Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Inward reaction fields preserve rectangles and stoichiometric mass

Statement

Let R=∏i=1m[ai,bi] be the reaction-inward rectangle of Inward reaction rectangles. Assume F from Reaction vector fields and quasi-positivity is continuously differentiable on an open neighborhood of R, and its derivative is bounded on some closed neighborhood of R. For any z0∈R, the IVP z′=F(z) has a unique solution for every t≥0, and z(t)∈R. If c is a conservation vector on R, then cTz(t)=cTz0; if it is a dissipation vector, then cTz(t) is nonincreasing. When every ai=0, quasi-positivity implies the lower-face condition on R; upper-face inwardness remains a separate hypothesis.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A compact rectangle R, a C1 reaction field on a neighborhood with bounded derivative there, inward signs on every lower and upper face, and a stoichiometric vector c on R.

[F1]

Inward reaction rectangles: the rectangle is reaction-inward exactly when the lower-face signs are Fi≥0 and upper-face signs are Fi≤0.

[F2]

Stoichiometric conservation and dissipation functionals: cTF=0 on R for conservation, or cTF≤0 on R for dissipation.

[F3]

Picard-Lindelöf local existence and uniqueness for first-order systems: a continuous field locally Lipschitz in the state variable has a unique local solution through each point of its open domain.

[F4]

Every Picard–Lindelöf initial value problem has one maximal solution on an open interval: a Picard–Lindelöf IVP has a unique maximal solution, and any other solution through the same data is its restriction.

[F5]

Gronwall's integral inequality with variable and constant coefficients: if a continuous nonnegative V satisfies V(t)≤C∫0tV(s) ds, then V(t)=0.

[A1]

Because R is compact and U is open, and DF is bounded on some closed neighborhood of R, choose δ>0 small enough that the closed convex neighborhood Rδ=R+B‾δ is contained both in U and in that bounded neighborhood. Then DF is bounded on Rδ, so F is Lipschitz there with a constant L, and compactness gives MF=sup⁡Rδ∥F∥<∞.

Proof

1.1A1F1F3givenalgebra

Let z(t) be the unique local solution from [F3] and let p(t) be the coordinatewise projection of z(t) onto R. While z(t)∈Rδ, define V(t)=∑i((ai−zi(t))+2+(zi(t)−bi)+2), where x+=max⁡(x,0). The squared positive-part function is continuously differentiable. If zi<ai, then pi=ai and [F1], [A1] give Fi(z)≥Fi(p)−L∥z−p∥≥−L∥z−p∥; if zi>bi, then pi=bi and Fi(z)≤Fi(p)+L∥z−p∥≤L∥z−p∥. Differentiating the active terms of V therefore yields V′(t)≤CmLV(t) for a finite constant Cm depending only on m.

2.1step 1.1F5given

Since V(0)=0, integrating V′(t)≤CmLV(t) gives 0≤V(t)≤CmL∫0tV(s) ds on any initial interval where z remains in Rδ. Apply Gronwall's inequality [F5] to obtain V(t)=0. Thus z(t) cannot leave R on its local interval of existence.

3.1A1F3F4F6step 2.1algebra

The field is bounded by MF on R by [A1]. If a maximal solution interval had a finite right endpoint T∗, then ∥z(t)−z(s)∥≤MF∣t−s∣ for s,t<T∗, so z(t) has a limit z∗∈R as t↑T∗. The open domain contains z∗, so [F3] gives a solution starting at (T∗,z∗); local uniqueness in [F3] joins it to the original solution, contradicting maximality [F4]. Hence the solution exists for every t≥0, and step 2.1 keeps it in R.

4.1F2F6givenalgebra∎

Along the solution, ddt(cTz(t))=cTF(z(t)). By [F2] this derivative is zero in the conservation case and nonpositive in the dissipation case. Integrating over [0,t] proves the corresponding mass conclusion.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources