Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Moser stability theorem

Statement

Assume ACω. Let M be compact and let (ωt)0t1 be a smooth path of symplectic forms whose de Rham class is independent of t. Then there is a smooth isotopy ϕt:MM, ϕ0=idM, such that ϕtωt=ω0 for every t[0,1]. Here smoothness on the closed interval has its usual up-to-the-boundary meaning: in local coordinates the family is locally the restriction of a jointly smooth family on an open time neighbourhood. No symplectic or cohomology condition is imposed on such local extensions.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, compact M, and the path in the statement.

[F1]

A smooth exact family on compact M has jointly smooth primitives. Smooth parametric primitives for a smooth exact family on a compact manifold.

[F2]

The Moser contraction equation uniquely determines a smooth field and makes the pulled-back form constant. Moser pullback differentiation equation.

[F3]

Smooth time-dependent fields have unique local smooth evolutions. Time-dependent vector fields have local smooth evolution operators.

[F4]

The standard smooth step τ:R[0,1] is smooth, equals 0 on (,0], equals 1 on [1,), and is flat at both endpoints. The standard smooth step function.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Put αt=ωtω0. Constancy of the de Rham class says each αt is exact. Although [0,1] is not a boundaryless parameter manifold, the proof of [F1] constructs one fixed linear primitive operator from a finite good cover, finite spatial homotopy integrals, a finite-dimensional linear solver, and a fixed partition of unity. Apply that same operator pointwise to αt. Every one of its finite operations preserves all one-sided time derivatives and joint spatial smoothness at the closed endpoints, so λt=Rαt is smooth up to t=0,1 and satisfies dλt=αt. Put σt=λ˙t; differentiating gives dσt=ω˙t. By [F2], the equations ιXtωt=σt have a unique jointly smooth solution Xt up to both endpoints.

F1F2givenconstruct
2.1

We first put the field on a genuinely open time interval without assuming an extension of the forms. Take the step τ from [F4]. On 0<s<1 its defining quotient has positive derivative, since ddslog(β(s)/β(1s))=s2+(1s)2>0; hence it maps (0,1) diffeomorphically onto (0,1). Define Ys=τ(s)Xτ(s) for 0<s<1 and Ys=0 outside. Every derivative of τ is flat at 0,1 by [F4], while all one-sided mixed derivatives of Xt from step 1.1 are continuous on compact [0,1]×M. The product rule therefore shows that Ys is a smooth time-dependent field on the open interval R. Apply [F3] to Y. Fix the Riemannian metric used in [F1]'s construction; Ys is bounded on [0,1]×M. The distance along a trajectory between times r,s is at most its length and at most Crs, so a finite-time maximal trajectory is Cauchy. Compactness gives its limit, and [F3] at that interior time extends it. Thus the evolution ψs exists through s=1, with inverse given by reverse evolution. For 0<t<1 set ϕt=ψτ1(t), with ϕ0=id and ϕ1=ψ1. Changing variables in the coordinate integral equation for ψ shows that, on each short time interval whose trajectory lies in one chart, ϕt(p)=ϕt0(p)+t0tXu(ϕu(p))du in that chart. The integral equation and the up-to-endpoint smoothness of Xt bootstrap ϕt and its spatial derivatives to joint smoothness in (t,p) through both endpoints, despite the nonsmooth inverse of τ there. Each ϕt is a diffeomorphism, with inverse from the reverse evolution.

F1F3F4step 1.1givenconstructalgebra
3.1

The curve ϕt from step 2.1 is the evolution of Xt in the original time parameter. The pullback equation in [F2] and step 1.1 give ddt(ϕtωt)=0, hence ϕtωt=ϕ0ω0=ω0 for the entire closed interval. Empty M uses the empty isotopy.

F2step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources