Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pending
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Forward density duality identifies an auxiliary reverse process

Statement

Assume AC. Let X be a continuous Markov process on [0,T] in Rd, with positive C1,2 marginal densities pr and positive transition densities q(s,x;r,y) satisfying the marginal and Chapman–Kolmogorov identities. For each fixed (s,x), suppose the forward density equation for q(s,x;⋅,⋅) holds classically in the evolving time and state variables on (s,T]×Rd, and suppose the forward equation for p holds classically, for Lrf=br⋅∇f+12ar:D2f and its formal adjoint Lr∗. Put Drf=pr−1{Lr∗(prf)−fLr∗pr}=cr⋅∇f+12ar:D2f,cr=−br+pr−1∇ ⁣⋅(prar). Assume the displayed coefficients are Borel. On an auxiliary usual filtered probability space, let Z be a continuous Brownian Itô process with initial law pT(y)dy, drift cT−u(Zu) and bracket density aT−u(Zu); its drift and diffusion energy integrals are pathwise finite on [0,T]. Suppose there are stopping times τn↑T almost surely such that the finite measures μn(E)=E∫0τn1E(u,Zu)du are absolutely continuous with respect to spacetime Lebesgue measure. No marginal law of Z after time zero is assumed.

Then Z has the same path law as Yu=XT−u. In particular its marginal at u is pT−u and its transition kernel from u to v>u is Ku,v(y,dx)=pT−v(x)q(T−v,x;T−u,y)pT−u(y)dx. Consequently Y solves the local martingale problem for DT−u in its natural reversed filtration. The occupation condition is an explicit hypothesis of this intermediate lemma; its applicability must be proved, not inferred from density notation.

Statement references

Anderson, Section 5, printed pp. 322–324: density-duality context; the positive-mixture and occupation argument is given in full below.

Krylov, Lemma 4.1, PDF pp. 6–8: a stronger sufficient occupation estimate. That estimate is not used without proof as a supplier here; occupation absolute continuity is a stated hypothesis.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the original forward process and a separate auxiliary Itô process Z, with the hypotheses of the Statement.

[A1]

AC supplies conditional expectation and the Itô interfaces. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

The forward marginal and Chapman–Kolmogorov identities give the Bayes-reversed Markov kernels. Bayes-reversed transition kernels for a diffusion

[F2]

The auxiliary Brownian Itô process is relative to its displayed filtration, so its adapted Brownian driver has increments independent of the earlier filtration with the standard covariance. Continuous Brownian Ito processes The time-dependent Itô formula applies after compact time-state localization to a C1,2 function of a continuous Brownian Itô process. Multidimensional Ito formula for Brownian-driven processes

[F3]

A nonnegative local martingale with integrable initial value is a supermartingale: conditional Fatou applied to its stopped martingale identities proves the conditional inequality, and ordinary Fatou bounds every expectation by its initial expectation. A bounded stopped continuous local martingale is a true martingale. Tonelli transfers nonnegative event-integral inequalities to positive mixtures. Quadratic variation of a continuous local martingale Conditional fatou and dominated convergence Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product

[F4]

For a finite measure ν absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure on a bounded cylinder, bounded functions tending to zero in Lebesgue L1 tend to zero in L1(ν). Indeed, their level sets have Lebesgue measure tending to zero, the finite-measure epsilon-delta absolute-continuity condition makes their ν measures tend to zero, and splitting at a fixed small level proves the integral convergence. For finite signed or complex measures, absolute continuity is equivalent to the epsilon-delta small-set condition

[F5]

Dominated convergence, absolutely integrable Fubini, and the L1 conditional-expectation contraction justify limits of bounded event tests and integrable conditional identities. Dominated convergence Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product Conditional lp contraction

[F6]

Compact smooth cutoffs exhaust open sets; the pi-lambda theorem then extends equality of their finite-measure integrals to Borel sets. Test function cutoffs and euclidean localization Dynkin's pi-lambda theorem

[F7]

The Borel sigma-algebra of continuous path space is generated by coordinate evaluations. The supplied scalar infinite-horizon result gives the finite-horizon vector version by constant extension after T and by taking finitely many coordinate components. Thus equal finite-dimensional laws of continuous processes imply equal path laws. Borel sigma-algebra of continuous path space is generated by coordinates

Proof

Given: all hypotheses and notation in the Statement. Use forward-clock notation Br,s(y,dx)=ps(x)q(s,x;r,y)pr(y)−1dx for s<r.

1.1A1F2F3givenalgebra

Fix 0≤s<T and x. Set hs,x(r,y)=q(s,x;r,y)/pr(y) for r>s. The two classical forward equations and the exact adjoint product identity give ∂rhs,x=Drhs,x. This is C1,2 in the evolving variables, because p>0 and both density solutions are classical; it requires no joint coefficient-derivative bound. On every closed interval 0≤u≤T−s−δ, [F2] applied after spatial localization gives Hux=hs,x(T−u,Zu) a nonnegative local martingale. Its initial expectation is ∫q(s,x;T,y)dy=1, since Z0 has density pT. Thus it is a supermartingale before T−s by [F3]. This also applies at s=0, using the assumed transition density from forward time zero.

2.1F1F3step 1.1

For any Borel 0≤f≤1, put Huf=∫ps(x)f(x)Huxdx=BT−u,sf(Zu). Integrate each fixed-x supermartingale inequality against ps(x)f(x)dx, first tested on an arbitrary nonnegative bounded earlier-filtration event variable. Tonelli in [F3] proves the mixture supermartingale inequality without a common choice of conditional versions in x. The mixture lies in [0,1]. The complementary mixture H1−f is also a supermartingale and Hf+H1−f=1 by the marginal identity, so both inequalities must be equalities. Hence Hf is a true martingale on [0,T−s), and EBr,sf(ZT−r)=∫psf dx for s<r≤T. Linearity extends this identity to bounded real Borel f.

3.1F1F4F5step 2.1

Fix a compact smooth f and put Fδ(r,y)=∣Br,r−δf(y)−f(y)∣. It is bounded by 2∥f∥∞, and ∫prFδ(r,⋅)≤E∣f(Xr−δ)−f(Xr)∣. Integrating over any compact interior time interval and using continuity of X and [F5] makes this tend to zero. On every compact time-state cylinder p has a positive minimum, so Fδ→0 in local Lebesgue L1. Apply [F4] to the occupation measure μn and the time-reversed function Fδ(T−u,y), first on a bounded state cylinder and then exhausting state balls; boundedness controls the tails of the finite measure μn. Thus E∫abFδ(T−u,Zu)1u≤τndu→0 for every compact interior [a,b]. Since E(T−τn)→0 and Fδ is uniformly bounded, [F5] removes stopping. No unknown marginal of Z has been replaced by p in this argument.

4.1F5F6step 2.1step 3.1

In the expectation identity in step 2.1 take r=s+δ, multiply by any continuous time test ζ compactly supported in (0,T), and integrate over s. Step 3.1, with u=T−s−δ, permits replacement of Bs+δ,sf(ZT−s−δ) by f(ZT−s−δ). Continuity of Z and boundedness of f then let δ↓0, giving ∫ζ(s)Ef(ZT−s)ds=∫ζ(s)∫psf dxds. Both integrands are continuous in s, the second because it equals Ef(Xs), so they agree at every interior time. Compact smooth tests determine finite Borel measures by [F6]. Continuity of both processes extends the equality to s=0,T. Thus Law⁡(ZT−s)=psdx for every s.

5.1F1F5F6step 2.1step 4.1

Fix 0≤s<r≤T. The conditional martingale identity of step 2.1 gives E[Bs+δ,sf(ZT−s−δ)∣FT−rZ]=Br,sf(ZT−r). Now step 4.1 supplies the law ps+δ for the random argument on the left, so E∣Bs+δ,sf(ZT−s−δ)−f(ZT−s−δ)∣≤E∣f(Xs)−f(Xs+δ)∣→0. Continuity of Z and the L1 contraction in [F5] therefore prove E[f(ZT−s)∣FT−rZ]=Br,sf(ZT−r). First use compact smooth f, then [F6] extends to bounded Borel tests. The endpoint limit uses the marginal identity only after it has been proved in step 4.1.

6.1F1F7step 5.1

Step 5.1 identifies all Bayes transitions of Z, and its initial law is pT. The actual reversed process Y has those kernels by [F1]. Iterated conditioning gives the same finite-dimensional laws; [F7] gives the same continuous path law. It remains to transfer compact-test local martingales without completing the natural filtration Gu=σ(Yr:0≤r≤u). We specify raw-progressive compensated-test representatives below; their identities with the usual pathwise expressions hold simultaneously in time on a probability-one event. No assertion about arbitrary exceptional-path modifications of stopped processes is needed.

7.1F2F3step 6.1construct

For either process V=Y or V=Z, take its past dyadic step approximants, equal to VkT/2m on (kT/2m,(k+1)T/2m] and to V0 at zero. Define V^u as their finite vector limit when it exists, and zero otherwise. Each step process is progressive for the raw natural filtration: on [0,t] its rectangles use only coordinates at times at most t. The limit rule preserves this measurability and adaptedness. On the common continuity event, V^=V at every time, including the endpoints. For ϕ∈Cc∞, define Juϕ(V)=∫0uDT−rϕ(V^r)dr when the positive and negative integrals are both finite, and zero otherwise; parameter integration in [F3] makes this a finite progressive process, as in the drift convention of [F2]. Use the progressive compensated representative Muϕ(V)=ϕ(V^u)−ϕ(V0)−Juϕ(V).

8.1F3step 7.1construct

The following finite-prefix construction supplies literal raw stopping times even on exceptional paths. Put g(r,x)=∣cT−r(x)∣+∑i,j∣aT−r,ij(x)∣ and Au(V)=∫0ug(r,V^r)dr∈[0,∞]. It is adapted by parameter integration. Define Ku(V) as the supremum of 0, all finite Aq(V) with rational 0≤q≤u, and Au(V) if finite. This is adapted, using only countably many past coordinates of A and its current value. Pathwise, {u:Au<∞} is an initial interval containing zero. If its supremum is ζ>0, then A is continuous before ζ, and Tonelli over disjoint time intervals tending to ζ gives Aζ=lim⁡u↑ζAu=ℓ, possibly infinite (the endpoint singleton has zero time measure). If ℓ<∞, K follows A up to ζ and then stays equal to ℓ; if ℓ=∞, it tends continuously to infinity there and stays infinite. If ζ=0, every positive-time A is infinite and K≡0. The same argument includes ζ=T and the case of finite AT. Consequently K∧n is everywhere continuous and nondecreasing, with initial value zero, for every finite n.

9.1F2F3F7step 6.1step 7.1step 8.1

Set ρn(V)=inf⁡{u∈[0,T]:Ku(V)≥n}∧T, with empty infimum infinite. For u<T, continuity and monotonicity proved in step 8.1 give exactly {ρn(V)≤u}={Ku(V)≥n}; at T the stopping event is the whole space. Thus these are increasing raw-natural-filtration stopping times. For Z, its finite drift and diffusion energy imply AT(Z)<∞ almost surely: its bracket density is positive semidefinite for almost every time along almost every path, so ∑i,j∣aij∣≤dtr⁡a there. Equal continuous path laws give AT(Y)<∞ almost surely as well. On those continuity and finite-energy events, K=A, Au∧ρn≤n, and ρn=T eventually. Bounded derivatives of ϕ give ∣DT−rϕ(x)∣≤Cϕg(r,x), hence ∣Mu∧ρnϕ(V)∣≤2∥ϕ∥∞+Cϕn almost surely. The stopped values are raw-adapted and measurable: compose the progressive restriction of Mϕ on [0,u] with the measurable map ω↦(u∧ρn(ω),ω).

10.1F2F3F6F7step 6.1step 7.1step 8.1step 9.1∎

In the auxiliary usual filtration, [F2] makes Mϕ(Z) a continuous local martingale up to indistinguishability. Normalize its continuity exceptional set in that initial sigma-algebra before applying [F3]. Its stop at the already constructed ρn(Z) is bounded almost surely by step 9.1, hence a true martingale. The path integrals, clocks and stopping times above are Borel functions of a continuous coordinate path: parameter integration gives the integrals, countable suprema give K, and {ρn≤u}={Ku≥n} for u<T gives measurability of ρn; evaluation of a continuous path at a measurable time is Borel. The finite-integral convention also makes the stopped compensated functionals Borel. Equal path laws therefore transfer their event-integral martingale identities to every cylinder event {(Yr1,…,Yrk)∈H} with ri≤s, H Borel, and s≤t. For fixed s,t,n,ϕ, the events for which the identity holds form a lambda-system, because the stopped variables are integrable; these cylinders form a pi-system generating the original Gs. Thus [F6] extends the identity to every Gs event, without replacing that filtration by the one generated by Y^. Hence each Mϕ(Y)ρn(Y) is a raw martingale. Exhaustion in step 9.1 proves the local martingale problem in the stated raw natural filtration, using the specified progressive compensated representatives and no additional coefficient or filtration assumptions.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

110 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources