Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Certified B6 block-pair search terminates

Statement

Assume ACω. For every certified Cauchy input pair (T5,T8)∈SU(5)×SU(8) and every positive rational ε, the exhaustive compiler of Exhaustive certified Fibonacci B6 block-pair search halts with one six-strand Fibonacci braid word whose normalized total-charge-1 and total-charge-τ matrices are each within operator norm ε of T5,T8, respectively. Density proves termination, but this result gives no useful joint-block word-length or search-time bound.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The normalized B6 representation, ACω, certified Cauchy names for T5,T8, and rational ε>0.

[F1]

The joint closure of the normalized B6 image contains SU(5)×SU(8) under ACω. Joint SU(5)×SU(8) closure from B6 path blocks

[F2]

Each target name returns rational complex matrices converging entrywise with the stated certified precision. Certified fixed-dimensional special-unitary input

[F3]

The compiler enumerates every finite B6 word and dovetails all precision levels. Its rational interval procedure and target-name requests supply the stated coordinate approximants, and it returns exactly when both displayed rational tests pass. Exhaustive certified Fibonacci B6 block-pair search

[F4]

For a d×d matrix, ∥A∥F≤d∥A∥op, and ∥A∥op≤∥A∥F. Spectral and Frobenius norms are unitarily invariant, are given by singular values, and satisfy the sharp rank comparison

[A1]

Assume exactly ACω as used by [F1]. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

Proof

1.1F2F3F4givenalgebra

Fix any word and precision inspected by [F3]. For a d×d complex matrix whose real and imaginary entry coordinates have errors at most 2−p, summing their squares bounds the Frobenius error by d2 2−p. The word and target approximants from [F2]--[F3] thus have two errors totaling at most 2d2 2−p<3d 2−p. The triangle inequality gives ∥Bd(b)−Td∥F≤∥Pd,b,p−Qd,p∥F+3d2−p.

1.2A1F1F4givenchoosealgebra

The product of open operator-norm ε/128-balls around T5,T8 is a neighborhood in SU(5)×SU(8). By [A1] and [F1], it meets the normalized B6 image, so there is one finite braid word b∗ with both block operator errors less than ε/128. For dimension d≤8, the real-coordinate ℓ1 norm of a complex matrix is at most 2d∥A∥F≤2d3/2∥A∥op≤32∥A∥op by [F4]. Hence the exact coordinate-sum distance in either block is strictly less than ε/4.

2.1F4step 1.1givenalgebra

The rational sum sd,b,p of absolute real and imaginary coordinates dominates ∥Pd,b,p−Qd,p∥F. Hence [F4] gives ∥Bd(b)−Td∥op≤sd,b,p+3d2−p<sd,b,p+4d2−p. If the corresponding rational test passes, this is strictly below ε. Both passing tests therefore certify the two strict block-error bounds without any choice assumption.

3.1F2F3A1step 2.1step 1.2algebraF1∎

Fix this finite word. Its exact block matrices and the targets have coordinate approximants converging to their entries by [F2]–[F3]. Therefore sd,b∗,p converges to the real-coordinate ℓ1 distance between the exact word block and target; by step 1.2 that limit is less than ε/4. Since 4d2−p→0, some finite p makes both certificates strictly below ε. Dovetailing eventually examines (b∗,p), and the return rule [F3] triggers acceptance. Step 2.1 supplies both strict block-error bounds for the returned word. Thus the procedure halts. ACω enters only through [A1] and [F1]; density gives no search-index bound.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources