Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pending
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Reverse-time SDE for an unbounded-start Markov diffusion

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Work on a complete filtered probability space (Ω,F,(Ft)0≤t≤T,P) with the usual conditions. Let W be an adapted standard d-dimensional Brownian motion such that Wt−Ws is independent of Fs and has law Nd(0,(t−s)Id) for 0≤s<t≤T. Let X0 be a finite F0-measurable vector independent of the future Brownian increments. Let X be an adapted continuous nonexplosive Markov diffusion on [0,T] in Rd, where nonexplosive means its paths remain in Rd throughout the interval and Markov means conditional future laws given the past filtration depend only on the current state. Assume ∫0T∣bs(Xs)∣ds<∞ and ∫0T∥σs(Xs)∥F2ds<∞ almost surely. It satisfies dXt=bt(Xt)dt+σt(Xt)dWt, where W is standard d-dimensional Brownian motion and σt(x) is square and invertible with sup⁡t,x∥σt(x)−1∥<∞. Put at(x)=σt(x)σt(x)T. A transition density means P(Xt∈dy∣Xs=x)=q(s,x;t,y)dy. Assume pt is the marginal density of Xt for every t∈[0,T], meaning P(Xt∈A)=∫Apt(x)dx for every Borel set A. Assume pt and q(s,x;t,y) are positive probability densities, with pt having one continuous time derivative and two continuous state derivatives, and satisfying pt(y)=∫ps(x)q(s,x;t,y)dx,q(s,x;t,y)=∫q(s,x;r,z)q(r,z;t,y)dz(s<r<t). For Ltϕ=bt⋅∇ϕ+12at:D2ϕ, define its formal adjoint by Lt∗r=−∂i(bt,ir)+12∂i∂j(at,ijr) and assume ∂tpt=Lt∗pt and ∂tq(s,x;t,y)=Lt∗,yq(s,x;t,y) classically. Assume that for every compactly supported smooth test function the transition integrals and their time derivatives are absolutely integrable, differentiation under those integrals is valid, and integration by parts in space has no boundary term. For each initial law, assume the reverse martingale problem for the operator defined by the Bayes-density expression below has a unique nonexplosive continuous solution in law; here this means existence and uniqueness in law of a continuous process for which each compact-test compensated process is a local martingale.

For 0≤u<v≤T define Ku,v(y,dx)=pT−v(x)q(T−v,x;T−u,y)pT−u(y) dx, and let Yu=XT−u with reversed filtration Gu=σ(Yr:0≤r≤u). Then these are the transition kernels of Y, and for 0≤u<T its generator on ϕ∈Cc∞(Rd) is L~uϕ=pT−u−1{LT−u∗(pT−uϕ)−ϕLT−u∗pT−u}. Consequently Y solves the reverse SDE dYu=[−bT−u(Yu)+(∇ ⁣⋅aT−u)(Yu)+aT−u(Yu)∇log⁡pT−u(Yu)]du+σT−u(Yu)dBu, where (∇ ⁣⋅a)i=∑j∂jaij and B is a standard d-dimensional Brownian motion in the reversed filtration. This theorem starts from the assumed positive density regime; it does not infer densities from strong SDE well-posedness.

Statement references

Song et al., Sections 3.2 and Appendix A.3: downstream application of the state-dependent reverse-drift formula, citing Anderson; it is not used as the proof of the general Bayes-kernel theorem.

Tang and Zhao, Section 2, Theorem 2.1, equation (2.3), PDF pp. 4–5: gives the formula and a heuristic derivation; it does not prove the density or martingale-problem hypotheses.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Markov diffusion, densities, regularity, integrability, ellipticity, and reverse martingale-problem hypotheses in the Statement.

[A1]

AC is required by the vector Lévy characterization and the local continuous-martingale calculus used below. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

Bayes' formula gives the displayed reverse kernels; the forward marginal and Chapman–Kolmogorov identities make them probability kernels satisfying reverse Chapman–Kolmogorov. Bayes-reversed transition kernels for a diffusion

[F2]

If an auxiliary reverse Itô solution has spacetime absolutely continuous stopped occupation measures and initial density pT, the classical forward density equations identify its law and kernels with the actual reversed process. The proof uses positive mixtures of q/p, conservation, time averaging, and a fixed-endpoint L1 limit. Forward density duality identifies an auxiliary reverse process

[F3]

For symmetric a, the formal adjoint product rule is p−1{Lt∗(pϕ)−ϕLt∗p}=(−bi+p−1∂j(paij))∂iϕ+12aij∂ijϕ. Thus the first-order coefficient is −b+∇ ⁣⋅a+a∇log⁡p. Reversed kernels, generator, and martingale problem

[F4]

For a continuous semimartingale Y=M+A with local-martingale part M and continuous finite-variation part A, the localized product formula identifies the covariation from the coordinate-product martingale tests. A continuous finite-variation local martingale is constant. Bounded stopping preserves the martingale identities used in the compact-test localization. Quadratic variation of a continuous local martingale

[F5]

For a predictable invertible matrix process σ with bounded inverse and finite pathwise squared energy, bracket ∫σσTdt yields a Brownian inverse-diffusion integral and the recovery identity M=∫σ dB, without continuity of σ. Brownian reconstruction with a predictable elliptic coefficient

[F6]

The predictable sigma-algebra contains deterministic Borel time functions and adapted left-step processes; limits and Borel compositions of predictable maps are predictable. Progressively measurable and predictable processes

[F7]

A continuous Brownian Itô process with uniformly positive bracket density has spacetime absolutely continuous occupation measure after stopping to make expected drift variation and bracket trace finite; no bounded initial value or squared-drift condition is required. Stopped occupation absolute continuity for uniformly elliptic Ito processes

Proof

Given: all hypotheses and notation in the Statement; AC as required by [A1].

1.1F1

For u<v, the joint density of (XT−v,XT−u) is pT−v(x)q(T−v,x;T−u,y). Dividing by the strictly positive later marginal pT−u(y) gives the conditional law of XT−v given XT−u=y, exactly Ku,v(y,dx). Its normalization and reverse Chapman–Kolmogorov identity follow from [F1], so Y is Markov with those transitions.

2.1F2F4F5F6F7step 1.1

Choose an auxiliary nonexplosive continuous solution Z of the assumed reverse martingale problem, with initial density pT. First work in the usual augmentation and normalize continuous paths on its initial-measurable null exceptional set. The stopped event-test argument in [F5] preserves the given continuous local martingales in this augmentation. Compact coordinate cutoffs give Z=Z0+∫b~ du+N locally in state, with N a continuous local martingale. Coordinate-product cutoffs and [F4] identify [N]u=∫0uaT−v(Zv)dv: subtract the two product compensators and use that a continuous finite-variation local martingale is constant. The compact-test integrals make the local drift and trace integrals finite; nonexplosion and continuity exhaust the finite interval, without a bound on Z0. Left-step approximations as in [F6] give a predictable version of σT−u(Zu), and [F5] constructs the auxiliary Brownian Itô representation with the same drift and bracket. If C=sup⁡∥σ−1∥, then a≥C−2I. Stop when ∣Z∣ or the accumulated drift-plus-trace energy reaches n; the stops exhaust T and the expected stopped variation and trace are finite. Thus [F7] supplies their occupation absolute continuity. Apply [F2], using only the original classical forward equations for q,p and the actual forward path continuity: it identifies the continuous path law, all marginals and Bayes kernels of Z with those of Y. For the SDE conclusion, only this path-law identification is used from [F2]; the compact-test identities for Y are transferred on the usual augmented canonical filtration below.

3.1F3step 2.1

Expanding the adjoint by [F3] yields diffusion coefficient aT−u and drift b~u=−bT−u+pT−u−1∇ ⁣⋅(pT−uaT−u)=−bT−u+∇ ⁣⋅aT−u+aT−u∇log⁡pT−u.

3.2F4step 2.1

Carry the continuous path law of Y to the canonical space C([0,T],Rd) and use its usual augmented coordinate filtration. The law identification in [F2] transfers the compact-test stopped event identities there, where paths are everywhere continuous; normalize the continuous compensated processes before using [F4]. Pulling these versions back to the usual augmentation of the given reversed filtration preserves the identities. All stopping in this step is in that augmentation. Fix R and stop when ∣Y∣ first reaches R. Compactly supported cutoffs equal to xi and xixj on the ball of radius R turn the compact-test martingale identities into coordinate and coordinate-product identities. Subtracting the finite-variation drift in each coordinate identity gives continuous local martingales Mi. The product formula in [F4] shows that YiYj−Yi(0)Yj(0)−∫0⋅(b~iYj+b~jYi)dr−[Mi,Mj] is a local martingale. The coordinate-product test shows that the same expression with ∫0⋅aij(T−r,Yr)dr in place of [Mi,Mj] is a local martingale. Their difference is a continuous finite-variation local martingale, hence constant by [F4]; it starts at zero. Thus [Mi,Mj]u=∫0uaij(T−r,Yr)dr. Letting R↑∞ is valid because the assumed solution is nonexplosive.

4.1F5F6A1step 3.2∎

To handle the Borel coefficients allowed by the SDE data, choose the predictable representative Y^ obtained as follows: take left-step approximations with coefficients YkT/2n, set their time-zero value to Y0, and take their pointwise limit where finite and 0 otherwise. These maps are predictable by [F6] and agree with Y at every time on its common continuity event. The pair (r,Y^r) is predictable, so the joint Borel coefficient gives a predictable matrix Σr=σT−r(Y^r); inversion is Borel on invertible matrices, and ∥Σr−1∥ is uniformly bounded. Step 3.2 gives ∫0T∥Σr∥F2dr=tr⁡[M]T<∞ almost surely, as well as [M]u=∫0uΣrΣrTdr. Apply [F5] first in the augmented filtration to construct B=∫Σ−1dM and prove M=∫Σ dB. To recover an original-adapted Brownian version, use the original predictable sigma-algebra for its elementary approximants, as in [F5], proof 1.2 and 3.1. The original-adapted compensated coordinates are defined using the progressive left-step representative of Y and its drift integral (with zero assigned when that integral is not finite); on the common full event they equal the normalized coordinates. Choose increasing augmented localizers with failure probabilities at most 2−n and original elementary inverse-coefficient approximants with stopped sup-error probabilities at most 2−n at tolerance 2−n. Their unstopped sums against those original coordinates are original-adapted and converge uniformly almost surely to the constructed B. Defining the limit at each time when finite and zero otherwise gives an original-adapted version. Its increments are Brownian and independent of the earlier original sigma-algebra, a sub-sigma-algebra of the augmented one. Since Y^=Y on a common full event, this is the displayed reverse SDE with its original Borel coefficient. The assumed well-posedness and nonexplosion of the reverse martingale problem identify its law uniquely and complete the theorem.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources