How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite posterior risk and Bayes action rule
Definition
Let have a supplied posterior probability kernel , let be a measurable action space, and let be a measurable function on the product measurable space The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates, in the sense of A measurable function between measurable spaces. This strengthens the section-measurability convention in Loss functions and risk so that posterior integrals vary measurably with measurable action rules.
For a fixed data fiber and action , define the posterior risk only when A pointwise Bayes action at is a finite-risk action attaining the minimum among all finite-risk actions. On a declared measurable data domain , a Bayes action rule is a measurable map whose finite posterior risk attains that minimum at every . This definition makes no assertion that finite-risk actions or measurable minimizing rules always exist. It therefore does not infer a Bayes action merely from the existence of an infimum. The sampling risk in Loss functions and risk is a different integral, taken over the data law at a fixed parameter.
Depends on
Used by
- A continuous density mode need not distinguish exact zero–one actions Example
- Asymmetric loss can change the posterior-optimal action Example
- A maximal-mass action is Bayes under finite-class zero–one loss Theorem
- Every posterior median minimizes absolute risk when the first absolute moment is finite Theorem
- Under AC, the finite-second-moment posterior mean uniquely minimizes squared risk Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andrew Gelman et al., Bayesian Data Analysis, 3rd ed., §9.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ryan Martin, Lecture Notes on Advanced Statistical Theory, §5.3.1, PDF pp. 104–105 (standard reference, not scraped)