How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Under AC, the finite-second-moment posterior mean uniquely minimizes squared risk
Statement
Assume AC. Let be a probability kernel from a measurable data space to , and take the action space to be with its Borel sigma-algebra. Put Then , is measurable on , and for every , is the unique action minimizing the finite squared posterior risk over . Thus is a measurable Bayes action rule on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, the posterior probability kernel , and the finite-second-moment data domain .
The Axiom of Choice asserts that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function. The Axiom of Choice
Under AC, conditional expectation is the orthogonal projection onto the square-integrable functions measurable with respect to the conditioning sigma-algebra, with a unique minimizing almost-sure class. Conditional expectation is the l2 orthogonal projection
A conditional expectation version is an integrable measurable function satisfying the integral identity on every conditioning event. Conditional expectation given a sigma algebra
A Bayes action rule must be measurable, have finite posterior risk, and attain the minimum among finite-risk actions. Finite posterior risk and Bayes action rule
Integrating a product-measurable nonnegative function against a probability kernel gives a measurable function; an integrable signed function has a measurable signed integral on its finite-absolute-integral domain. Measurability of integration against a kernel
A real random variable is a measurable map into with its Borel sigma-algebra. Random elements and real random variables
Proof
Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.
The squared loss is continuous on , hence product-Borel measurable as required by [F3]. Let . The function is product-measurable, so [F4] makes measurable and measurable. On , gives a finite absolute first moment; [F4] therefore makes the signed mean measurable on .
Fix and use as a probability space with trivial sub-sigma-algebra . The identity variable is a real random variable by [F5] and is square-integrable. The constant function is -measurable and satisfies for both possible ; by [F2] it is a conditional-expectation version.
By [F1] under [A1], this conditional expectation uniquely minimizes squared distance over . The real-valued -measurable functions are exactly constants, and every finite constant is in ; hence uniquely minimizes over all real actions. This risk is finite because both and the constant action are square-integrable.
By step 1.1 the mean rule is measurable on , and by step 2.1 it has finite risk and attains the minimum on every fiber. The definition [F3] therefore makes it a Bayes action rule on .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ryan Martin, Lecture Notes on Advanced Statistical Theory, §5.3.1, PDF pp. 104–105 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Andrew Gelman et al., Bayesian Data Analysis, 3rd ed., §9.1 (standard reference, not scraped)