How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The normalized matrix coefficients form an orthonormal basis of L2(K)
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a compact Hausdorff group with normalized Haar probability and let be the normalized irreducible matrix coefficient family (The normalized irreducible matrix coefficient family). Then is an orthonormal family in and its closed linear span is all of ; equivalently, is an orthonormal basis (Hilbert basis) of , and for every .
Facts & Assumptions
The normalized family is , with one representative and one orthonormal basis fixed in each class , and is the dimension of the class. (The normalized irreducible matrix coefficient family)
Schur orthogonality in the convention : for inequivalent irreducible classes the inner product of any two matrix coefficients is , and for a single class one has . (Schur orthogonality for general compact groups)
Every finite-dimensional continuous complex representation of is a direct sum of finitely many irreducible subrepresentations, and every closed invariant subspace of a unitary representation has a closed invariant orthogonal complement, so the decomposition may be taken orthogonal. (Complete reducibility of finite-dimensional compact-group representations, Invariant orthogonal complements in unitary representations)
Coefficients split over orthogonal direct sums: for a finite orthogonal direct sum of subrepresentations, . (Direct sums and tensor products of finite-dimensional unitary representations)
is the span of the matrix coefficients of all finite-dimensional continuous unitary representations of , and it is uniformly dense in . (Representative functions on a compact group, Uniform density of representative functions (topological Peter-Weyl theorem))
is complete and is dense in it. (Completeness of the complex Haar L1 and L2 spaces and density of Cc, Hilbert space)
For an orthonormal family in a Hilbert space, completeness (closed linear span equal to the whole space) is equivalent to the Parseval identity for every , and a complete orthonormal family is by definition a Hilbert basis. (Parseval equivalences for an orthonormal family, Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases)
Under AC every bounded self-intertwiner of a complex irreducible unitary representation is scalar. (Schur lemma for complex unitary representations)
Finite-dimensional continuous unitary matrix coefficients separate the points of a compact Hausdorff group. (Matrix coefficients of finite-dimensional representations separate points of a compact group)
Proof
Given: AC, a compact Hausdorff group with normalized Haar probability , and the normalized family indexed by .
For classes and indices, [F1] and [F2] give , which is when (the classes are inequivalent) and equals when , by orthonormality of the fixed bases; hence is an orthonormal family in .
Let be a coefficient of a finite-dimensional continuous unitary representation on . By [F3] take an orthogonal decomposition into irreducible subrepresentations , with classes . Choose unitary intertwiners and write , , , . Unitarity and intertwining give . Expanding in the fixed basis of and using [F4] gives . Hence . Since , uniform approximation implies approximation. The uniform density of in and the density of [F5,F6] therefore show that the closed span of is .
By the Parseval equivalences [F7] applied to the orthonormal family , completeness is equivalent to the identity for every and to being a Hilbert basis of ; step 1.2 supplies completeness, so both conclusions hold. The Axiom of Choice is inherited through the fixed representatives and bases and the cited suppliers; this proof adds no further choice.
If is abelian, every irreducible is one dimensional: for each , commutes with every and is a bounded self-intertwiner, hence scalar by [F8]. Every line would therefore be invariant, so irreducibility forces dimension one. The scalar is a continuous unit-circle-valued homomorphism. Conversely each such character is an irreducible one-dimensional unitary representation, and two of these representations are equivalent exactly when their characters agree. By [F1] its sole normalized matrix coefficient is . Finite complete reducibility and coefficient splitting [F3,F4] therefore identify with the finite linear span of characters. This span is uniformly dense in by [F5]. The characters separate points: if all had equal values at two points, every finite linear combination, and hence every finite-dimensional matrix coefficient, would also have equal values there, contradicting [F9]. Finally steps 1.1–2.1 identify the character family as an orthonormal Hilbert basis of , with Parseval. These are the three compact-abelian Fourier conclusions, derived without general LCA separation or biduality.
Depends on
- Schur lemma for complex unitary representations
- Matrix coefficients of finite-dimensional representations separate points of a compact group
- Uniform density of representative functions (topological Peter-Weyl theorem)
- The normalized irreducible matrix coefficient family
- Schur orthogonality for general compact groups
- Complete reducibility of finite-dimensional compact-group representations
- Completeness of the complex Haar L1 and L2 spaces and density of Cc
- Parseval equivalences for an orthonormal family
- The Bessel inequality for an arbitrary orthonormal family
- Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases
- Hilbert space
- The Axiom of Choice
- Invariant orthogonal complements in unitary representations
- Representative functions on a compact group
- Direct sums and tensor products of finite-dimensional unitary representations
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
106 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Emmanuel Kowalski, An Introduction to the Representation Theory of Groups (author-hosted draft, 338 pp.) (standard reference, not scraped)
- David A. Vogan, Review of Harmonic Analysis on Compact Groups (MIT lecture notes, 12 pp.) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Constantin Teleman, Representation Theory (Berkeley lecture notes, 60 pp.) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Terence Tao, 254A Notes 3 (author-hosted lecture notes, 2011) (standard reference, not scraped)