How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Conservative second-order error
Statement
Let be finite-dimensional, let be self-adjoint with , put and . For every real and integer , where is the palindromic product of Symmetric second-order product formula and is the finite-matrix evolution of Finite Hermitian matrix dynamics.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite-dimensional space , self-adjoint terms , , , and .
Unitary and differential identities for finite matrix dynamics states that each term evolution is unitary, differentiable with derivative , and satisfies the time-composition law.
Symmetric second-order product formula defines the palindromic product with two half-time factors for every term except the middle term.
The operator norm is submultiplicative and satisfies ||T^*T|| = ||T||^2 gives the submultiplicative operator norm.
The operator norm is zero on the zero domain and otherwise is max_{||v||=1} ||Tv|| defines the operator norm by the maximum over unit vectors.
In this proof, means there are constants with whenever .
Proof
The claim is immediate on the zero-dimensional space, so assume . Write , , , and . Every factor is unitary by [F1], and the palindromic word gives ; also . Differentiating the factors at zero, the two occurrences with coefficient contribute a total coefficient for each , so and .
Let . Smoothness follows by repeatedly differentiating the constant-generator identity in [F1]. Thus for some endomorphism by [L1]. The inverse identities in step 1.1 give . Since both inverse factors equal , comparing degree-two coefficients yields , hence . Therefore and have matching Taylor coefficients through degree two.
Write in its displayed order, with and the coefficients equal to the half-step palindrome in [F2]. Repeated product differentiation and [F1] give : each occurs twice with coefficient , and occurs once with coefficient . Also . For a unit vector , the vector triangle inequality gives , so [F4] yields . Then [F3], [F4], and unitarity give . The integral Taylor remainder after degree two therefore gives .
Expand by telescoping. The definition [F4] and submultiplicativity [F3] show that unitary factors preserve the norm, so its norm is at most by [step 3.1]. With , this is ; [F1] gives .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andrew M. Childs, Lecture Notes on Quantum Algorithms (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ronald de Wolf, Quantum Computing: Lecture Notes (standard reference, not scraped)