Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Conservative second-order error

Statement

Let V be finite-dimensional, let H1,…,Hm be self-adjoint with m≥1, put H=∑jHj and M=∑j∥Hj∥. For every real t and integer r≥1, ∥S2(t/r)r−UH(t)∥≤∣t∣3M33r2, where S2 is the palindromic product of Symmetric second-order product formula and UH is the finite-matrix evolution of Finite Hermitian matrix dynamics.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite-dimensional space V, self-adjoint terms H1,…,Hm, m≥1, t∈R, and r≥1.

[F1]

Unitary and differential identities for finite matrix dynamics states that each term evolution is unitary, differentiable with derivative −iHjUHj(s), and satisfies the time-composition law.

[F2]

Symmetric second-order product formula defines the palindromic product with two half-time factors for every term except the middle term.

[F4]

The operator norm is zero on the zero domain and otherwise is max_{||v||=1} ||Tv|| defines the operator norm by the maximum over unit vectors.

[L1]

In this proof, R(h)=O(ha) means there are constants C,δ>0 with ∥R(h)∥≤C∣h∣a whenever ∣h∣<δ.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2algebra

The claim is immediate on the zero-dimensional space, so assume V≠{0}. Write Aj=−iHj, A=∑jAj, P(h)=S2(h), and Q(h)=UH(h). Every factor is unitary by [F1], and the palindromic word gives P(−h)=P(h)−1; also Q(−h)=Q(h)−1. Differentiating the factors at zero, the two occurrences with coefficient 1/2 contribute a total coefficient 1 for each Aj, so P(0)=Q(0)=I and P′(0)=Q′(0)=A.

2.1step 1.1F1L1algebra

Let E(h)=P(h)−Q(h). Smoothness follows by repeatedly differentiating the constant-generator identity in [F1]. Thus E(h)=Ch2+O(h3) for some endomorphism C by [L1]. The inverse identities in step 1.1 give E(−h)=P(h)−1−Q(h)−1=−P(h)−1E(h)Q(h)−1. Since both inverse factors equal I+O(h), comparing degree-two coefficients yields C=−C, hence C=0. Therefore P and Q have matching Taylor coefficients through degree two.

3.1step 2.1F1F2F3F4algebra

Write P(h)=F1(h)⋯F2m−1(h) in its displayed order, with Fℓ(h)=ecℓhAjℓ and the coefficients cℓ equal to the half-step palindrome in [F2]. Repeated product differentiation and [F1] give ∥P′′′(h)∥≤(∑ℓ∣cℓ∣∥Hjℓ∥)3=M3: each j<m occurs twice with coefficient 1/2, and j=m occurs once with coefficient 1. Also Q′′′(h)=A3Q(h). For a unit vector v, the vector triangle inequality gives ∥Av∥≤∑j∥Hjv∥≤∑j∥Hj∥=M, so [F4] yields ∥A∥≤M. Then [F3], [F4], and unitarity give ∥Q′′′(h)∥≤M3. The integral Taylor remainder after degree two therefore gives ∥P(h)−Q(h)∥≤(2M3)∣h∣3/3!=M3∣h∣3/3.

4.1step 3.1F1F3F4algebra∎

Expand P(h)r−Q(h)r by telescoping. The definition [F4] and submultiplicativity [F3] show that unitary factors preserve the norm, so its norm is at most rM3∣h∣3/3 by [step 3.1]. With h=t/r, this is ∣t∣3M3/(3r2); [F1] gives Q(h)r=UH(t).

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources