Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Stable normal bundle is independent of the embedding

Statement

For embeddings ij:M↪RNj of a compact smooth manifold, νi0⊕εN1≅νi1⊕εN0. Thus the stable normal class is intrinsic. The same assertion holds for compact manifolds with boundary. The countable-choice hypothesis ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)) is inherited from the normal-bundle identifications of Stable normal bundle of a compact smooth manifold; the transport below adds no further choice.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The two embeddings and Euclidean metrics.

[F1]

Stable normal bundle of a compact smooth manifold identifies the normal bundle of an embedding with the fibrewise orthogonal complement of the tangent image, smoothly over the base, with the half-space form at boundary points.

[F2]

Linear matrix ODEs have unique global solutions on a fixed interval gives a unique global matrix solution on the compact time interval for each fixed value of a parameter; Smooth dependence of ODE solutions on parameters gives local smooth dependence of solutions on that parameter.

[F3]

The tangent bundle of a smooth manifold is a smooth vector bundle and so admits smooth local frames (Assuming countable choice, the tangent bundle has a canonical smooth 2n-manifold structure, Smooth vector bundles, rank, fibres, and trivial bundles).

[F4]

Smooth coordinate maps on relatively open half-space sets have smooth Euclidean extensions near each point (Smooth functions on relatively open half-space sets).

Proof

1.1F1F3construct

If N0+N1=0, all tangent and normal fibres are zero and the unique zero-bundle isomorphism proves the assertion; assume the ambient dimension is positive below. In RN0⊕RN1 set jt(x)=(cos⁡(πt/2)i0(x),sin⁡(πt/2)i1(x)). At least one coefficient is nonzero; hence jt is injective and djt is injective on each tangent space, because the coefficient that does not vanish already forces equality of x, respectively vanishing of the tangent vector. Let Qt(x) be the orthogonal projection onto djt(TxM) and Pt=I−Qt. In a smooth local frame e1,…,en of TM from [F3], the matrix A(t,x) with columns djt(ei(x)) has full column rank, and Qt(x)=A(ATA)−1AT is smooth in (t,x); the same formula applies in boundary charts. For a zero-dimensional M, the frame is empty and the formula reads Qt=0, Pt=I. Thus Pt is a smooth family of orthogonal projections with ker⁡Pt=djt(TM)=djt(TxM) fibrewise. At t=0 one has im⁡P0=di0(TxM)⊥⊕RN1 and at t=1 one has im⁡P1=RN0⊕di1(TxM)⊥, and [F1] identifies the orthogonal summands with νi0 and νi1 smoothly over M, in the half-space form at boundary points.

2.1F2F3F4step 1.1algebraconstruct

Put Kt=P˙tPt−PtP˙t and solve U˙t=KtUt, U0=I in the finite-dimensional ambient space, with x∈M as a parameter. For each fixed x the coefficients t↦Kt(x) are smooth, so [F2] gives a unique solution on all of [0,1]; For an interior parameter chart, the coefficients are defined on an open time-state-parameter domain, so [F2] gives local smooth dependence. At a boundary parameter point use [F4] to extend the coordinate functions of i0,i1 and the local frame to an open Euclidean parameter neighbourhood; shrink it so both embedding differentials and the frame remain full rank. The same formula for A(t,x) then stays full rank on an open time interval containing [0,1], since its sine and cosine coefficients never vanish together. Hence Pt and Kt have smooth extensions on an open time-parameter domain, and the vector field (t,U,x)↦Kt(x)U is smooth on an open time-state-parameter domain as required by [F2]. Apply that theorem on the extension and restrict back to the half-space. On the compact time interval, finitely many local continuations and uniqueness glue these solution maps to a smooth Ut(x); the restricted extensions give smoothness up to the boundary. Since KtT=−Kt, differentiating UTU gives zero, so every Ut is orthogonal. Differentiating Pt2=Pt gives PtP˙tPt=0, whence KP−PK=(P˙P−PP˙)P−P(P˙P−PP˙)=P˙P+PP˙=P˙, so ddt(Ut−1PtUt)=Ut−1(−KtPt+P˙t+PtKt)Ut=0 and Ut−1PtUt=P0. Passing to t=1, the smooth family x↦U1(x) restricts to a smooth bundle isomorphism im⁡P0→im⁡P1 over M.

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1∎

By step 1.1 the initial complement bundle is νi0⊕εN1 and the final one is εN0⊕νi1, so with the reordering of the two orthogonal summands the bundle isomorphism of step 2.1 gives νi0⊕εN1≅νi1⊕εN0. This proves the intrinsic nature of the stable normal class and applies verbatim to compact manifolds with boundary, where the same fibrewise orthogonal projections are smooth in boundary charts. For empty M the assertion is the unique map of zero bundles. No summand has been cancelled: both sides retain their unstable ranks. The countable choice of [F1] is the only choice used; the ODE transport selects the solution of a linear equation with Lipschitz coefficients and adds none.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources