How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
SDP matrix-expectation estimation error and cost
Statement
Let with , and let the coherent signed sampler from Coherent SDP matrix-expectation oracle be supplied. For additive tolerance and failure , supply rational and , and run that procedure at inputs . The QA29 estimator returns an estimate of within with probability at least in either declared QA13 access mode. In repeated controlled- access it uses coherent sampler/reflection rounds; in supplied controlled-power access sum the separately declared power-query costs. When the supplied purification is itself an approximate Gibbs purification at vector error , the expectation bias is at most ; use its rational sampling tolerance to keep total error at most . In an SDP iteration, use a union bound across all observables and charge each Gibbs preparation/inverse, observable access, controlled call, and state/phase implementation.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The signed variable lies in , QA29's expectation guarantee, and the purification error bound. The sampler/reflection-round bound uses repeated controlled- access; the accuracy and bias assertions permit either declared access mode.
Coherent SDP matrix-expectation oracle: the encoded variable has mean and range .
Quantum bounded-expectation guarantee and query cost: for an encoded variable in , error and failure , the median estimator has error with probability in either mode and query order in repeated controlled- access. Supplied controlled-power access instead charges its actual power queries separately.
Gibbs purification error and resource bound: vector error bounds the conditional purification deviation.
Cauchy–Schwarz: , with equality exactly for linearly dependent vectors: in finite-dimensional complex inner-product spaces.
Dirac Notation Conversion identifies Dirac pairings with the root inner product; The operator norm is zero on the zero domain and otherwise is max_{||v||=1} ||Tv|| gives .
Proof
Apply [F2] to the interval with rational tolerance and rational failure budget ; its interval width is , so it returns the approximate-purification mean estimate within with probability at least and, in repeated controlled- access, uses coherent rounds, since and . In supplied-power access the same accuracy holds with the separately priced power-query implementation in [F2].
For unit vectors and a contraction , expand . Cauchy–Schwarz [F4], the Dirac conversion and operator norm [F5], and unit norms bound its absolute value by . Thus the chosen rational tolerance gives total error at most when the target is the ideal Gibbs mean; a union bound makes simultaneous estimates fail with probability at most the sum of their declared failure budgets.
Depends on
- Coherent SDP matrix-expectation oracle
- Quantum bounded-expectation guarantee and query cost
- Gibbs purification error and resource bound
- Cauchy–Schwarz: $|\langle u,v\rangle|\leq\lVert u\rVert\lVert v\rVert$, with equality exactly for linearly dependent vectors
- Dirac Notation Conversion
- The operator norm is zero on the zero domain and otherwise is max_{||v||=1} ||Tv||
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
51 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- https://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.01843v4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- https://arxiv.org/pdf/1504.06987v3 (standard reference, not scraped)