an irreducible one-dimensional unitary representation, and two of these representations are equivalent exactly when their characters agree. By [F1] its sole normalized matrix coefficient is χπ. Finite complete reducibility and coefficient splitting [F3,F4] therefore identify R(K) with the finite linear span of characters. This span is uniformly dense in C(K) by [F5]. The characters separate points: if all had equal values at two points, every finite linear combination, and hence every finite-dimensional matrix coefficient, would also have equal values there, contradicting [F9]. Finally steps 1.1–2.1 identify the character family as an orthonormal Hilbert basis of L2(K), with Parseval. These are the three compact-abelian Fourier conclusions, derived without general LCA separation or biduality.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

106 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources