Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Spectral series solution of an invertible symmetric elliptic problem

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice. In the symmetric case of The L2 operator associated with a symmetric elliptic form with Ω nonempty bounded open, suppose 0 is not an eigenvalue of L (equivalently, by Discrete spectrum of a symmetric elliptic Dirichlet operator, no nonzero u∈H01(Ω) satisfies a(u,v)=0 for all v; this holds in particular when a is coercive on H01(Ω)). Then L:D(L)→L2(Ω) is bijective, and for every f∈L2(Ω) the unique weak solution u∈H01(Ω) of a(u,v)=(f,v)L2 for all v is u=L−1f=∑j≥1(f,ej)L2λj ej, the series converging in L2(Ω) and in H01(Ω); moreover u∈D(L) with Lu=f and ∥u∥L2≤(min⁡j∣λj∣)−1∥f∥L2 (and ∥u∥L2≤λ1−1∥f∥L2 when λ1>0, in particular under coercivity of a).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice; a nonempty bounded open set Ω⊆Rn; the symmetric divergence-form case with form a and operator L; the eigenbasis {ej} and eigenvalue list λj→+∞ of the discrete spectral theorem; the hypothesis that 0 is not an eigenvalue; and f∈L2(Ω).

[F1]

Spectral series for the inverse at λ=0: the complex spectrum of the relevant complex realization is σ(L~)={λj}, and the corollary gives the base-field inverse series for every real parameter outside this list. Since 0 is not an eigenvalue, L is bijective with bounded inverse L−1, and L−1f=∑j(f,ej)L2λj−1ej with convergence in L2(Ω) and in H01(Ω) (Non-invertible elliptic shifts form a discrete set in the self-adjoint case, Discrete spectrum of a symmetric elliptic Dirichlet operator).

[F2]

Weak solutions: u∈H01(Ω) is a weak solution of the Dirichlet problem with datum f∈L2(Ω) exactly when u∈D(L) and Lu=f (The L2 operator associated with a symmetric elliptic form, Weak Dirichlet solutions for a divergence-form operator).

[F3]

Parseval: ∥f∥L22=∑j∣(f,ej)L2∣2 for every f∈L2(Ω), and the eigenbasis is orthonormal (Eigenbasis expansion in the form norm, Discrete spectrum of a symmetric elliptic Dirichlet operator).

[F4]

Rayleigh: if λ1>0 then all λj≥λ1, and coercivity of a with constant α′>0 implies λ1≥α′>0 and hence that 0 is not an eigenvalue (The Rayleigh principle for the first Dirichlet eigenvalue, The L2 operator associated with a symmetric elliptic form).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1given

Bijectivity and the series. The hypothesis says 0 is not a weak eigenvalue, so L is injective; since the eigenvalues of L are exactly the list {λj}, the resolvent corollary [F1] applies with λ=0 and gives that L is bijective with bounded inverse and that the inverse is the displayed series, converging in L2(Ω) and in H01(Ω).

2.1F1F2step 1.1given

The weak solution. For f∈L2(Ω) put u:=L−1f, which lies in D(L) with Lu=f; by [F2] u is the unique weak solution of a(u,v)=(f,v)L2 for all v, and by step 1.1 it is the series of the statement. Since L is injective with range L2(Ω), the weak solution is unique, so this identifies the solution set with the single class u.

2.2F3step 1.1givenalgebra

The norm bound. Put δ:=inf⁡j∣λj∣>0 (positive because λj→+∞ and no λj=0). The series of step 1.1 and Parseval [F3] give ∥u∥L22=∑j∣(f,ej)L2∣2λj2≤δ−2∑j∣(f,ej)L2∣2=δ−2∥f∥L22, that is ∥u∥L2≤(min⁡j∣λj∣)−1∥f∥L2. If λ1>0 all λj≥λ1>0, so min⁡j∣λj∣=λ1 and the sharper bound ∥u∥L2≤λ1−1∥f∥L2 holds.

3.1F4step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2given∎

Coercivity gives the hypothesis. If a is coercive with constant α′>0 then a(u,u)≥α′∥u∥L22>0 for every nonzero u, so 0 cannot be a weak eigenvalue and the previous conclusions apply; by [F4] one also has λ1≥α′>0, so the sharper bound of step 2.2 is available.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

61 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources