How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Poisson-equation martingale decomposition and MCMC CLT
Statement
Assume AC. Let be a stationary time-homogeneous Markov chain with invariant probability , natural filtration , and ergodic canonical path shift. Let be real Borel with and (The space as the quotient by null functions). Suppose there is a measurable such that -almost everywhere, where . Put and . Then for every , and including the degenerate case . If additionally , then so this CLT's variance equals the covariance long-run variance of Long-run variance for a stationary Markov chain.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, a stationary Markov chain with invariant probability , natural filtration , ergodic canonical shift, centered real , and a solution of -almost everywhere.
AC is the choice principle for the conditional-expectation classes used below. (The Axiom of Choice)
For , is square-integrable, has conditional mean zero, and conditional variance . (Kernel conditional expectations for square-integrable Markov observables)
For a stationary ergodic process , its averages converge almost surely to . (Birkhoff limit for a stationary integrable process)
A square-integrable martingale-difference array with terminal conditional variance clock converging to in probability and vanishing unconditional Lindeberg sums has terminal sum converging in distribution to . (Martingale central limit theorem)
For square-integrable real random variables, variance is the second centered moment and covariance is the centered product expectation. (Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space)
When the covariance series is absolutely convergent and the CLT is established, the covariance long-run variance is the sum . (Long-run variance for a stationary Markov chain)
A known measurable factor can be taken out of conditional expectation when products are integrable; Hölder bounds products of variables by their norms. (Taking out what is known, Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases)
If and in probability, then . (Converging together lemma)
Dominated convergence passes limits through the integrals used below. (Dominated convergence)
Convergence to zero in implies convergence to zero in probability. ( convergence implies convergence in probability)
The canonical path law is shifted by the coordinate left shift; ergodic means the shift preserves the law and every invariant event has probability zero or one. (Canonical Markov chain on path space, Measure-preserving transformations and systems, Ergodicity relative to an invariant measure)
A continuous scaling map sends weak convergence to the correspondingly scaled limiting law. (Continuous mapping theorem)
Proof
By [F1], each is a square-integrable martingale difference, so . Since -almost everywhere and each has law , the identity holds at every simultaneously outside a countable union of null events. Therefore almost surely.
Set on the -full set where these terms are finite, and set elsewhere. By [F1], is the conditional variance of , is nonnegative, and . Thus . The process is a measurable factor of the stationary ergodic path process : the inverse image of any shift-invariant event for is shift-invariant for . Hence it too is stationary and ergodic by [F10], and [F2] gives almost surely.
Stationarity and give . The -norm of the endpoint divided by therefore tends to zero, so [F9] gives convergence to zero in probability.
Summing step 1.1 for cancels the intermediate terms and yields , where .
Suppose . For row , set for , set for , and use for every . These are square-integrable martingale-difference rows by step 1.1. Their terminal variance clock is almost surely by step 1.2. For every , stationarity of the transition pairs gives by [F8], since is integrable. Extending each row by zeros makes it an infinite array with the same terminal sum and clock. Therefore [F3] gives ; scaling by using [F11] yields .
If , stationarity and [F1] imply , so almost surely and hence . By step 2.1, . Step 1.3 shows in probability; [F7] then gives convergence to the point mass .
If , step 2.2 gives . Combining this with step 1.3, the decomposition in step 2.1, and [F7] gives .
Assume additionally that the covariance series is absolutely convergent. Stationarity and expansion of the finite square give , where ; [F8] applies to the series because is summable. On the other hand, step 2.1 writes with . For , is -measurable and , so [F1, F6] give . Stationarity gives . Also and [F6] gives . Dividing by therefore shows that its limit is . Steps 3.1 and 3.2 give the CLT, so [F5] identifies its variance with the displayed covariance sum.
Source notes
The decomposition is proved directly by telescoping. The CLT uses the conditional-variance ergodic theorem and the stated martingale-array CLT; finite variance of alone is not used as a CLT criterion. The covariance formula is proved only in the stated Poisson-equation case.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Canonical Markov chain on path space
- Ergodicity relative to an invariant measure
- Invariant and stationary distribution for a Markov kernel
- The space $L^p(\mu)$ as the quotient by null functions
- Long-run variance for a stationary Markov chain
- Measure-preserving transformations and systems
- Measure kernel and probability kernel
- Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space
- Time-homogeneous Markov chain with transition kernel
- Kernel conditional expectations for square-integrable Markov observables
- Converging together lemma
- Continuous mapping theorem
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
- Martingale central limit theorem
- Dominated convergence
- $L^p$ convergence implies convergence in probability
- Birkhoff limit for a stationary integrable process
- Taking out what is known
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
77 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles J. Geyer, Markov Chain Monte Carlo Lecture Notes, §4.8.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gareth O. Roberts and Jeffrey S. Rosenthal, General State Space Markov Chains and MCMC Algorithms, §5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Galin L. Jones, On the Markov Chain Central Limit Theorem, §4 (standard reference, not scraped)