How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Freyd's axioms force the additive structure and recover the AB2 definition
Statement
If a category satisfies Freyd's axioms A0, A1, A1*, A2, A2*, A3, and A3*, then it is additive. Moreover, for every morphism the canonical map from the coimage to the image is an isomorphism, so the category is abelian in the working sense of Abelian category.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A category satisfying Freyd's axioms A0, A1, A1*, A2, A2*, A3, and A3*.
Freyd's axioms are the zero-object, binary product, binary coproduct, kernel, cokernel, normal-monic, and conormal-epic clauses listed in Freyd's axioms A0, A1, A1*, A2, A2*, A3, and A3* for abelian categories.
Once one object carries both the product and coproduct structures with the standard zero equations, the canonical comparison is the identity and the object is a biproduct (Biproduct data characterisation without addition).
Finite biproducts give a canonical commutative-monoid enrichment on hom-sets, and [L4] makes that enrichment unique (A category with finite biproducts is enriched in commutative monoids, The commutative-monoid enrichment of a category with finite biproducts is unique).
Earlier on this page, image, coimage, their factorization maps, and the canonical coimage-to-image morphism were constructed from kernels and cokernels (Image and coimage in a category with kernels and cokernels, A morphism factors uniquely through its coimage, A morphism factors uniquely through its image, The canonical morphism from the coimage to the image exists and is unique).
Every coequalizer is epic (Every equalizer is a monomorphism, and every coequalizer is an epimorphism).
Proof
Freyd's axioms already make balanced: if is monic and epic, the normality clause writes as a kernel of some , so ; because is epic, , and the identity is a kernel of , so is isomorphic to .
Let and be the coproduct and product supplied by [L1]. The split epics and are cokernels of the opposite injections because maps out of a coproduct are determined by the injections; dually the split monics and are kernels of the opposite projections because maps into a product are determined by the projections. Therefore the canonical comparison is both monic and epic, so step 1.1 makes it an isomorphism. Thus binary biproducts exist, and together with the zero-object clause this gives finite biproducts.
By [L3], the finite biproducts from step 2.1 give a canonical commutative-monoid law on each hom-set. On , Mitchell's shear is monic and epic by the same kernel-cokernel argument used in step 2.1, hence invertible by step 1.1. Writing , the matrix identity yields in the monoid law of [L3]. For every , the morphism is therefore an additive inverse of , so the hom-monoids are abelian groups. Hence is preadditive, and with finite biproducts it is additive.
Let , let be its kernel, let be the cokernel of , let be the kernel of a cokernel of , and let be the canonical morphism from [L4]. Put . To show that is monic, let satisfy , let be a cokernel of , and write . Since is a composite of cokernels, [L5] makes it epic, so the conormality clause gives some with . Now , so factors through ; hence . Because is a cokernel of , the map factors through as . Since is epic by [L5], , so is monic. Then forces , and is monic.
The dual argument shows that the factorization map is epic: starting from a kernel of a map out of , one passes to the opposite category and repeats step 4.1. Since is monic and is epic by [L5], the equalities and imply that itself is monic and epic. Step 1.1 then makes an isomorphism.
Thus every morphism has kernels and cokernels and an invertible canonical coimage-to-image comparison. Together with the additivity from step 3.1, this is exactly the working abelian definition of Abelian category.
Depends on
- Freyd's axioms A0, A1, A1*, A2, A2*, A3, and A3* for abelian categories
- Biproduct data characterisation without addition
- A category with finite biproducts is enriched in commutative monoids
- The commutative-monoid enrichment of a category with finite biproducts is unique
- Abelian category
- Image and coimage in a category with kernels and cokernels
- A morphism factors uniquely through its coimage
- A morphism factors uniquely through its image
- The canonical morphism from the coimage to the image exists and is unique
- Every equalizer is a monomorphism, and every coequalizer is an epimorphism
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter Freyd, Abelian Categories, Theorem 2.39 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Barry Mitchell, Theory of Categories, Proposition 18.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Junhan Tan, The Freyd-Mitchell Embedding Theorem, Theorem 2.11 (standard reference, not scraped)