How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Six-anyon triple-encoded subspace and leakage complement
Definition
Assume the Fibonacci fusion rules and , with each listed summand of multiplicity one. For six ordered charges, let be the fixed-input, fixed-total fusion space of total charge in the tree that first fuses leaves and separately, then fuses those triple outputs. Let be the same fixed-charge space in the left-associated tree.
To identify these spaces, write . Use the object associator composite from the triple-grouped input tree to the left-associated tree. On a fusion morphism into , define ; this is a unitary change of fusion-tree coordinates.
For one triple of total charge , its two orthonormal path vectors are indexed by the charge after the first two anyons: both channels have multiplicity one. Write these vectors as . For and , let be the grouped-tree vector with first triple path , first triple total , second triple path , second triple total , and final vertex channel . The last channel has multiplicity one. Define In the ordered basis , the inclusion is an isometry; its code projector is . The same ordered local triple paths are used for and ; only the final pair-charge coordinate differs. The orthogonal complements are called leakage spaces.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The stated Fibonacci fusion rules, the multiplicity-aware fusion-tree basis, the unitary associator, and the fixed-charge encoding convention.
Assume the Fibonacci fusion rules stated in the Definition. The actual Fibonacci data carrier states and with multiplicity one in each channel. Fibonacci fusion data and chiral convention
The fusion-tree definition constructs each path vector by composing its vertex multiplicity-basis maps. Multiplicity-aware fusion-tree basis
The fusion-tree lemma proves that these path vectors form a complete orthonormal basis and counts them by the products of the vertex multiplicities. Fusion-tree basis and dimension recursion
An isometric inclusion has code projector onto its image. Fixed-charge encoding and code projector
Each associator is unitary, so the stated finite associator composite induces a unitary map between the two fusion-tree Hom spaces. Unitary fusion category F-symbol unitarity
Proof
The fusion rule gives and therefore , . Applying the fusion-tree count [F2] to the grouped tree, total charge receives one basis vector from the triple-output pair and four from , so . Total charge receives two vectors from , two from , and four from , so . The map in [F4] is unitary, hence and .
Each selected triple-total- factor has its two paths and , and the final vertex has multiplicity one. Thus the four grouped-tree vectors are admissible tree vectors by [F1] and form an orthonormal family by [F2]. Applying the unitary preserves orthonormality, so they define an isometric inclusion ; [F3] gives the projector and .
The orthogonal decompositions then give and by step 1.1. These code copies share the same ordered local triple paths, while their final output charge differs. This supplies the dimensions and path identification used in the two B6 blocks.
Depends on
Used by
- B6 exact rank certificates and encoded leakage budget Example
- Exact eight-dimensional Fibonacci B6 density Theorem
- Exact five-dimensional Fibonacci B6 density Theorem
- Fibonacci B6 approximates one logical two-qubit gate in both charge blocks Theorem
- One B6 braid approximates an encoded two-qubit gate Theorem
- Six-anyon braid target extends uniformly to fusion spectators Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Chetan Nayak, Steven H. Simon, Ady Stern, Michael Freedman, and Sankar Das Sarma, Non-Abelian Anyons and Topological Quantum Computation (standard reference, not scraped)
- Michael H. Freedman, Michael J. Larsen, and Zhenghan Wang, A Modular Functor Which Is Universal for Quantum Computation (standard reference, not scraped)