How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Sobolev approximation by local spline quasi-interpolants
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let , , and . Let be a nonempty family of clamped degree- knot meshes on , and let be a mesh-uniform bounded local quasi-interpolant family as in Bounded local spline quasi-interpolants, with common constants and . Fix , write , and let with its continuous Sobolev representative. For each nonempty cell of , let be its corresponding neighborhood and let be the largest cell length in . Then Writing , the global bound is where for . In particular, on a uniform mesh with interior knots of multiplicity , the cellwise projector onto is a local quasi-interpolant and gives the order- approximation bound for every integer .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC; , , ; a mesh-uniform family and a fixed mesh ; and real-valued .
Assume the Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Choice. It is used through the supplied one-dimensional Sobolev representative theorem for Taylor values and integral remainders.
, , real-valued , and belongs to the mesh-uniform family from Bounded local spline quasi-interpolants.
The class has weak derivatives through order in (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).
Under AC, each one-dimensional class has a unique absolutely continuous representative on the closed finite interval, with increments equal to integrals of its weak derivative (One-dimensional functions have unique absolutely continuous representatives).
For conjugate exponents, ; in particular the norm bounds the integral on a finite interval, with the usual endpoint conventions (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases).
Orthogonal vectors satisfy the Pythagorean identity (Pythagoras, the parallelogram identity, and the real and complex polarisation identities).
In ZF, the Axiom of Choice implies Countable Choice and the prescribed-start form of Dependent Choice used by the Sobolev and one-dimensional representative interfaces (AC supplies the countable and dependent choices used in Banach integration).
Proof
On any neighborhood , use the continuous representatives of , , supplied by [F2]. Their Sobolev-class convention [F1] and the choice hypotheses for [F2] are available under [A1] by [F5]. Repeated integration by parts for absolutely continuous functions gives the Taylor identity where . For completeness, the case is the increment formula in [F2]; passing from order to integrates by parts with antiderivative , producing the degree- endpoint term and the displayed remainder. For finite , Hölder [F3] bounds the pointwise remainder by , where and for ; multiplying by gives . For , integrating the kernel in the remainder gives the same bound.
Choose as the left endpoint of and write . Since reproduces , . Because , the triangle inequality and local stability give The definition gives ; applying step 1.1 proves the stated local estimate.
Raise the local estimates to the th power and sum over the disjoint mesh cells. Each point belongs to at most neighborhoods, so . Taking the th root and using gives the stated global bound for finite . For , take the maximum of the local bounds; the factor is .
For a uniform mesh with interior knots repeated times, is the space of independent degree- polynomials on the cells by the definition and basis theorem. On a cell , use the real pairing : it is finite by Hölder [F3], bilinear and symmetric by linearity of the integral, and positive definite since implies each set has measure zero, hence almost everywhere. Put , , and . For any nonzero coefficient vector , , since a nonzero polynomial has only finitely many roots; hence is invertible. For , put and , and define on . The defining equations give for every . Thus is linear, fixes , and has residual orthogonal to its range; Pythagoras [F4] gives . Assign knot values from the cell on their right and the value at by the left limit. The cellwise polynomials then form a member of . As varies, these operators form a mesh-uniform local quasi-interpolant family with one-cell neighborhoods, , and . Applying steps 1.1–3.1 with gives for .
Depends on
- Bounded local spline quasi-interpolants
- B-spline basis properties and polynomial reproduction
- Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms
- One-dimensional $W^{1,p}$ functions have unique absolutely continuous representatives
- The Axiom of Choice
- AC supplies the countable and dependent choices used in Banach integration
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
- The orthogonal projection $P_Wv$ is the $W$-component in $V=W\oplus W^\perp$
- Orthogonal projection is linear, and an orthonormal basis $(e_i)$ of $W$ gives $P_Wv=\sum_i\langle v,e_i\rangle e_i$
- The orthogonal projection is the unique nearest point in the subspace
- Pythagoras, the parallelogram identity, and the real and complex polarisation identities
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
54 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Tom Lyche, Carla Manni, and Hendrik Speleers, B-Splines and Spline Approximation, §§2.1–2.2, Theorem 32 and Example 33 (standard reference, not scraped)