Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An explicit PEC standing wave in the unit cube

Example

Let Ω=(0,1)3 and let ϵ,μ>0 be constant. The field E(x,y,z)=(0,0,sin⁡(πx)sin⁡(πy)) is a nonzero PEC Maxwell eigenfield with eigenvalue λ=2π2/(ϵμ). It belongs to the full-kernel quotient gauge, and the spectral approximation theorem places this eigenvalue in a convergent discrete edge-element cluster. No claim is made that this eigenvalue is simple.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Axiom of Choice, Countable Choice, Dependent Choice, the unit cube, positive constants ϵ,μ, the real PEC curl-curl formulation and its full-kernel quotient gauge, and a shape-regular refining family {Thn}n≥1 of matching affine tetrahedral meshes with hn→0. Assume the three supplier statements on regular decomposition (Regular decomposition of zero-tangential H(curl) fields), discrete compactness (Discrete compactness and uniform Poincare inequality for Nedelec fields) and uniformly bounded commuting cochain projections (Uniformly bounded commuting projection for lowest-order Nedelec spaces) hold for this exact domain, PEC boundary convention and mesh family.

[F1]

The eigenrelation is (μ−1curl⁡E,curl⁡v)L2=λ(E,v)ϵ for every v in the gauge space. (PEC Maxwell cavity eigenproblem and full-kernel gauge)

[F2]

Compactly supported smooth vector fields are dense in H0(curl⁡) in the graph norm. This is the zero-tangential space's closure definition. (Zero tangential trace H(curl) space)

[F3]

The spectral approximation theorem gives full-multiplicity cluster convergence and no positive spectral pollution under its declared suppliers. (Spectral convergence and no nonzero pollution for PEC edge elements)

[F4]

Countable Choice is inherited through the theorem's compact spectral supplier; the item also retains its explicitly declared AC and DC branches. (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain)

[F5]

The compact coercive solution operator has isolated positive eigenvalues of finite multiplicity. (Discrete spectrum and min–max principle for a compact coercive form)

Verification

1.1F2givenconstructalgebra

Put f(x,y)=sin⁡(πx)sin⁡(πy). On the faces x=0,1 and y=0,1, E=0, so its tangential component vanishes there; on z=0,1, E is normal. To verify the closure convention in [F2], choose a smooth one-variable cutoff θδ which is zero within distance δ of 0,1, one beyond distance 2δ, and has derivative bounded by C/δ. Let χδ(x,y,z)=θδ(x)θδ(y)θδ(z). Then Eδ=χδE∈Cc∞(Ω;R3) and curl⁡(Eδ−E)=∇χδ×E+(χδ−1)curl⁡E. The z-derivative term in the cross product is zero because it is parallel to E; on an x- or y-boundary layer, the corresponding sine factor is O(δ) and cancels the O(δ−1) cutoff derivative. The remaining terms are bounded and supported in a layer of volume O(δ), so their L2 norms tend to zero. Also Eδ→E in L2. Thus E∈H0(curl⁡).

1.2F1F2givenalgebra

Direct differentiation gives div⁡E=0, curl⁡E=(πsin⁡(πx)cos⁡(πy),−πcos⁡(πx)sin⁡(πy),0), and curl⁡curl⁡E=2π2E. For every compactly supported smooth test field v, distributional integration by parts yields (curl⁡E,curl⁡v)L2=(curl⁡curl⁡E,v)L2. By [F2] and continuity of both pairings, the identity extends to all v∈H0(curl⁡). Hence [F1] holds with λ=2π2/(ϵμ). Testing that identity with any k∈K gives 0=λ(E,k)ϵ, so E⊥K and E∈X.

2.1F3F4F5step 1.2∎

The eigenvalue is positive and the field is nonzero. By [F3], its full continuous eigenspace cluster is approximated with its actual multiplicity; the argument makes no selection of an individual limiting discrete eigenvector.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

66 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.