Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Uniformly bounded commuting projection for lowest-order Nedelec spaces

Statement

Assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let Ω⊂R3 be a nonempty bounded Lipschitz polyhedron and let {Th} be a shape-regular family of matching affine tetrahedral meshes with h=max⁡K∈Thdiam⁡(K)→0. For the full lowest-order spaces Eh0=Wh0,Eh1=Nh1,Eh2=Nh2,Eh3=Nh3 of Lowest-order Whitney and Nedelec de Rham spaces, there are linear projections πhk:L2Λk(Ω)→Ehk satisfying πhk∣Ehk=I and dπhk=πhk+1d on HΛk(Ω) for k=0,1,2. In degree three the exterior derivative is zero. Their norms are uniformly bounded both in L2 and in HΛk, for k=0,1,2,3.

There is also a boundary-corrected family of projections πh,0k:L2Λk(Ω)→Eh,0k, where Eh,0k=Ehk∩H0Λk(Ω) and H0Λk is the graph closure of compactly supported smooth forms. These have the same uniform bounds, are the identity on Eh,0k, and commute in degrees zero through two on the homogeneous complex; the terminal degree-three differential is zero. In particular, πh,00:H01(Ω)→Wh0∩H01(Ω),πh,01:H0(curl⁡;Ω)→Nh1∩H0(curl⁡;Ω),∇πh,00=πh,01∇. Here the zero tangential space uses Zero tangential trace H(curl) space. Each family converges strongly in L2 on every L2 form, uniformly on compact L2 subsets, and in the graph norm on its corresponding graph domain. The full and homogeneous families are separate operators. These are cochain projections; canonical edge moments are not asserted bounded on H(curl⁡).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; the full and homogeneous complexes, the mesh hypotheses above, and the averaged-pullback construction and correction in Finite element correction and strong convergence of Whitney cochain projections.

[F1]

The corrected averaged-pullback maps are uniformly bounded full and homogeneous commuting projections, with strong and compact-uniform L2 convergence and graph convergence. (Finite element correction and strong convergence of Whitney cochain projections)

Choice use. Countable Choice is inherited solely from the proved coefficient L2 density/completeness, smoothing and change-of-variables inputs carried by [F1]. The construction makes only finite geometric choices and uses no arbitrary-index choice. It does not consume the regular-decomposition theorem.

Proof

1.1F1givenconstruct

Use the inward averaged-pullback moments, finite element inverse correction, and notation πhk=πh+,k of [F1]. The degree identifications give respectively H1, H(curl⁡), H(div⁡), and L2 as the four graph spaces. The projection and commutation identities and all stated full-space bounds follow from [F1]. No contractibility or regular-decomposition hypothesis enters this construction.

2.1F1step 1.1construct∎

For the homogeneous family use the outward averaged-pullback moments of the zero extension and their separate finite element correction, writing πh,0k=πh−,k. The proof of [F1] identifies its target with zero boundary moments and with Ehk∩H0Λk. Consequently its degree-zero and degree-one targets are precisely the two stated homogeneous finite element spaces, and commutation gives the displayed gradient identity and the relative curl and divergence identities. Its bounds and convergence follow from [F1].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources