Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 11 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 11 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Reaction-diffusion systems, invariants and pattern computation

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

This page defines locally Lipschitz reaction fields, inward invariant rectangles, stoichiometric conservation and dissipation, continuous semilinear systems, and the periodic centered and no-flux TPFA diffusion operators used here. It proves continuous mass balance on boxes and, under its explicit ACω branch, bounded piecewise C1 domains; reaction and diffusion invariance, exact and bounded Euler reaction-then-diffusion split invariants, two-species continuous and discrete Turing mode tests, and mesh-uniform first-order Lie error bounds for smooth solutions on periodic grids and on rectangular no-flux TPFA grids with even C4 boundary compatibility.

The finite-volume result is limited to two-point flux diffusion on the supplied admissible mesh with homogeneous no-flux boundaries. The convergence estimates are proved only for the stated periodic and rectangular Cartesian grids under their smoothness assumptions. Cross-diffusion needs a separate entropy or coercivity argument; componentwise maximum principles do not establish it. Consistent-mass P1 diffusion can fail nodal positivity, as the companion counterexample shows. A continuous unstable Turing band need not contain a discrete grid eigenvalue.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Reaction vector fields and quasi-positivity

Definition

Let m≥1, let U⊆Rm be open, and let F:U→Rm be locally Lipschitz. Write Fi for its ith component. The autonomous reaction equation is z′(t)=F(z(t)). The field is quasi-positive on U∩[0,∞)m if, for every i and every z∈U∩[0,∞)m with zi=0, one has Fi(z)≥0. This condition concerns only the coordinate faces of the nonnegative orthant.

For a rectangle R=∏i=1m[ai,bi]⊂U with ai<bi, the field is inward-pointing on R if Fi(z)≥0 whenever z∈R and zi=ai, and Fi(z)≤0 whenever z∈R and zi=bi. If ai=0 for every i, quasi-positivity supplies the lower-face half of this condition, but the upper-face inequalities remain separate hypotheses. Neither boundary condition by itself asserts that a numerical update preserves R.

For smoothness-dependent results below, F∈C4(U,Rm) will be stated explicitly. No smoothness beyond local Lipschitz continuity is built into this definition.

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Periodic rectangular reaction-diffusion grid

Definition

Fix d≥1, side lengths Lj>0, and integers Nj≥3. Put hj=Lj/Nj, TLd=∏j=1d(R/LjZ), and Gh=∏j=1d(Z/NjZ). Grid nodes are xi=((ij+12)hj)j=1d modulo the side lengths, grid indices wrap modulo Nj, and Phu=(u(xi))i∈Gh denotes sampling. The cell volume is mh=∏jhj. The positive periodic heat stencil is the unit-diffusivity specialization of the periodic operator in Fully discrete θ heat finite-difference scheme:

(Ahperv)i=∑j=1d2vi−vi+ej−vi−ejhj2.

For s species with diffusivities dr≥0, the reaction-diffusion grid generator acts on species r by −drAhper. Each grid node has weight mh=∏jhj; the stencil has zero row and column sums, so each species' weighted sum is conserved by diffusion. Its matrix representation satisfies Lh=mhAhper, with symmetric Lh, nonpositive off-diagonal entries and Lh1=0.

The sign convention is that Ahper is nonnegative and −drAhper generates diffusion. The exact eigenvalues of the positive stencil are supplied by Periodic heat-stencil eigenvalues and θ amplification factor. This grid is the only spatial discretization used in the periodic error theorem; no mesh-uniform claim for general finite-volume meshes is made there.

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableOpen item page →

Inward reaction rectangles

Definition

Let F:U→Rm be locally Lipschitz, and let R=∏i=1m[ai,bi]⊂U with finite ai<bi. The rectangle is reaction-inward if, for every i, Fi(z)≥0 on the lower face zi=ai and Fi(z)≤0 on the upper face zi=bi, with all other coordinates in their intervals. It is reaction-invariant if the solution map ΦFt is defined for all t≥0 on R and ΦFt(R)⊆R for every t≥0.

For a rectangle with ai=0 for all i, quasi-positivity from Reaction vector fields and quasi-positivity implies the lower-face condition. That condition tests only points in R and does not imply quasi-positivity on all of U∩[0,∞)m. The upper-face condition is independent and must be checked separately. The inward-sign condition is a hypothesis, not by definition an invariance theorem.

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableOpen item page →

Stoichiometric conservation and dissipation functionals

Definition

Let F:U→Rm be the reaction vector field of Reaction vector fields and quasi-positivity, and let R⊂U be a state set. A vector c∈[0,∞)m is a stoichiometric conservation vector on R if cTF(z)=0 for every z∈R. It is a stoichiometric dissipation vector on R if cTF(z)≤0 for every z∈R. The corresponding pointwise mass is cTz.

For a Lebesgue measurable domain Ω⊆Rd and a measurable field u:Ω→Rm such that ∫Ω∣cTu(x)∣ dx<∞, the continuous total mass is Mc(u)=∫ΩcTu(x) dx, with Lebesgue integration. In particular, this is defined for bounded measurable fields on finite-volume domains. For any finite index set I with assigned positive weights mi, the discrete total mass of states Ui∈Rm is Mc,h(U)=∑i∈ImicTUi. The weights and index set are part of the discrete model. Conservation and dissipation always refer to these stated functionals and the stated state set; no claim is made for a different weight vector or for reactions outside R.

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableOpen item page →

Semilinear vector reaction-diffusion systems

Definition

Let m≥1, let D=diag⁡(d1,…,dm) with di≥0, and let F:U→Rm be as in Reaction vector fields and quasi-positivity. A semilinear vector reaction-diffusion system is

ut=DΔu+F(u),u(x,0)=u0(x),

on either a flat periodic torus TLd or a bounded connected polyhedral domain Ω⊂Rd with homogeneous no-flux conditions di∂nui=0 on each boundary face. Equivalently, ∂nui=0 is required for components with di>0; components with di=0 require no boundary condition. The diffusion matrix is diagonal and independent of u; this definition does not include cross-diffusion.

A classical solution is bounded in the rectangle R on [0,T] if u(x,t)∈R at every point and time in its stated solution class, with R as in Inward reaction rectangles. This item fixes the continuous PDE convention; the finite-volume and periodic discrete operators are defined separately.

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

No-flux TPFA diffusion generator

Definition

Let T=(K,F) be a finite TPFA-admissible cell-face mesh from Finite-volume cell-face meshes and geometric regularity and Orthogonal TPFA diffusion with harmonic face transmissibility. Impose homogeneous no-flux boundary conditions: boundary faces contribute zero flux and therefore no conductance. For adjacent cells K,L, set

cKL=∑F=K∣LTF,

where the sum is over their common interior faces and is zero when they are not adjacent. Set cKL=cLK and mK=∣K∣. If more than one face separates a cell pair, summing their conductances gives the same cell-balance flux as retaining the faces separately. Define the symmetric matrix Lh by (Lh)KK=∑L≠KcKL and (Lh)KL=−cKL for K≠L.

For species diffusivities dr≥0, the no-flux finite-volume diffusion equation is MUr′+drLhUr=0 for each species r, where M=diag⁡(∣K∣). Its component equation is

∣K∣(UK,r)′=dr∑L:cKL>0cKL(UL,r−UK,r).

The equality is the usual shared-face TPFA balance with outward flux TF(UK,r−UL,r) and no boundary flux. The matrix Lh is symmetric, has zero row sums and nonpositive off-diagonal entries, and obeys vTLhv=∑{K,L}cKL(vK−vL)2≥0, where the sum is over unordered adjacent cell pairs. With M=diag⁡(∣K∣), the generator −M−1Lh is self-adjoint in the weighted pairing ⟨v,w⟩M=vTMw. This definition makes no accuracy claim for arbitrary admissible meshes.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Inward reaction fields preserve rectangles and stoichiometric mass

Statement

Let R=∏i=1m[ai,bi] be the reaction-inward rectangle of Inward reaction rectangles. Assume F from Reaction vector fields and quasi-positivity is continuously differentiable on an open neighborhood of R, and its derivative is bounded on some closed neighborhood of R. For any z0∈R, the IVP z′=F(z) has a unique solution for every t≥0, and z(t)∈R. If c is a conservation vector on R, then cTz(t)=cTz0; if it is a dissipation vector, then cTz(t) is nonincreasing. When every ai=0, quasi-positivity implies the lower-face condition on R; upper-face inwardness remains a separate hypothesis.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A compact rectangle R, a C1 reaction field on a neighborhood with bounded derivative there, inward signs on every lower and upper face, and a stoichiometric vector c on R.

[F1]

Inward reaction rectangles: the rectangle is reaction-inward exactly when the lower-face signs are Fi≥0 and upper-face signs are Fi≤0.

[F2]

Stoichiometric conservation and dissipation functionals: cTF=0 on R for conservation, or cTF≤0 on R for dissipation.

[F3]

Picard-Lindelöf local existence and uniqueness for first-order systems: a continuous field locally Lipschitz in the state variable has a unique local solution through each point of its open domain.

[F4]

Every Picard–Lindelöf initial value problem has one maximal solution on an open interval: a Picard–Lindelöf IVP has a unique maximal solution, and any other solution through the same data is its restriction.

[F5]

Gronwall's integral inequality with variable and constant coefficients: if a continuous nonnegative V satisfies V(t)≤C∫0tV(s) ds, then V(t)=0.

[A1]

Because R is compact and U is open, and DF is bounded on some closed neighborhood of R, choose δ>0 small enough that the closed convex neighborhood Rδ=R+B‾δ is contained both in U and in that bounded neighborhood. Then DF is bounded on Rδ, so F is Lipschitz there with a constant L, and compactness gives MF=sup⁡Rδ∥F∥<∞.

Proof

1.1A1F1F3givenalgebra

Let z(t) be the unique local solution from [F3] and let p(t) be the coordinatewise projection of z(t) onto R. While z(t)∈Rδ, define V(t)=∑i((ai−zi(t))+2+(zi(t)−bi)+2), where x+=max⁡(x,0). The squared positive-part function is continuously differentiable. If zi<ai, then pi=ai and [F1], [A1] give Fi(z)≥Fi(p)−L∥z−p∥≥−L∥z−p∥; if zi>bi, then pi=bi and Fi(z)≤Fi(p)+L∥z−p∥≤L∥z−p∥. Differentiating the active terms of V therefore yields V′(t)≤CmLV(t) for a finite constant Cm depending only on m.

2.1step 1.1F5given

Since V(0)=0, integrating V′(t)≤CmLV(t) gives 0≤V(t)≤CmL∫0tV(s) ds on any initial interval where z remains in Rδ. Apply Gronwall's inequality [F5] to obtain V(t)=0. Thus z(t) cannot leave R on its local interval of existence.

3.1A1F3F4F6step 2.1algebra

The field is bounded by MF on R by [A1]. If a maximal solution interval had a finite right endpoint T∗, then ∥z(t)−z(s)∥≤MF∣t−s∣ for s,t<T∗, so z(t) has a limit z∗∈R as t↑T∗. The open domain contains z∗, so [F3] gives a solution starting at (T∗,z∗); local uniqueness in [F3] joins it to the original solution, contradicting maximality [F4]. Hence the solution exists for every t≥0, and step 2.1 keeps it in R.

4.1F2F6givenalgebra∎

Along the solution, ddt(cTz(t))=cTF(z(t)). By [F2] this derivative is zero in the conservation case and nonpositive in the dissipation case. Integrating over [0,t] proves the corresponding mass conclusion.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

A bounded forward-Euler reaction step preserves an inward rectangle

Statement

Let R=∏i=1m[ai,bi] be reaction-inward for F from Reaction vector fields and quasi-positivity. Assume for each i there is a coordinate Lipschitz constant Li≥0 such that ∣Fi(z)−Fi(w)∣≤Li∣zi−wi∣ whenever z,w∈R differ only in coordinate i. Define

τR=min⁡i:Li>0Li−1,

with τR=+∞ if every Li=0. For z∈R and 0≤τ≤τR, the forward-Euler reaction step z+=z+τF(z) lies in R. For every conservation vector c on R, cTz+=cTz; for every dissipation vector, cTz+≤cTz.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An inward rectangle R, coordinate Lipschitz constants Li, a state z∈R, a step 0≤τ≤τR, and a stoichiometric vector c.

[F1]

Inward reaction rectangles: Fi≥0 on the lower face and Fi≤0 on the upper face of R.

[F2]

Stoichiometric conservation and dissipation functionals: cTF(z)=0 or cTF(z)≤0 throughout R.

[A1]

The coordinate Lipschitz inequalities with constants Li in the Statement hold on R.

Proof

1.1A1F1givenconstruct

Fix coordinate i and keep the other coordinates of z fixed. Let z− replace zi by ai. By [F1], Fi(z−)≥0; hence [A1] gives Fi(z)≥−Li(zi−ai). Similarly, let z+ replace zi by bi. Then [F1] and [A1] give Fi(z)≤Li(bi−zi).

2.1A1F1step 1.1algebra

If Li>0, the lower estimate yields zi+τFi(z)−ai≥(1−τLi)(zi−ai)≥0, and the upper estimate yields bi−zi−τFi(z)≥(1−τLi)(bi−zi)≥0. If Li=0, [A1] makes Fi independent of zi on the coordinate interval; its lower and upper face signs force Fi(z)=0. Thus every coordinate of z+ lies in its interval.

3.1F2givenalgebra∎

The Euler formula gives cTz+=cTz+τcTF(z). Apply [F2] to get equality for a conservation vector and the claimed inequality for a dissipation vector.

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Cell-centered rectangular TPFA grid with homogeneous no-flux boundaries

Definition

Let Ω=∏j=1d(0,Lj), where Lj>0, and let integers Nj≥2 define hj=Lj/Nj. The finite cell set is Ih=∏j=1d{0,…,Nj−1}, cell centers are xi=((ij+12)hj)j=1d, and every cell has volume mh=∏jhj. This is the uniform orthogonal Cartesian mesh; adjacent center segments are perpendicular to their shared faces. Take the scalar cellwise coefficient to be λK=1 and give boundary faces homogeneous no-flux data, so they contribute no flux.

For a grid vector v=(vi)i∈Ih, define the positive cell-centered stencil

(AhNv)i=∑j=1d2vi−vi+ej−vi−ejhj2,

where an unavailable neighbor at a boundary is assigned the value of the boundary cell itself. Indeed a face normal to direction j has area ∣F∣=mh/hj and adjacent centers are distance hj apart, so its TPFA transmissibility is ∣F∣/hj=mh/hj2; dividing the cell balance by mh gives the displayed coefficient. Boundary faces contribute zero flux. Thus Mh=mhI and LhN=mhAhN are the mass and stiffness matrices of the no-flux specialization in No-flux TPFA diffusion generator. For species diffusivities dr≥0, the finite-volume diffusion equation is Ur′=−drAhNUr.

Define the doubled periodic grid with 2Nj cells per direction on side lengths 2Lj, using the same widths hj, as in Periodic rectangular reaction-diffusion grid. The reflection map Eh extends U evenly across every boundary face: in one coordinate, its extended index is i for 0≤i<Nj and 2Nj−1−i for Nj≤i<2Nj; apply this coordinatewise. This finite reflection convention is used in the error theorem below.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Continuous reaction-diffusion mass balance on boxes, tori, and piecewise C1 domains

Statement

Let u∈C1([0,T];C2(Ω‾;Rm)) solve ut=DΔu+F(u), with constant diagonal D=diag⁡(di), and let its range lie in R. Let c be a conservation or dissipation vector on R. One may take (i) a box Ω=∏j=1d[0,Lj] with periodic identification or homogeneous Neumann data, or (ii) a bounded domain Ω⊂Rd, d≥2, with a specified finite piecewise C1 boundary presentation as in Specified finite piecewise C1 boundary presentations, assuming ACω in this second branch and homogeneous Neumann data on every face outside the edge set. For either branch,

ddt∫ΩcTu(x,t) dx=∫ΩcTF(u(x,t)) dx.

Hence the total mass is constant when cTF=0 on R and nonincreasing when cTF≤0 on R. The first branch is choice-free; ACω is used only for the stated piecewise C1 divergence-theorem branch.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth bounded solution of the diagonal semilinear system, its state rectangle, a conservation or dissipation vector, and one of the two domain and boundary-condition branches in the Statement.

[F1]

Semilinear vector reaction-diffusion systems: ut=DΔu+F(u) with constant diagonal D and periodic or homogeneous no-flux conditions.

[F2]

Stoichiometric conservation and dissipation functionals: cTF(z)=0 throughout R in the conservation case, and cTF(z)≤0 throughout R in the dissipation case.

[F3]

Riemann--Fubini on product rectangles, with lower and upper section integrals and content-zero exceptional sections: a continuous function on a compact product rectangle has equal iterated integrals in every coordinate order.

[F5]

Divergence for finite piecewise C1 presentations: under ACω, a specified finite piecewise C1 presentation and a C1 vector field give the bulk-divergence integral as the sum of outward face-flux integrals.

[F6]

Specified finite piecewise C1 boundary presentations: the bounded-domain branch has finitely many faces, an edge set null for each face, and the stated outward normal off that set.

[F7]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): ACω is the explicitly stated countable-choice axiom.

[A1]

In the box branch, opposite periodic traces match, or the outward normal derivative is zero on each face. In the piecewise C1 branch, assume ACω and ∂nui=0 on each face outside its edge set.

Proof

1.1F4givenalgebra

Since ut is continuous on the compact cylinder, the time difference quotient of cTu is the time average of cTut by [F4], and uniform continuity makes it converge uniformly to cTut. Each stated domain has finite volume, so integrating this uniform convergence proves ddt∫ΩcTu=∫ΩcTut.

2.1A1F1F3F4step 1.1algebra

In the box branch, substitute [F1] into step 1.1. The diffusion contribution is ∑icidi∫ΩΔui dx. For each coordinate j, [F3] permits integration in xj first, and [F4] gives ∫0Lj∂jjui dxj=∂jui∣xj=Lj−∂jui∣xj=0. This difference is zero for matching periodic traces and is zero for homogeneous Neumann data. Summing over components and coordinates makes the total diffusion contribution vanish.

2.2A1F5F6F7step 1.1algebra

In the specified piecewise C1 branch, each vector field ∇ui is C1 on the closure. Apply [F5] using the domain presentation [F6] and the axiom assumption [F7]: ∫ΩΔui dx=∑j∫Sj∇ui⋅νj dS. By [A1], the integrand is zero on every face outside its surface-null edge set; hence every face integral vanishes. Thus the diffusion contribution to step 1.1 is also zero in this branch.

3.1F2step 2.1step 2.2algebra∎

In either branch, after the diffusion term vanishes, the remaining derivative is ∫ΩcTF(u(x,t)) dx. By [F2] its integrand is identically zero in the conservation case and nonpositive in the dissipation case. Integrating proves the claimed mass derivative and monotonicity.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Second-order spatial consistency of the periodic FV heat stencil

Statement

Let ur∈C4(TLd), and let Phur denote its samples on the periodic rectangular grid of Periodic rectangular reaction-diffusion grid. For every grid node i,

∣(AhperPhur)i+Ph(Δur)i∣≤112∑j=1dhj2∥∂jjjjur∥L∞(TLd).

For D=diag⁡(d1,…,dm), define the sampled spatial residual rh=D(PhΔu−ΔhPhu), where Δh=−Ahper acts componentwise. If the indicated fourth derivatives are uniformly bounded for 0≤t≤T, then ∥rh(t)∥∞≤Csphmax⁡2 with Csp=dmax⁡12∑j∥∂jjjju∥L∞ componentwise, uniformly in the mesh.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth periodic scalar or vector field on TLd, the periodic rectangular grid, and its positive stencil Ahper.

[F1]

Periodic rectangular reaction-diffusion grid: (Ahperv)i=∑j(2vi−vi+ej−vi−ej)/hj2 with periodic wraparound.

[F2]

The Lagrange and Cauchy forms of Taylor's remainder: for a four-times continuously differentiable scalar function, the third-degree Taylor remainder at x±h has magnitude at most ∥f(4)∥∞h4/24.

[A1]

Each component ur is periodic and belongs to C4; the derivative norms in the Statement are finite.

Proof

1.1A1F2algebra

Fix a node i and direction j. Lift the periodic component to its smooth periodic function on Rd. Apply [F2] to the one-variable restrictions at xi+hjej and xi−hjej, expanding each through its cubic term at xi. The odd first- and third-degree terms cancel in the sum, leaving ur(xi+hjej)−2ur(xi)+ur(xi−hjej)=hj2∂jjur(xi)+ρij with ∣ρij∣≤hj4∥∂jjjjur∥∞/12.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

Divide the identity of step 1.1 by hj2, change sign to match the positive stencil, and sum over the finite directions j=1,…,d. The triangle inequality gives the first displayed bound. Multiplying componentwise by dr gives the residual estimate, and hj≤hmax⁡ gives the uniform constant stated above.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Mesh-uniform reaction-diffusion commutator bound on a periodic grid

Statement

Let u:[0,T]×TLd→R have bounded spatial derivatives through order two, with R a compact rectangle. Let F∈C2 on a neighborhood of R, and let Ah=−DAhper be the periodic-grid diffusion generator from Periodic rectangular reaction-diffusion grid. Define Fh(Phu)=Ph(F(u)) pointwise. Then, uniformly over all periodic grids with hj=Lj/Nj and Nj≥3, sup⁡Nj≥3 (1≤j≤d), 0≤t≤T∥AhFh(Phu(t))−DF(Phu(t))AhPhu(t)∥∞≤Ccom<∞, where Ccom depends only on the dimension, D, the suprema of D2u, DF, D2F, and the compact state rectangle, not on the mesh widths. This is the finite-grid commutator used in the first-order split-error proof; it is not a claim for arbitrary meshes or unbounded operators.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The periodic uniform grid, a diagonal nonnegative diffusion matrix, u with bounded spatial derivatives through order two, and F∈C2 on a neighborhood of the compact range of u.

[F1]

Periodic rectangular reaction-diffusion grid: Ah=−DAhper and each coordinate of Ahper is a centered second difference divided by hj2.

[F2]

Reaction vector fields and quasi-positivity: F is defined on an open neighborhood of R; the additional C2 assumption is in the Statement.

[F3]

The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a): if G is differentiable on a compact interval, including its one-sided endpoint derivatives, and G′ is Darboux integrable there, then ∫abG′=G(b)−G(a).

[F4]

A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion: a continuous scalar function on a compact interval is bounded and Darboux integrable.

[F5]

The mean value theorem, as the case g(x)=x of Cauchy's: for f continuous on [a,b] with a<b and differentiable on (a,b) there is c∈(a,b) with f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a): if a scalar function is continuous on a closed interval and differentiable in its interior, its endpoint difference equals an interior derivative times the interval length.

[F6]

A function differentiable at c is continuous at c: a differentiable scalar function is continuous at each point of differentiability; in particular, an everywhere existing second derivative makes the first derivative continuous on each coordinate interval.

[A1]

The range of u lies in a compact rectangle R and the displayed derivatives are uniformly bounded on [0,T]×TLd.

Proof

1.1A1F3F4F5F6givenalgebra

Let w be a twice differentiable scalar function on a coordinate lift with bounded w′′. By [F6], w′ is continuous; hence s↦w′(x+s)−w′(x−s) is continuous and integrable on [0,h] by [F4]. Apply [F3] to the differentiable function s↦w(x+s)+w(x−s)−2w(x), whose endpoint derivatives are the corresponding one-sided restrictions. This gives w(x+h)−2w(x)+w(x−h)=∫0h(w′(x+s)−w′(x−s)) ds. For s>0, [F5] applied to w′ on [x−s,x+s] gives ∣w′(x+s)−w′(x−s)∣≤2s∥w′′∥∞; at s=0 this also holds. Integrating yields ∣w(x+h)−2w(x)+w(x−h)∣≤h2∥w′′∥∞. Thus the centered second difference divided by h2 has the same mesh-independent bound. Only the continuous first derivative was integrated; integrability or continuity of w′′ is not assumed.

2.1A1F2F3F4F5F6step 1.1algebra

Fix a component i and a spatial direction j. The chain rule first gives ∂j(Fi(u))=∑k∂kFi(u) ∂juk. Applying the product rule to each summand and the chain rule to ∂kFi(u) gives ∂jj(Fi(u))=∑k∂kFi(u) ∂jjuk+∑k,ℓ∂kℓFi(u)(∂juk)(∂juℓ). These are pointwise identities under the stated second-order spatial differentiability of u and F∈C2 near its range. To express the bound using only the quantities listed in the Statement, let wk=sup⁡Rzk−inf⁡Rzk and Hkj=∥∂jjuk∥∞. For g(s)=uk(x+sej,t) on the periodic lift, g′ is continuous by [F6], and r↦g′(r)−g′(0) is integrable on [0,s] by [F4]. Apply [F3] to r↦g(r)−g(0)−rg′(0) to get g(s)−g(0)−sg′(0)=∫0s(g′(r)−g′(0)) dr. By [F5] on g′, ∣g′(r)−g′(0)∣≤rHkj for 0≤r≤s. The remainder is therefore bounded by s2Hkj/2. Since ∣g(s)−g(0)∣≤wk, this yields, for every s>0, s∣∂juk(x,t)∣≤wk+s22Hkj. If wkHkj>0, choose s=2wk/Hkj to obtain ∣∂juk∣≤2wkHkj. If Hkj=0, the same inequality for every s gives ∂juk=0; if wk=0, the component is constant and the same conclusion holds. Therefore the displayed chain-rule terms are uniformly bounded in terms of R, D2u, DF, and D2F, as asserted.

3.1A1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

In each component, AhFh(Phu) is a finite sum of di times the centered second differences of Fi∘u, while DF(Phu)AhPhu is the finite sum of ∂kFi(u)dk times the centered second differences of uk. Step 1.1 bounds each difference uniformly, and step 2.1 bounds every coefficient. There are only dm2 terms and D is fixed, so their sum is bounded by a constant independent of all hj.

PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Two-species continuous and discrete dispersion criteria

Statement

Let F∈C1 and let y∗∈R2 be a homogeneous equilibrium, F(y∗)=0. Set J=DF(y∗)=(Jij), assume tr⁡J<0 and det⁡J>0, and let D=diag⁡(d1,d2) with d1,d2>0. For any spatial eigenfunction of −Δ with eigenvalue λ≥0, the linearized reaction-diffusion mode has matrix J−λD. For the continuous rectangular torus, λ=λk=∑j(2πkj/Lj)2 with k∈Zd. For the periodic grid of Periodic rectangular reaction-diffusion grid, the mode indexed by ℓ has λ=λh,ℓ=4∑jhj−2sin⁡2(πℓj/Nj), with 0≤ℓj<Nj.

Define

βT=d2J11+d1J22,q(λ)=det⁡(J−λD)=d1d2λ2−βTλ+det⁡J.

For either domain or grid and each actual mode, J−λD has a positive-real-part eigenvalue exactly when q(λ)<0; it is Hurwitz exactly when q(λ)>0, and has a zero eigenvalue when q(λ)=0. Thus the continuous or discrete linear instability criterion tests the actual corresponding spectrum. If all nonnegative λ are regarded as continuously available, then a diffusion-driven unstable band exists exactly when βT>0 and βT2>4d1d2det⁡J; its endpoints are

λ±=βT±βT2−4d1d2det⁡J2d1d2.

On a bounded torus or a finite grid, the band criterion alone is not enough: at least one actual Laplacian eigenvalue must lie strictly between λ− and λ+.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The smooth two-component reaction field, homogeneous equilibrium, kinetic Jacobian J, positive diagonal diffusivities, and either a continuous periodic rectangular domain or the finite periodic grid.

[F1]

Semilinear vector reaction-diffusion systems: the diffusion matrix is diagonal and the reaction term is local, so linearization at a homogeneous equilibrium gives wt=DΔw+Jw.

[F2]

Periodic rectangular reaction-diffusion grid: the positive centered heat stencil is Ahper and the diffusion generator is its negative times D.

[F3]

Periodic heat-stencil eigenvalues and θ amplification factor: on a periodic rectangular grid the Fourier modes form a basis and the positive heat stencil has eigenvalues 4∑jhj−2sin⁡2(πℓj/Nj) when the directional diffusivities are one.

Proof

1.1F1givenconstructalgebra

Write u=y∗+εw. Differentiability of F gives F(y∗+εw)=F(y∗)+εJw+o(ε)=εJw+o(ε), so the linearized equation is wt=DΔw+Jw. For a continuous torus mode w(t,x)=a(t)e2πi∑jkjxj/Lj, direct differentiation gives Δw=−λkw and hence a′=(J−λkD)a.

1.2givenalgebra

For every λ≥0, tr⁡(J−λD)=tr⁡J−λ(d1+d2)<0. Expanding the 2×2 determinant gives det⁡(J−λD)=(J11−λd1)(J22−λd2)−J12J21=d1d2λ2−βTλ+det⁡J=q(λ).

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

For the grid, insert a Fourier vector from [F3] into the linearized finite system. By [F2] its diffusion part multiplies that mode by −Dλh,ℓ; the reaction Jacobian acts on the species coordinate by J. Therefore the mode coefficient satisfies a′=(J−λh,ℓD)a. The basis assertion in [F3] ensures these are the actual grid mode matrices.

2.2step 1.2algebra

The characteristic polynomial of a real 2×2 matrix A is μ2−tr⁡(A)μ+det⁡(A). If tr⁡(A)<0 and det⁡(A)<0, its discriminant tr⁡(A)2−4det⁡(A) is positive and the real roots have negative product, so one is positive. If tr⁡(A)<0 and det⁡(A)>0, real roots have negative sum and positive product, so both are negative; nonreal roots are conjugate with real part tr⁡(A)/2<0. If the determinant is zero, one eigenvalue is zero and the other is the trace, which is negative. Applying these alternatives to A=J−λD proves the mode tests in the Statement.

3.1step 1.2step 2.2algebra∎

Since d1d2>0 and det⁡J>0, the upward-opening quadratic q is negative at some λ≥0 exactly when its minimum occurs at a positive point and its discriminant is strictly positive. Its minimizer is βT/(2d1d2), so the first condition is βT>0; its discriminant is βT2−4d1d2det⁡J, so the second condition is the strict inequality in the Statement. Under these conditions both roots are positive because their sum is βT/(d1d2)>0 and product is det⁡J/(d1d2)>0, and factorization gives q<0 precisely between them. The mode tests from step 2.2 then prove the continuous-spectrum and finite-grid criteria without replacing either actual spectrum by all real wavenumbers.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Finite-volume and periodic diffusion preserve intervals and weighted mass

Statement

Consider either the no-flux TPFA cell system of No-flux TPFA diffusion generator or the periodic grid system of Periodic rectangular reaction-diffusion grid. Write its finite index set as I, its positive diagonal mass matrix as M=diag⁡(mi), and its stiffness matrix as L. In both cases L=LT, L1=0, and Lij=−cij for i≠j, where cij=cji≥0. For each species r, let dr≥0 and solve Mur′+drLur=0. Assume ar≤br for every species. If initially ui,r∈[ar,br] for all i,r, then the solution exists for all t≥0 and remains in those intervals. More precisely, each species evolution matrix has nonnegative entries and row sums one, so it is a contraction in the maximum norm. The flow also preserves each weighted species sum ∑imiui,r and therefore every finite linear combination of species sums, including Mc,h of Stoichiometric conservation and dissipation functionals.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Either stated finite diffusion discretization, a finite index set I, positive masses, symmetric stiffness with nonpositive off-diagonal entries and zero row sums, species diffusivities dr≥0, and initial component values in the stated intervals.

[F1]

No-flux TPFA diffusion generator: its mass matrix has entries mK=∣K∣>0; its stiffness has symmetric off-diagonal entries −cKL≤0 and zero row sums.

[F2]

Periodic rectangular reaction-diffusion grid: its mass matrix is mhI and its stiffness mhAhper is symmetric, has nonpositive off-diagonal entries, and annihilates constants.

[F3]

Finite matrix exponential series and its identities: for a finite matrix A, etA is defined by a convergent power series, is differentiable with derivative AetA, and exponentials of commuting matrices multiply to the exponential of their sum.

[F5]

Stoichiometric conservation and dissipation functionals: Mc,h(U)=∑imicTUi.

[F6]

Picard-Lindelöf local existence and uniqueness for first-order systems: a locally Lipschitz finite-dimensional vector field has a unique local solution through each initial state.

Proof

1.1F1F2givenchooseconstructinduction

Fix a species r and put Ar=−drM−1L. If dr=0, the solution is constant. If dr>0, then (Ar)ij=drcij/mi≥0 for i≠j, every row sums to zero, and (Ar)ii=−dr∑j≠icij/mi. Choose α>0 at least as large as every exit rate dr∑j≠icij/mi, and set P=I+Ar/α. Then P is entrywise nonnegative with row sums one. Matrix multiplication shows inductively that every Pk has these same properties.

1.2F1F2F3algebra

Symmetry of L and L1=0 give 1TL=0. Hence 1TMAr=−dr1TL=0, and multiplication by every power of Ar gives 1TMArk=0 for k≥1. The exponential series therefore yields 1TMetAr=1TM, so the weighted sum of species r is conserved.

2.1F3F4F6step 1.1algebra

If dr=0, etAr=I has nonnegative entries and row sums one. Otherwise use the α and P of step 1.1. Since Ar=α(P−I), [F3] gives etAr=eαtPe−αtI. The power series shows e−αtI=e−αtI, whose scalar coefficient is positive by [F4]. Every term in the series for eαtP is entrywise nonnegative by step 1.1. Thus etAr is entrywise nonnegative. Since Ar1=0, its power series also gives etAr1=1. By [F3], this exponential has derivative AretAr and initial value I, so it solves the finite ODE; [F6] gives uniqueness.

3.1F3F5step 2.1step 1.2algebra∎

The initial inequalities are ur(0)−ar1≥0 and br1−ur(0)≥0. Applying the nonnegative matrix etAr and using etAr1=1 from step 2.1 proves ar1≤etArur(0)≤br1. The explicit exponential is defined for every finite t≥0; step 1.2 preserves its weighted sum. Taking the finite linear combination in [F5] proves the stated mass assertion.

AlgorithmAlgorithm: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableOpen item page →

Exact reaction-then-diffusion Lie step on FV or periodic grids

Definition

Input: Either the no-flux TPFA discretization of No-flux TPFA diffusion generator or the periodic-grid discretization of Periodic rectangular reaction-diffusion grid; a reaction field F; a reaction-inward rectangle R such that F is C1 on an open neighborhood of R and DF is bounded on some closed neighborhood of R; a state Un with each cell/node state in R; and a time step τ≥0.

Procedure:

  1. At every cell/node i, solve the exact reaction IVP z˙=F(z) from z(0)=Uin to time τ, and set Vi=ΦFτ(Uin).
  2. For each species r, apply the exact diffusion map e−τdrM−1Lh in the TPFA case or e−τdrAhper in the periodic-grid case to the vector (Vi,r)i; call the output U⋅,rn+1.
  3. Return Un+1.

This order is the reaction-then-diffusion Lie composition. The maps in both substeps are exact flows. The algorithm makes no claim about an approximate ODE or matrix-exponential solver; any such solver error requires a separate bound. Under the hypotheses of Inward reaction fields preserve rectangles and stoichiometric mass and Finite-volume and periodic diffusion preserve intervals and weighted mass, each substep is well-defined for all finite τ on R.

AlgorithmAlgorithm: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableOpen item page →

Forward-Euler reaction followed by exact FV or periodic diffusion

Definition

Input: Either the no-flux TPFA discretization of No-flux TPFA diffusion generator or the periodic-grid discretization of Periodic rectangular reaction-diffusion grid; a reaction field F; a reaction-inward rectangle R; coordinate constants Li≥0 such that ∣Fi(z)−Fi(w)∣≤Li∣zi−wi∣ whenever z,w∈R differ only in coordinate i, as required in A bounded forward-Euler reaction step preserves an inward rectangle; τR=min⁡i:Li>0Li−1, with τR=+∞ if every Li=0; a state Un with every cell/node state in R; and 0≤τ≤τR.

Procedure:

  1. At every cell/node, compute the forward-Euler reaction value Vi=Uin+τF(Uin).
  2. For each species r, apply the exact diffusion map e−τdrM−1Lh in the TPFA case or e−τdrAhper in the periodic-grid case to (Vi,r)i.
  3. Return the resulting state Un+1.

This is an approximate reaction substep followed by exact diffusion. The bound τ≤τR is part of the input contract and is needed for the stated rectangle guarantee; no diffusion CFL restriction is needed because the diffusion map is exact. The procedure makes no claim about finite-precision evaluation of either step.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Exact reaction-diffusion Lie steps preserve rectangles and mass balance

Statement

Choose either the no-flux TPFA system of No-flux TPFA diffusion generator or the periodic grid system of Periodic rectangular reaction-diffusion grid, and use the exact reaction-then-diffusion step of Exact reaction-then-diffusion Lie step on FV or periodic grids. Let R=∏r=1m[ar,br] be reaction-inward, and suppose F is C1 on a neighborhood of R with derivative bounded on a closed neighborhood. If every cell/node state of Un lies in R, then every cell/node state of Un+1 lies in R for every finite τ≥0. If cTF=0 throughout R, then Mc,h(Un+1)=Mc,h(Un); if cTF≤0 throughout R, then Mc,h(Un+1)≤Mc,h(Un). Here Mc,h(U)=∑imicTUi uses the cell/node weights of the chosen discretization.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: One of the two stated finite diffusion discretizations, a reaction-inward rectangle R, a C1 field with bounded derivative near R, a conservation or dissipation vector c, and an initial grid state in R.

[F1]

Exact reaction-then-diffusion Lie step on FV or periodic grids: the step applies the exact reaction flow at each cell/node and then the exact specieswise diffusion flow.

[F2]

Inward reaction fields preserve rectangles and stoichiometric mass: the reaction flow exists for every finite nonnegative time, maps R into itself, and preserves or dissipates cTz under the corresponding condition on cTF.

[F3]

Finite-volume and periodic diffusion preserve intervals and weighted mass: each specieswise diffusion flow maps its component interval into itself and preserves that species' weighted sum.

[F4]

Stoichiometric conservation and dissipation functionals: the weighted discrete functional is Mc,h(U)=∑imicTUi with positive cell/node weights mi.

Proof

1.1F1F2F4givenalgebra

After the reaction substep of [F1], [F2] gives Vi∈R at every cell/node. It also gives cTVi=cTUin in the conservation case or cTVi≤cTUin in the dissipation case. Multiplying by mi>0 and summing over the finite index set proves the corresponding mass relation for V.

2.1F1F3step 1.1algebra∎

Apply the diffusion substep of [F1] to V. By [F3], each species remains in its interval, so every resulting cell/node state remains in R. Also [F3] preserves each species' weighted sum; taking the finite linear combination with coefficients cr preserves Mc,h. Thus the mass relation from step 1.1 is unchanged by diffusion, proving both conclusions for Un+1.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

A bounded Euler-reaction Lie step preserves rectangles and mass balance

Statement

Choose either the no-flux TPFA system of No-flux TPFA diffusion generator or the periodic grid system of Periodic rectangular reaction-diffusion grid. Use Forward-Euler reaction followed by exact FV or periodic diffusion with a reaction-inward rectangle R, an initial state in R, and 0≤τ≤τR from A bounded forward-Euler reaction step preserves an inward rectangle. Then every component of the output state lies in R. The functional Mc,h is unchanged when cTF=0 throughout R, and is nonincreasing when cTF≤0 throughout R. The diffusion substep here is exact; no positivity assertion for a forward-Euler diffusion substep is made.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: One of the two finite diffusion discretizations, an inward rectangle, a reaction field satisfying the coordinate Lipschitz hypotheses of the Euler lemma, a state in R, and 0≤τ≤τR.

[F1]

Forward-Euler reaction followed by exact FV or periodic diffusion: the procedure applies the nodewise forward-Euler reaction map and then exact specieswise diffusion.

[F2]

A bounded forward-Euler reaction step preserves an inward rectangle: for 0≤τ≤τR, the Euler reaction map sends R into itself and conserves or dissipates cTz under the stated condition on cTF.

[F3]

Finite-volume and periodic diffusion preserve intervals and weighted mass: the exact diffusion map preserves each component interval and each species' weighted sum.

[F4]

Stoichiometric conservation and dissipation functionals: Mc,h(U)=∑imicTUi for the positive weights of the discretization.

Proof

1.1F1F2F4givenalgebra

The reaction substep in [F1] is the map in [F2]. Its output lies in R at every cell/node. Multiplying the nodewise conservation equality or dissipation inequality by each positive weight mi and summing shows that this substep preserves or decreases Mc,h as claimed.

2.1F1F3step 1.1algebra∎

Apply the exact diffusion substep in [F1]. By [F3] it keeps every species component in its interval and preserves every species' weighted sum. Hence it preserves R and leaves the mass relation from step 1.1 unchanged. These are the claimed properties of the complete split update.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Mesh-uniform first-order Lie error for a smooth periodic reaction-diffusion solution

Statement

Fix T>0, a rectangular torus TLd, and D=diag⁡(d1,…,dm) with dr≥0. Let F∈C2(U,Rm) on an open neighborhood U of a compact reaction-inward rectangle R, and let u∈C1([0,T];C4(TLd;Rm)) solve ut=DΔu+F(u) with u(x,t)∈R. For each periodic grid of Periodic rectangular reaction-diffusion grid, let Phu(t) be the samples, and start the exact Lie algorithm Exact reaction-then-diffusion Lie step on FV or periodic grids from U0=Phu(0), using the periodic branch and uniform steps τ=T/N. There is a constant CT, depending on u,F,D,R,T,L,d,m but not on the grid widths or N, such that

max⁡0≤n≤N∥Un−Phu(tn)∥∞≤CT(τ+hmax⁡2),tn=nτ.

The estimate is for exact reaction and diffusion subflows, a fixed smooth solution, and the periodic centered grid. It gives no error claim for a general finite-volume mesh, nonsmooth solutions, approximate subsolvers, or nonlinear cross-diffusion.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth periodic solution in the reaction-invariant rectangle, fixed diagonal nonnegative diffusivities, the periodic grids, exact reaction-then-diffusion steps, and a fixed final time T.

[F1]

Periodic rectangular reaction-diffusion grid: Ahper is the periodic centered positive stencil, Δh=−Ahper, and the diffusion generator is Ah=−DAhper.

[F2]

Semilinear vector reaction-diffusion systems: the continuous equation is ut=DΔu+F(u) with constant diagonal diffusion and pointwise reaction.

[F3]

Second-order spatial consistency of the periodic FV heat stencil: the sampled spatial residual rh=D(PhΔu−ΔhPhu) obeys ∥rh(t)∥∞≤Csphmax⁡2 uniformly in time and grid.

[F4]

Mesh-uniform reaction-diffusion commutator bound on a periodic grid: for the sampled smooth solution, ∥AhPh(F(u))−DF(Phu)AhPhu∥∞≤Ccom with a grid-independent constant.

[F5]

Finite-volume and periodic diffusion preserve intervals and weighted mass: the periodic diffusion evolution matrix has nonnegative entries and row sums one, hence contracts the maximum norm.

[F6]
[F7]

Gronwall's integral inequality with variable and constant coefficients: if w(t)≤A+B∫0tw(s) ds for nonnegative continuous w and constants A,B≥0, then w(t)≤AeBt; the case A=0 gives w=0.

[F8]

Exact reaction-then-diffusion Lie step on FV or periodic grids: the reaction flow is applied first at each node and the exact periodic diffusion exponential is applied second.

[F9]

Finite matrix exponential series and its identities: for finite A, E(t)=etA is differentiable, E′=AE=EA, and E(0)=I.

[F11]

Inward reaction fields preserve rectangles and stoichiometric mass: the exact reaction solution exists for every finite nonnegative time and remains in R.

[A1]

The stated Ct1Cx4 regularity, C2 reaction field, and compact range imply uniform bounds on ut, D2u, DF, D2F, and the second spatial derivatives of F(u) on [0,T]×TLd.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F5F9F10givenalgebra

Let Yh(t)=Phu(t) and Eh(s)=esAh. By [F1]–[F3], the sampled equation is Yh′=AhYh+Fh(Yh)+rh, where Fh applies F at each node and ∥rh(t)∥∞≤Csphmax⁡2. Differentiate Eh(τ−s)Yh(t+s) using [F9], then integrate from s=0 to s=τ using [F10]; this gives Yh(t+τ)=Eh(τ)Yh(t)+∫0τEh(τ−s)(Fh(Yh(t+s))+rh(t+s)) ds. By [F5], ∥Eh(s)∥∞→∞≤1.

1.2A1F5F7algebra

For any two grid states X,Z nodewise in R, the reaction flows satisfy ∥ΦFhτ(X)−ΦFhτ(Z)∥∞≤eLFτ∥X−Z∥∞, where LF=sup⁡R∥DF∥; this follows by subtracting their nodewise integral equations and applying [F7]. Composing with the diffusion contraction [F5] gives ∥Sh,τ(X)−Sh,τ(Z)∥∞≤eLFτ∥X−Z∥∞ for the exact Lie map Sh,τ.

2.1F8F10F11step 1.1algebra

Write Vh(s)=ΦFhs(Yh(t)) for the nodewise exact reaction flow. By [F8], [F11], and integration of its reaction ODE using [F10], the exact Lie step from Yh(t) equals Eh(τ)Yh(t)+∫0τEh(τ)Fh(Vh(s)) ds. Subtract the identity in step 1.1 and add and subtract Eh(τ)Fh(Yh(t+s)) inside the integrand. The defect is therefore the sum of ∫0τ[Eh(τ)−Eh(τ−s)]Fh(Yh(t+s)) ds,∫0τEh(τ)[Fh(Vh(s))−Fh(Yh(t+s))] ds,−∫0τEh(τ−s)rh(t+s) ds.

3.1A1F1F4F5F9F10step 2.1algebra

For a scalar C2 component g, two integrations of g′′ give g(x+h)−2g(x)+g(x−h)=∫0h(h−s)(g′′(x+s)+g′′(x−s)) ds, so the absolute centered second difference divided by h2 is at most ∥g′′∥∞. Applying this in each coordinate to u and using [A1] gives ∥AhYh(t)∥∞≤Cu independently of the mesh. By [F4], AhFh(Yh)−DF(Yh)AhYh is uniformly bounded; [A1] bounds DF, so ∥AhFh(Yh(t+s))∥∞≤CA for all s and grids. Since Eh′(r)=Eh(r)Ah by [F9] and Eh contracts by [F5], ∥[Eh(τ)−Eh(τ−s)]Fh(Yh(t+s))∥∞≤∫τ−sτ∥Eh(r)AhFh(Yh(t+s))∥∞ dr≤CAs. Thus the first integral in step 2.1 has norm at most CAτ2/2.

3.2A1F3F5F10F11step 2.1algebra

The reaction path Vh(s) stays in R by [F11], so its time derivative is uniformly bounded by sup⁡R∥F∥. Also ∥Yh(t+s)−Yh(t)∥∞≤ssup⁡∥ut∥∞. Hence, integrating both time derivatives by [F10], ∥Vh(s)−Yh(t+s)∥∞≤Cs. The mean-value bound for F on the convex rectangle R and contraction of Eh show that the second integral in step 2.1 has norm at most Cτ2/2. The residual term has norm at most Cspτhmax⁡2 by [F3] and [F5]. Consequently the one-step defect is at most C(τ2+τhmax⁡2) with C independent of grid and step.

4.1F6step 3.2step 1.2algebra∎

Set en=∥Un−Yh(tn)∥∞. By [F6] and the assumed PDE range, both inputs in step 1.2 lie in R. Applying that stability estimate and the defect bound of step 3.2 gives en+1≤eLFτen+Cτ(τ+hmax⁡2), with e0=0. Iterating, en≤Cτ(τ+hmax⁡2)∑k=0n−1eLFkτ≤CTeLFT(τ+hmax⁡2) for nτ≤T. This proves the stated estimate after enlarging CT.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

No-flux rectangular TPFA Lie error by even reflection

Statement

Let Ω=∏j=1d(0,Lj) and let u∈C1([0,T];C4(Ω‾;Rm)) solve ut=DΔu+F(u) with D=diag⁡(dr), dr≥0, and range in a compact reaction-inward rectangle R. Assume F∈C2 near R, homogeneous Neumann data hold, and the coordinatewise even reflection of u across every face extends to a Ct1Cx4 function on the doubled torus ∏j(R/2LjZ). On the uniform cell-centered grid of Cell-centered rectangular TPFA grid with homogeneous no-flux boundaries, start the exact reaction-then-diffusion Lie step of Exact reaction-then-diffusion Lie step on FV or periodic grids from cell-center samples and use uniform τ=T/N. Then a constant CT, independent of the mesh widths and N, satisfies

max⁡0≤n≤N∥Un−Phu(tn)∥∞≤CT(τ+hmax⁡2),tn=nτ.

This result is for rectangular Cartesian TPFA grids and solutions with the stated even C4 boundary compatibility; it does not assert mesh-uniform accuracy for general admissible polyhedral meshes.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The rectangular no-flux TPFA grid, the periodic centered grid on the doubled torus, a smooth even-reflectable solution in R, and exact reaction-then-diffusion subflows.

[F1]

Cell-centered rectangular TPFA grid with homogeneous no-flux boundaries: the no-flux stencil uses the actual adjacent neighbor in the interior and a reflected copy of the boundary cell for a missing neighbor; Eh copies each cell value evenly to the doubled grid.

[F2]

Periodic rectangular reaction-diffusion grid: on the doubled grid the positive stencil is the periodic centered operator with widths hj.

[F3]

Mesh-uniform first-order Lie error for a smooth periodic reaction-diffusion solution: for a smooth periodic solution in R, the exact periodic Lie iterates from sampled data have maximum-norm error at most CT(τ+hmax⁡2) with a mesh-independent constant.

[F4]

Exact reaction-then-diffusion Lie step on FV or periodic grids: the step is the pointwise exact reaction flow followed by the exact specieswise exponential diffusion map.

[F5]

Inward reaction fields preserve rectangles and stoichiometric mass: the reaction IVP is unique and its flow is defined for all finite nonnegative times on R.

[F6]

Finite matrix exponential series and its identities: finite matrix exponentials are defined by a convergent power series.

[A1]

The even reflection in the Statement is Ct1Cx4; in particular its derivatives through the boundary interfaces match, and it is periodic on the doubled torus.

Proof

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

For each coordinate define rj(kj)=kj if 0≤kj<Nj and rj(kj)=2Nj−1−kj if Nj≤kj<2Nj. Then (EhU)k=U(rj(kj))j. At an interior original index, the doubled periodic stencil uses the same two neighbors as AhN. At the left boundary, the doubled neighbor kj=−1 is represented by 2Nj−1, whose reflected index is 0, so its value is Ui; the right-boundary ghost similarly equals the last cell value. Therefore A2hperEhU=EhAhNU for every array U.

2.1F4F5F6step 1.1inductionalgebra

From step 1.1, (A2hper)kEh=Eh(AhN)k for every integer k≥0, by induction. The exponential power series [F6] then gives e−τdrA2hperEh=Ehe−τdrAhN for each species. The nodewise reaction flow also commutes with Eh: reflected copies start from identical values and solve the same IVP, so uniqueness [F5] keeps them identical.

3.1F1F2F4step 2.1induction

At time zero, EhPhu(0) is exactly the sample of the even-reflected continuous initial data on the doubled torus. Step 2.1 shows that the periodic split update of this array is the even extension of the no-flux TPFA split update. Induction over n therefore identifies the periodic numerical iterates with EhUn.

4.1A1F1F2F3step 3.1algebra∎

The even-reflected function is Ct1Cx4 by [A1]. On every reflected open subrectangle, reflection preserves the Laplacian and acts only by coordinate sign changes on first derivatives; since the PDE has constant diagonal diffusion and pointwise reaction, the reflected function satisfies the same equation there. The equality extends across each interface by continuity of the function and its time and second spatial derivatives. Thus the doubled function solves the periodic problem covered by [F3]. Its samples are EhPhu(tn), and step 3.1 plus reflection gives ∥EhUn−EhPhu(tn)∥∞=∥Un−Phu(tn)∥∞. Apply [F3] on the doubled grid, whose counts 2Nj are at least four, to obtain the bound.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources