Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Unitary and differential identities for finite matrix dynamics

Statement

Let H be a self-adjoint endomorphism of a finite-dimensional complex inner-product space V. For real t,s, the evolution from Finite Hermitian matrix dynamics satisfies UH(0)=IV,UH(t)∗UH(t)=IV,UH(t+s)=UH(t)UH(s),ddtUH(t)=−iHUH(t). Moreover, UH is the unique differentiable map Y:R→End⁡(V) satisfying Y′(t)=−iHY(t) and Y(0)=IV.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite-dimensional complex inner-product space V and a self-adjoint endomorphism H:V→V.

[F2]
[F3]

Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length: the complex inner product is linear in its first argument and conjugate-linear in its second.

[F4]

Complex spectral theorem: a normal endomorphism of a finite-dimensional complex inner product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis, and conversely: a normal endomorphism of a finite-dimensional complex inner-product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis.

[F5]

The spectral functional calculus f(T) for a normal endomorphism: if T=∑jλjPj is its spectral resolution, then f(T)=∑jf(λj)Pj.

[F6]

exp⁡(z+w)=exp⁡z exp⁡w, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential: exp⁡(z+w)=exp⁡(z)exp⁡(w) for complex z,w.

[F8]

The complex exponential is entire and its complex derivative is itself: exp⁡′(z)=exp⁡(z) for every z∈C.

[F9]

The mean value theorem, as the case g(x)=x of Cauchy's: for f continuous on [a,b] with a<b and differentiable on (a,b) there is c∈(a,b) with f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a): for a real function continuous on [a,b] and differentiable on (a,b), there is c∈(a,b) with f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a).

[F11]

The complex exponential by its power series defines exp⁡z=∑n=0∞zn/n!, with the natural factorial embedded into the complex field. The power recursion in Integer powers in the complex field gives 00=1 and 0n=0 for n≥1, and The factorial n! and the falling factorial nk‾, defined by recursion in N gives 0!=1.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF1F2F3F4algebra

If Hv=λv with v≠0, then self-adjointness gives λ⟨v,v⟩=⟨Hv,v⟩=⟨v,Hv⟩=λ‾⟨v,v⟩ by [F1]–[F3], so every eigenvalue λ is real. Since H is self-adjoint it is normal, and [F4] supplies an orthonormal eigenbasis. In dimension zero the assertions below hold for the unique endomorphism.

2.1step 1.1F4F5F11algebra

Write the spectral resolution H=∑λλPλ over distinct eigenvalues. The projections satisfy Pλ∗=Pλ, PλPμ=0 for λ≠μ, and ∑λPλ=IV. Definition Finite Hermitian matrix dynamics is the functional-calculus sum in [F5]. By [F11], at z=0 the exponential series has first term 1 and every later term 0, so every partial sum is 1 and e0=1.

3.1step 2.1F7algebra

The adjoint of this sum is UH(t)∗=∑λeitλPλ. Thus UH(t)∗UH(t)=∑λ∣e−itλ∣2Pλ=∑λPλ=IV, since tλ is real and [F7] gives ∣e−itλ∣=e0=1 by step 2.1. At t=0 every coefficient is 1 by step 2.1, so UH(0)=IV.

3.2step 2.1F6algebra

The product UH(t)UH(s) has coefficient e−itλe−isλ=e−i(t+s)λ on each Pλ by [F6]; all cross terms vanish by orthogonality. Hence UH(t+s)=UH(t)UH(s).

3.3step 2.1F6F8algebra

For each real eigenvalue λ, the difference quotient of t↦e−itλ at t equals e−itλ(e−iλh−1)/h by [F6]. If λ≠0, set z=−iλh and use [F8] at 0, together with e0=1 from step 2.1, to obtain the limit −iλe−itλ; if λ=0, the quotient is identically zero. The spectral sum is finite, so differentiating it term by term gives UH′(t)=∑λ(−iλ)e−itλPλ=−iHUH(t).

4.1givenF4F6F8F9F10step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Let Y be any differentiable solution with Y(0)=IV. Write its entries in the orthonormal eigenbasis from step 1.1 as yjk(t). Taking each matrix coordinate of the difference quotient for Y′(t)=−iHY(t) gives yjk′(t)=−iλjyjk(t). Put qj(t):=eiλjt. By [F6], for h≠0, qj(t+h)−qj(t)h=eiλjteiλjh−1h. If λj=0, this quotient is zero. Otherwise set z=iλjh; [F8] at 0, with e0=1 from step 2.1, gives lim⁡z→0(ez−1)/z=1, and hence qj′(t)=iλjqj(t). The real and imaginary parts of yjk and qj are differentiable. Since Re⁡(qjyjk)=(Re⁡qj)(Re⁡yjk)−(Im⁡qj)(Im⁡yjk) and Im⁡(qjyjk)=(Re⁡qj)(Im⁡yjk)+(Im⁡qj)(Re⁡yjk), the real product rule [F10] gives the complex product rule. Thus gjk(t):=qj(t)yjk(t) is differentiable and gjk′(t)=qj′(t)yjk(t)+qj(t)yjk′(t)=0. Each real-valued component h of gjk is therefore differentiable on R with derivative zero. It is continuous at every c: for x≠c, h(x)−h(c)=h(x)−h(c)x−c(x−c), and the difference quotient tends to the finite value h′(c), so it is bounded near c and the product tends to zero. Thus both components are continuous on every [a,b] and differentiable on (a,b). Applying [F9] to each component on any a<b shows both are constant on R. Since qj(0)=1 by step 2.1 and Y(0)=IV, gjk(0)=δjk; therefore yjk(t)=δjke−iλjt by [F6]. Thus Y(t)=UH(t). The zero-dimensional case has only one endomorphism and is unique as well.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

71 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources