Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Reeb-Thurston stability for codimension-one leaves with vanishing first real cohomology

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let F be a C1 transversely oriented codimension-one foliation of a smooth manifold M, and let L be a compact leaf with H1(L;R)=0 (Singular cohomology with coefficients). Then L has a saturated open neighbourhood whose leaves are all C1-diffeomorphic to L. In fact the holonomy of L is trivial and the neighbourhood can be chosen to be a product foliated neighbourhood L×D for an open interval D. This is the local cohomological refinement; no global fibration conclusion is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A C1 transversely oriented codimension-one foliation F of a smooth manifold M, a compact leaf L with H1(L;R)=0, and a base point x∈L.

[F1]

A compact leaf of a C1 codimension-one foliation is an embedded hypersurface, and plaque transport along leafwise loops defines the holonomy homomorphism ρx:π1(L,x)→Diff⁡x1,+(T) (Holonomy of a C¹ foliation is a representation into C¹ transverse germs, C¹ codimension-one regular foliations and transverse orientation).

[F2]

Under the Axiom of Choice, π1(L,x) is finitely generated for a compact leaf L (A compact C¹ leaf has finitely generated fundamental group).

[F3]

The image of a finitely generated group under a homomorphism is finitely generated (Images of finitely generated and of finite groups are finitely generated and finite).

[F4]

Diff⁡01,+(R) is locally indicable: every nontrivial finitely generated subgroup admits a surjection onto Z (Thurston stability: groups of orientation-preserving C¹ interval germs are locally indicable).

[F5]

For a path-connected space L, H0(L;Z)≅Z is free, hence projective, and the universal coefficient theorem in degree one gives H1(L;R)≅Hom⁡(H1(L;Z),R); the degree-one Hurewicz map identifies H1(L;Z) with the abelianization of π1(L,x), so H1(L;R)≅Hom⁡(π1(L,x),R) (Zero-th singular homology is free on path components, The universal coefficient theorem for cohomology over a PID, The first Hurewicz map is abelianization, Free modules are projective, with the exact choice boundary, The singular chain complex and singular homology, Singular cochain complex with coefficients).

[F6]

A compact leaf with trivial C1 holonomy has a saturated product neighbourhood (U,F∣U)≅(L×D,{L×{t}}), and U is a union of leaves (Trivial C¹ holonomy gives a saturated product neighbourhood, Saturated neighbourhoods of a leaf).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F2F5

(π1 and the real cohomology of L.) The leaf L is compact and connected, so π1(L,x) is finitely generated by [F2], and L is path-connected; [F5] gives H1(L;R)≅Hom⁡(π1(L,x),R). Thus the hypothesis H1(L;R)=0 says exactly that every homomorphism π1(L,x)→R is zero.

2.1F1F2F3F4step 1.1

(Holonomy is trivial.) The holonomy of L is the homomorphism ρx:π1(L,x)→Diff⁡x1,+(T) of [F1]. Suppose its image H were nontrivial. Then H is a finitely generated subgroup of the group of C1 germs, by [F3] applied to ρx and [F2]; by local indicability [F4] there is a surjective homomorphism H↠Z. Composing with the inclusion Z↪R and with ρx yields a nonzero homomorphism π1(L,x)→R, that is, by step 1.1 a nonzero element of H1(L;R), contradicting the hypothesis. Hence H is trivial and the holonomy of L vanishes.

3.1F6step 2.1∎

(Product neighbourhood and diffeomorphic leaves.) Since L is compact and has trivial C1 holonomy, [F6] provides a saturated open neighbourhood U of L and a C1 foliated diffeomorphism U≅L×D carrying F∣U to the product foliation by the slices; in particular every leaf of F meeting U is C1-diffeomorphic to L, and U is a union of leaves. This proves the local cohomological stability statement.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

86 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources