Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Real bounded polynomial extraction in QSVT

Statement

Let A:HR→HL be a finite PUE map and let p∈R[x] have degree at most d, parity d mod 2, and ∣p(x)∣≤1 on [−1,1]. The exact real-polynomial completion and phase-factorization results give a phase list Φ whose scalar QSP polynomial satisfies Re⁡PΦ=p. Run the degree-d QSVT sequence with a control qubit prepared in ∣+⟩, using the phase lists Φ and −Φ in its two branches, and project the control back onto ∣+⟩. The resulting compressed block is exactly poddSV(A) for odd d, and exactly pRSV(A) for even d, including the even value p(0) on ker⁡A. The result includes d=0, zero and unit singular values, repeated values, and unmatched kernels.

The two branches share the same d unconditioned alternating calls to U and U∗. Each of the d+1 projector-phase slots uses two controlled-reflection calls for its phase gadget and one branch-controlled one-qubit rotation; the controlled-rotation and reflection-access costs are charged separately. No controlled signal call is needed for the Φ/−Φ selector. Phase-list generation and any finite-gate compilation remain separately charged.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite PUE map A, an integer d≥0, and a real polynomial p with the stated degree, parity, and interval bound.

[F1]

Completion of a bounded real parity polynomial: such a p has a QSP-admissible pair P,Q with Re⁡P=p exactly.

[F2]

Constructive factorization of an admissible QSP polynomial pair: every QSP-admissible pair has a real phase list whose ordered signal product has the pair's upper-left polynomial.

[F3]

QSP signal matrix and ordered phase sequence: WR(x) is real and Z(ϕ)=diag⁡(eiϕ,e−iϕ), with UΦ=Z(ϕ0)∏j=1d(WRZ(ϕj)).

[F4]

QSVT action on singular subspaces: an exact phase list acts on each positive singular pair by its scalar polynomial; odd compression annihilates the right kernel, while even right compression acts on it by the scalar value at zero.

[F5]

Projector phase operations from controlled reflections: the clean-ancilla toggle XΠ=HC(SΠ)H flips exactly on ran⁡Π and is implemented with one controlled-reflection call plus a fixed ancilla gate.

[F6]

Quantum singular-value transformation circuit: the chronological procedure alternates the supplied U and U∗ calls, switching the projected side after each call, and interleaves the declared projector phases.

[F7]

QSVT signal and reflection query counts: a degree-d sequence has d signal calls and d+1 projector-phase slots; the Φ/−Φ selector shares the signal list and uses one unconditional and one branch-controlled rotation per slot.

[F8]

Every linear map between finite-dimensional real or complex inner product spaces admits a singular value decomposition: the positive singular pairs are orthonormal, and the right singular vectors together with a basis of ker⁡A form an orthonormal basis of HR.

[F9]

Controlled Unitary Access: a controlled operation is explicitly supplied and separately costed.

[F10]

Denotational semantics of a finite layered circuit: chronological circuit layers compose in reverse order in the denoted operator product.

Proof

1.1F1F2givenchoose

By [F1], choose a QSP-admissible pair P,Q with Re⁡P=p. By [F2], choose a phase list Φ whose ordered signal product has upper-left entry PΦ=P. The real part identity is therefore exact for every real x.

1.2F5F6F7F10givenalgebra

Let control value 0 select Φ and value 1 select −Φ. In each slot with phase ϕ about Π, apply the toggle XΠ from [F5], then unconditional Rz(2ϕ), then a control-one-controlled Rz(−4ϕ), and then XΠ again. In branch 0 the middle rotation is Rz(2ϕ); in branch 1 it is Rz(−2ϕ). The toggle places the clean ancilla in ∣1⟩ on ran⁡Π and in ∣0⟩ on ker⁡Π, so the two system phases are eiϕ(2Π−I) and e−iϕ(2Π−I), respectively, with the ancilla returned to ∣0⟩. Thus each slot realizes the required Φ/−Φ phase pair. By [F6] and [F10], the signal calls between slots are shared unconditioned calls, and the full controlled unitary has branch operators UΦ and U−Φ. Projecting ∣+⟩ to ∣+⟩ gives their arithmetic mean, since ⟨+∣b⟩⟨b∣+⟩=1/2 for each b∈{0,1}.

2.1F3step 1.1algebra

Since each entry of WR(x) is real and Z(ϕ)‾=Z(−ϕ), entrywise conjugation of the ordered product in [F3] gives U−Φ(x)=UΦ(x)‾. Thus its upper-left polynomial is P−Φ(x)=PΦ(x)‾ for every x∈[−1,1].

3.1F1F4F8step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1algebra

Fix a positive singular pair (σj,vj,uj). By [F4], the two branch compressions contribute coefficients PΦ(σj) and P−Φ(σj). Their mean is Re⁡PΦ(σj)=p(σj) by steps 1.1–2.1. For even d, [F4] gives the same mean p(0) on each vector in ker⁡A; for odd d, p(0)=0 and the output block annihilates that kernel. Thus the averaged compression has exactly the stated singular-value transform on all of HR.

4.1F5F6F7F9step 1.2algebra∎

There are d alternating signal positions and d+1 phase slots by [F7]. The signal list is unconditioned and shared. At each slot, the two toggles use two controlled-reflection calls, and the middle uses one unconditional Rz(2ϕ) plus one branch-controlled Rz(−4ϕ). By [F9], the controlled rotations and reflection calls are supplied and costed separately. For d=0, there is one paired phase slot and no signal call, so the same count applies.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources