How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
One B6 braid approximates an encoded two-qubit gate
Statement
Assume and use the six-anyon triple-triple encoding Six-anyon triple-encoded subspace and leakage complement. For any put For every , one normalized six-strand braid word has both block errors and . In either total-charge block, the normalized braid's logical block error and leakage amplitude relative to the encoded action of are at most . The physical categorical braid is with ; its logical block error is at most relative to the phase-matched target , and its leakage amplitude is unchanged. This common scalar is recorded under Braid phase reference and correction ledger and must be handled under coherent control. When the two determinant-corrected targets are supplied as certified Cauchy inputs, the dovetailed B6 compiler finds such a word. No useful joint-block word-length or search-time bound is asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The six-anyon code embeddings, a unitary on , , and .
The code has dimension four in both fixed-charge blocks, with ambient dimensions five and eight and the stated leakage complements. Six-anyon triple-encoded subspace and leakage complement
The normalized joint B6 closure contains under ACω. Joint SU(5)×SU(8) closure from B6 path blocks
If an ambient unitary is within of a code-preserving block target, logical block error and leakage are each at most . Block-target approximation bounds logical error and leakage
The physical braid word differs from normalized blocks by the common scalar on every charge block. The braid phase is a common scalar character
For certified Cauchy target inputs the shared-word search terminates. Certified B6 block-pair search terminates
Assume exactly . The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
Proof
Since is unitary, . Each displayed extension is unitary on the orthogonal direct sum. Its determinant is , so and . Both preserve the encoded four-dimensional subspace and act there as , by [F1].
The product of open operator-norm -balls around is a neighborhood in . By [A1] and [F2], it contains the image of one common normalized braid word. This proves both block inequalities at once; the word is not chosen separately for the two sectors. For certified Cauchy targets, [F5] gives a terminating search with rational strict certificates (choose any rational tolerance below ).
Apply [F3] in each charge block to the normalized braid matrix and its code-preserving extension . The normalized compression to the code differs from by at most , and the off-diagonal block from code to leakage has norm at most . Write for the common unit scalar from [F4]. The physical compression differs from the phase-matched target by ; its leakage amplitude is . The exponent-sum phase must still be retained under coherent control.
Depends on
- Exhaustive certified Fibonacci B6 block-pair search
- Certified B6 block-pair search terminates
- Six-anyon triple-encoded subspace and leakage complement
- Block-target approximation bounds logical error and leakage
- The braid phase is a common scalar character
- Braid phase reference and correction ledger
- Joint SU(5)×SU(8) closure from B6 path blocks
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
42 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Chetan Nayak, Steven H. Simon, Ady Stern, Michael Freedman, and Sankar Das Sarma, Non-Abelian Anyons and Topological Quantum Computation (standard reference, not scraped)
- Michael H. Freedman, Michael J. Larsen, and Zhenghan Wang, A Modular Functor Which Is Universal for Quantum Computation (standard reference, not scraped)