Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Uniformization of simply connected Riemann surfaces

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Every simply connected Riemann surface (Riemann surfaces and holomorphic atlases) is biholomorphic to exactly one of the Riemann sphere C^, the complex plane C and the unit disc D (Biholomorphic maps between complex domains).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice; a simply connected Riemann surface X; a point p0∈X; the Perron envelope gX(⋅,p0) of Canonical Green kernel on a Riemann surface.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice): every family of nonempty sets has a choice function; applied to countable families it yields the Countable Choice ACω of The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), which is the hypothesis of the dichotomy supplier [F3].

[F1]

Riemann surfaces and biholomorphy (Riemann surfaces and holomorphic atlases, Biholomorphic maps between complex domains): a Riemann surface is nonempty, connected, Hausdorff and second countable with a holomorphic atlas; a biholomorphism of Riemann surfaces is a bijective holomorphic map whose inverse is holomorphic, and the relation "X is biholomorphic to Y" is symmetric and transitive because composites and inverses of biholomorphisms are again of that kind.

[F2]

Canonical Green kernel and Perron envelope (Canonical Green kernel on a Riemann surface): for a Riemann surface X and a point p the Perron family Fp and its envelope gX(⋅,p)=sup⁡{v(⋅):v∈Fp} are defined, with values in [0,+∞] on X∖{p}; X admits a finite canonical Green kernel at p exactly when gX(q,p)<+∞ for every q∈X∖{p}.

[F3]

Dichotomy (Green envelope dichotomy, logarithmic pole and leastness on a Riemann surface): for a Riemann surface V and a pole p, either gV(q,p)=+∞ for every q∈V∖{p}, or gV(⋅,p) is finite (and strictly positive and harmonic) on V∖{p}; the lemma assumes Countable Choice.

[F4]

The Green case (A simply connected Greenian Riemann surface is a disc): under the Axiom of Choice, a simply connected Riemann surface which admits a finite canonical Green kernel at some point p0 is biholomorphic to the unit disc D.

[F5]

The non-Green case (A simply connected surface without a Green kernel is plane or sphere): under the Axiom of Choice, a simply connected Riemann surface whose canonical Green envelope is infinite at some point p0, that is, gX(q,p0)=+∞ for every q∈X∖{p0}, is biholomorphic to the complex plane C if it is noncompact, and to the Riemann sphere C^ if it is compact.

[F6]

The models are pairwise distinct (The sphere, plane and disc are pairwise biholomorphically distinct): the Riemann sphere, the complex plane and the unit disc are simply connected Riemann surfaces, and no two of them are biholomorphic.

Proof

1.1A1F1F2F3given

Setup and the dichotomy at the chosen pole. The surface X is nonempty [F1], so fix a point p0∈X; by [F2] the envelope gX(⋅,p0) is defined on X∖{p0} with values in [0,+∞]. Since the Axiom of Choice [A1] supplies the Countable Choice required by [F3], the dichotomy applies to the pole p0: either gX(q,p0)=+∞ for every q∈X∖{p0}, or gX(⋅,p0) is finite on X∖{p0}, which by [F2] says exactly that X admits a finite canonical Green kernel at p0.

2.1F4assume-case finitestep 1.1

Finite case: X is the disc. If X admits a finite canonical Green kernel at p0, then the Green case [F4] applies to the simply connected surface X and provides a biholomorphism of X onto the unit disc D.

2.2F5assume-case infinitestep 1.1

Infinite case: X is the plane or the sphere. If instead gX(q,p0)=+∞ for every q∈X∖{p0}, then the non-Green case [F5] applies: X is biholomorphic to C when X is noncompact, and to C^ when X is compact.

3.1F3F6cases-exhaustivestep 2.1step 2.2

Every simply connected surface is one of the three models. The two alternatives of step 1.1 exhaust the possibilities for the envelope gX(⋅,p0) by the dichotomy [F3]; hence steps 2.1 and 2.2 show that X is biholomorphic to D, to C or to C^. Moreover the last two are themselves simply connected Riemann surfaces [F6], so each alternative really is one of the three models.

4.1F1F6step 3.1

At most one model. Suppose that X is biholomorphic to two of the models, say to M1 and to M2 with M1,M2∈{C^,C,D}; then M1 is biholomorphic to M2, because the composite of a biholomorphism X→M1 with the inverse of a biholomorphism X→M2 is again a biholomorphism [F1]. By [F6] no two distinct members of {C^,C,D} are biholomorphic, so M1=M2. Hence X is biholomorphic to at most one of the three models.

5.1A1F3F4F5step 3.1step 4.1∎

Conclusion and choice accounting. Steps 3.1 and 4.1 together say that X is biholomorphic to exactly one of the Riemann sphere, the complex plane and the unit disc, which is the statement. The Axiom of Choice [A1] is used exactly through the Countable Choice consumed by the dichotomy [F3] in step 1.1 and through its two uses in the branch lemmas, namely the Riemann mapping theorem inside [F4] and [F5]; beyond the single point p0 chosen in step 1.1 no selection is made.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

75 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources