Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Under Dependent Choice, continuous nowhere differentiable functions form a dense subset of C([0,1],R)C([0,1],\mathbb R)

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice (DC\mathrm{DC}). Then the set of continuous functions [0,1]R[0,1]\to\mathbb R having no finite two-sided derivative at an interior point and no finite one-sided derivative at either endpoint is dense in C([0,1],R)C([0,1],\mathbb R) for the supremum metric.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Dependent Choice (DC\mathrm{DC}); for p,qN>0p,q\in\mathbb N_{>0}, Ep,qE_{p,q} is the fixed local-Lipschitz set of Functions satisfying a fixed local Lipschitz bound somewhere form a closed subset of C([0,1])C([0,1]).

[L2]

Polygonal functions whose nonvertex slopes exceed any prescribed bound are dense (Polygonal functions with sufficiently steep nonvertex slopes are dense in C([0,1])C([0,1])).

[L3]

C([0,1],R)C([0,1],\mathbb R) is a nonempty complete metric space in the supremum metric (C(K,R)C(K,\mathbb{R}) is complete in the supremum metric for every nonempty compact metric space KK).

[L5]

Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice (DC\mathrm{DC}). The intersection of countably many open dense subsets of a nonempty complete metric space is dense (Under Dependent Choice, a nonempty complete metric space is not a countable union of closed sets with empty interior).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Each Ep,qE_{p,q} has empty interior. Indeed, every supremum ball contains by [L2] a polygonal hh all of whose nonvertex slopes have absolute value greater than pp; at any point, including a vertex or endpoint, a sufficiently nearby point on an adjacent affine piece violates the defining pp-bound.

L2givenalgebra
1.2

If fGf\in G had a finite derivative at aa, [L4] would bound its difference quotients by some integer pp on a sufficiently small radius 1/q1/q, placing ff in Ep,qE_{p,q}; this contradicts fGf\in G.

L4givenalgebra
2.1

Hence every C([0,1])Ep,qC([0,1])\setminus E_{p,q} is open and dense by [L1].

L1step 1.1algebra
3.1

Apply [L5] to the complete space of [L3]. The intersection G=p,q1(C([0,1])Ep,q)G=\bigcap_{p,q\ge1}(C([0,1])\setminus E_{p,q}) is dense.

L3step 2.1L5
4.1

Thus GG is a dense subset of the continuous nowhere-differentiable functions, which proves the statement.

step 3.1step 1.2algebra

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 79 results over 17 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources