How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Murnaghan stability for Kronecker coefficients
Statement
Fix partitions and work over a field of characteristic , with denoting the irreducible -module of shape (Specht modules classify the irreducibles over every field of characteristic zero). Put and, for , let be the multiplicity of in (Kronecker coefficients and the internal tensor product, Padded Kronecker coefficient sequences); set for , where the padded sequences are not partitions.
Then the sequence is eventually constant. More precisely, there is a finite set of partitions and nonnegative integers for , with for , such that for all sufficiently large and every partition . No explicit bound on the stable rank is asserted here; the sharp global bound is a separate claim.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Partitions , a field of characteristic , and the FI-module machinery over .
There is a finitely generated FI-module over with for and below; it has weight and stability degree (Each padded irreducible family is realised by a finitely generated FI-module).
The pointwise tensor product of finitely generated FI-modules is finitely generated, with ; if is generated in degree and in degree , then is generated in degree (Tensor products of finitely generated FI-modules are finitely generated).
A finitely generated FI-module over a characteristic-zero field with finite-dimensional values is uniformly representation stable, so the multiplicity of each admissible padded irreducible family is constant in a common stable range (Finite generation is equivalent to uniform representation stability, Uniform representation stability for consistent sequences of -modules).
For partitions of possibly different sizes and , the irreducible modules and of are nonisomorphic; and with the Kronecker coefficient (Kronecker coefficients and the internal tensor product, First-row padding of a partition, Specht modules classify the irreducibles over every field of characteristic zero).
Generation in a finite degree bounds the weight by : only tails with can occur (Bounded generation degree bounds surjectivity degree and weight, Weight of an FI-module over a field of characteristic zero).
Proof
By [F1] the assignment (and below the threshold) is a finitely generated FI-module over with finite-dimensional values, and likewise .
By [F2] the pointwise tensor product is finitely generated and has finite-dimensional values; at every rank where both paddings are admissible its value is . Its tensor multiplicities are the usual complex Kronecker coefficients: by the rational-model construction in Specht modules classify the irreducibles over every field of characteristic zero, . The map identifies its tensor product with the scalar extension of the rational tensor product. Extend a rational Specht decomposition to and to ; tensoring carries a finite direct sum to the same sum of extended Specht modules (by the displayed map on bases), so the two fields have identical multiplicities.
Since is finitely generated, it is generated in some finite degree . By [F5] only the finitely many partitions with can label constituents. By [F3] their multiplicities are constant from some rank onward. Increase to make all these finitely many labels admissible. Then for , where is the finite set of labels with positive multiplicity; put on and zero outside .
Put , finite because is finite. For the equality of step 3.1 holds with every , , an honest irreducible of ; and the rank- value also decomposes by [F4] as , the sum over admissible tails with , which label all partitions of uniquely by deleting their first row. By the nonisomorphism clause of [F4], the two decompositions have the same labels and multiplicities: for every partition and every , where for this says .
The case and also gives by the convention in the statement, so making larger if necessary the equality holds for all and all partitions ; this is eventual constancy with the finite support . The empty partition is included: is the trivial module, the thresholds cause no special case, and the argument did not use any bound on sharper than existence.
No choice principle is used: the FI-module suppliers are -linear constructions on finite-dimensional representation categories, the finite family and its multiplicities come from [F3], and the comparison of irreducibles in step 4.1 is a finite-dimensional decomposition statement over ; the statement is asserted for every field of characteristic .
Depends on
- Padded Kronecker coefficient sequences
- First-row padding of a partition
- Kronecker coefficients and the internal tensor product
- Each padded irreducible family is realised by a finitely generated FI-module
- Tensor products of finitely generated FI-modules are finitely generated
- Finite generation is equivalent to uniform representation stability
- Uniform representation stability for consistent sequences of $S_n$-modules
- Specht modules classify the irreducibles over every field of characteristic zero
- Bounded generation degree bounds surjectivity degree and weight
- Weight of an FI-module over a field of characteristic zero
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
49 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Thomas Church, Jordan S. Ellenberg and Benson Farb, FI-modules and stability for representations of symmetric groups, arXiv:1204.4533v4 (2014); Proposition 3.4.1 pp. 23-24, Proposition 2.3.6 p. 14, Theorem 1.13 p. 6 and its proof p. 22 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Emmanuel Briand, Rosa Orellana and Mercedes Rosas, The stability of the Kronecker product of Schur functions, arXiv:0907.4652v2 (2009); Murnaghan's theorem, p. 4 (standard reference, not scraped)