Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Continuous reaction-diffusion mass balance on boxes, tori, and piecewise C1 domains

Statement

Let u∈C1([0,T];C2(Ω‾;Rm)) solve ut=DΔu+F(u), with constant diagonal D=diag⁡(di), and let its range lie in R. Let c be a conservation or dissipation vector on R. One may take (i) a box Ω=∏j=1d[0,Lj] with periodic identification or homogeneous Neumann data, or (ii) a bounded domain Ω⊂Rd, d≥2, with a specified finite piecewise C1 boundary presentation as in Specified finite piecewise C1 boundary presentations, assuming ACω in this second branch and homogeneous Neumann data on every face outside the edge set. For either branch,

ddt∫ΩcTu(x,t) dx=∫ΩcTF(u(x,t)) dx.

Hence the total mass is constant when cTF=0 on R and nonincreasing when cTF≤0 on R. The first branch is choice-free; ACω is used only for the stated piecewise C1 divergence-theorem branch.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth bounded solution of the diagonal semilinear system, its state rectangle, a conservation or dissipation vector, and one of the two domain and boundary-condition branches in the Statement.

[F1]

Semilinear vector reaction-diffusion systems: ut=DΔu+F(u) with constant diagonal D and periodic or homogeneous no-flux conditions.

[F2]

Stoichiometric conservation and dissipation functionals: cTF(z)=0 throughout R in the conservation case, and cTF(z)≤0 throughout R in the dissipation case.

[F3]

Riemann--Fubini on product rectangles, with lower and upper section integrals and content-zero exceptional sections: a continuous function on a compact product rectangle has equal iterated integrals in every coordinate order.

[F5]

Divergence for finite piecewise C1 presentations: under ACω, a specified finite piecewise C1 presentation and a C1 vector field give the bulk-divergence integral as the sum of outward face-flux integrals.

[F6]

Specified finite piecewise C1 boundary presentations: the bounded-domain branch has finitely many faces, an edge set null for each face, and the stated outward normal off that set.

[F7]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): ACω is the explicitly stated countable-choice axiom.

[A1]

In the box branch, opposite periodic traces match, or the outward normal derivative is zero on each face. In the piecewise C1 branch, assume ACω and ∂nui=0 on each face outside its edge set.

Proof

1.1F4givenalgebra

Since ut is continuous on the compact cylinder, the time difference quotient of cTu is the time average of cTut by [F4], and uniform continuity makes it converge uniformly to cTut. Each stated domain has finite volume, so integrating this uniform convergence proves ddt∫ΩcTu=∫ΩcTut.

2.1A1F1F3F4step 1.1algebra

In the box branch, substitute [F1] into step 1.1. The diffusion contribution is ∑icidi∫ΩΔui dx. For each coordinate j, [F3] permits integration in xj first, and [F4] gives ∫0Lj∂jjui dxj=∂jui∣xj=Lj−∂jui∣xj=0. This difference is zero for matching periodic traces and is zero for homogeneous Neumann data. Summing over components and coordinates makes the total diffusion contribution vanish.

2.2A1F5F6F7step 1.1algebra

In the specified piecewise C1 branch, each vector field ∇ui is C1 on the closure. Apply [F5] using the domain presentation [F6] and the axiom assumption [F7]: ∫ΩΔui dx=∑j∫Sj∇ui⋅νj dS. By [A1], the integrand is zero on every face outside its surface-null edge set; hence every face integral vanishes. Thus the diffusion contribution to step 1.1 is also zero in this branch.

3.1F2step 2.1step 2.2algebra∎

In either branch, after the diffusion term vanishes, the remaining derivative is ∫ΩcTF(u(x,t)) dx. By [F2] its integrand is identically zero in the conservation case and nonpositive in the dissipation case. Integrating proves the claimed mass derivative and monotonicity.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

42 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources