How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Gaussian ULA invariant law has variance
Statement
Assume AC, let on , and let . For every , the one-dimensional ULA kernel of Unadjusted Langevin algorithm (ULA) has the invariant probability Every invariant probability with finite second moment has variance . Thus its invariant variance is not the target variance . No uniqueness claim is made for invariant laws without a finite second moment.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, the standard Gaussian target, and the ULA update with .
AC is assumed in the standard-normal construction and characteristic-function uniqueness. The Axiom of Choice
For this potential, and the ULA update is , where is independent of the current state. Unadjusted Langevin algorithm (ULA) The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case
The normal-law convention is Standard normal and normal laws; the characteristic function of is , and its mean and variance are and . Characteristic function of a normal law Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space
Affine transforms and finite independent sums multiply the corresponding characteristic functions. Characteristic functions under affine maps and independent sums
Equal characteristic functions determine equal Borel probability laws. Uniqueness of a law from its characteristic function
For independent square-integrable variables, expectations factor and finite linear combinations commute with expectation. Expectations factor over finite products of independent random variables The Lebesgue integral is linear on
A square-integrable variable is integrable by Cauchy–Schwarz on a probability space. Cauchy-Schwarz for random variables
Proof
Given: AC, , and the ULA transition in [F1].
Set and let be independent of . By [F2]–[F3], the updated state has characteristic function Direct algebra gives , so [F2] and [F4] imply . This proves that is invariant.
Let have any invariant law with finite second moment, independently of the fresh standard normal . By [F6], is integrable, and [F5] gives because and the cross-covariance of the independent variables is zero. Invariance gives , so Since , this exceeds .
Depends on
- Unadjusted Langevin algorithm (ULA)
- The Axiom of Choice
- The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case
- Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space
- Standard normal and normal laws
- Characteristic function of a normal law
- Characteristic functions under affine maps and independent sums
- Uniqueness of a law from its characteristic function
- Expectations factor over finite products of independent random variables
- The Lebesgue integral is linear on $L^1(\mu)$
- Cauchy-Schwarz for random variables
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
62 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Alain Durmus and Éric Moulines, Non-asymptotic convergence analysis for the Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm, §3.3, Gaussian-target calculation (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gautam Iyer, Lecture 20: Langevin Monte Carlo, course notes, §3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)