Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Mesh-uniform reaction-diffusion commutator bound on a periodic grid

Statement

Let u:[0,T]×TLd→R have bounded spatial derivatives through order two, with R a compact rectangle. Let F∈C2 on a neighborhood of R, and let Ah=−DAhper be the periodic-grid diffusion generator from Periodic rectangular reaction-diffusion grid. Define Fh(Phu)=Ph(F(u)) pointwise. Then, uniformly over all periodic grids with hj=Lj/Nj and Nj≥3, sup⁡Nj≥3 (1≤j≤d), 0≤t≤T∥AhFh(Phu(t))−DF(Phu(t))AhPhu(t)∥∞≤Ccom<∞, where Ccom depends only on the dimension, D, the suprema of D2u, DF, D2F, and the compact state rectangle, not on the mesh widths. This is the finite-grid commutator used in the first-order split-error proof; it is not a claim for arbitrary meshes or unbounded operators.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The periodic uniform grid, a diagonal nonnegative diffusion matrix, u with bounded spatial derivatives through order two, and F∈C2 on a neighborhood of the compact range of u.

[F1]

Periodic rectangular reaction-diffusion grid: Ah=−DAhper and each coordinate of Ahper is a centered second difference divided by hj2.

[F2]

Reaction vector fields and quasi-positivity: F is defined on an open neighborhood of R; the additional C2 assumption is in the Statement.

[F3]

The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a): if G is differentiable on a compact interval, including its one-sided endpoint derivatives, and G′ is Darboux integrable there, then ∫abG′=G(b)−G(a).

[F4]

A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion: a continuous scalar function on a compact interval is bounded and Darboux integrable.

[F5]

The mean value theorem, as the case g(x)=x of Cauchy's: for f continuous on [a,b] with a<b and differentiable on (a,b) there is c∈(a,b) with f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a): if a scalar function is continuous on a closed interval and differentiable in its interior, its endpoint difference equals an interior derivative times the interval length.

[F6]

A function differentiable at c is continuous at c: a differentiable scalar function is continuous at each point of differentiability; in particular, an everywhere existing second derivative makes the first derivative continuous on each coordinate interval.

[A1]

The range of u lies in a compact rectangle R and the displayed derivatives are uniformly bounded on [0,T]×TLd.

Proof

1.1A1F3F4F5F6givenalgebra

Let w be a twice differentiable scalar function on a coordinate lift with bounded w′′. By [F6], w′ is continuous; hence s↦w′(x+s)−w′(x−s) is continuous and integrable on [0,h] by [F4]. Apply [F3] to the differentiable function s↦w(x+s)+w(x−s)−2w(x), whose endpoint derivatives are the corresponding one-sided restrictions. This gives w(x+h)−2w(x)+w(x−h)=∫0h(w′(x+s)−w′(x−s)) ds. For s>0, [F5] applied to w′ on [x−s,x+s] gives ∣w′(x+s)−w′(x−s)∣≤2s∥w′′∥∞; at s=0 this also holds. Integrating yields ∣w(x+h)−2w(x)+w(x−h)∣≤h2∥w′′∥∞. Thus the centered second difference divided by h2 has the same mesh-independent bound. Only the continuous first derivative was integrated; integrability or continuity of w′′ is not assumed.

2.1A1F2F3F4F5F6step 1.1algebra

Fix a component i and a spatial direction j. The chain rule first gives ∂j(Fi(u))=∑k∂kFi(u) ∂juk. Applying the product rule to each summand and the chain rule to ∂kFi(u) gives ∂jj(Fi(u))=∑k∂kFi(u) ∂jjuk+∑k,ℓ∂kℓFi(u)(∂juk)(∂juℓ). These are pointwise identities under the stated second-order spatial differentiability of u and F∈C2 near its range. To express the bound using only the quantities listed in the Statement, let wk=sup⁡Rzk−inf⁡Rzk and Hkj=∥∂jjuk∥∞. For g(s)=uk(x+sej,t) on the periodic lift, g′ is continuous by [F6], and r↦g′(r)−g′(0) is integrable on [0,s] by [F4]. Apply [F3] to r↦g(r)−g(0)−rg′(0) to get g(s)−g(0)−sg′(0)=∫0s(g′(r)−g′(0)) dr. By [F5] on g′, ∣g′(r)−g′(0)∣≤rHkj for 0≤r≤s. The remainder is therefore bounded by s2Hkj/2. Since ∣g(s)−g(0)∣≤wk, this yields, for every s>0, s∣∂juk(x,t)∣≤wk+s22Hkj. If wkHkj>0, choose s=2wk/Hkj to obtain ∣∂juk∣≤2wkHkj. If Hkj=0, the same inequality for every s gives ∂juk=0; if wk=0, the component is constant and the same conclusion holds. Therefore the displayed chain-rule terms are uniformly bounded in terms of R, D2u, DF, and D2F, as asserted.

3.1A1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

In each component, AhFh(Phu) is a finite sum of di times the centered second differences of Fi∘u, while DF(Phu)AhPhu is the finite sum of ∂kFi(u)dk times the centered second differences of uk. Step 1.1 bounds each difference uniformly, and step 2.1 bounds every coefficient. There are only dm2 terms and D is fixed, so their sum is bounded by a constant independent of all hj.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources