Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A simply connected Greenian Riemann surface is a disc

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let X be a simply connected Riemann surface (Riemann surfaces and holomorphic atlases, Simply connected topological spaces) which admits a finite canonical Green kernel at some point p0∈X (Canonical Green kernel on a Riemann surface). Then X is biholomorphic to the unit disc D.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice; a simply connected Riemann surface X; a point p0∈X; the Perron envelope g0:=gX(⋅,p0) of Canonical Green kernel on a Riemann surface, finite on X∖{p0}; a centred chart z:U→D at p0.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice): every family of nonempty sets has a choice function; applied to countable families this yields the Countable Choice ACω of The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) used by the Green-envelope suppliers [F3] and [F5], and it is the hypothesis of the Riemann mapping theorem in [F15].

[F1]

Riemann surfaces and holomorphic maps (Riemann surfaces and holomorphic atlases, Holomorphic maps and meromorphic functions on Riemann surfaces): X is nonempty, connected, Hausdorff and second countable with a holomorphic atlas, a nonempty connected open subset with the restricted charts is again a Riemann surface, and centred charts exist at every point (Canonical Green kernel on a Riemann surface); restrictions and composites of holomorphic maps between Riemann surfaces are holomorphic, and every holomorphic map is continuous.

[F2]

Canonical Green kernel and Perron family (Canonical Green kernel on a Riemann surface): centred charts, the Perron family Fp(V) of nonnegative subharmonic functions on V∖{p} vanishing off a compact set K⊆V and having at most a unit logarithmic pole at p, the envelope gV(⋅,p)=sup⁡{v(⋅):v∈Fp(V)}, and the notion of a finite canonical Green kernel at p.

[F3]

Dichotomy, logarithmic pole and leastness (Green envelope dichotomy, logarithmic pole and leastness on a Riemann surface): for a Riemann surface V and a pole p, the envelope of Fp(V) is either +∞ everywhere on V∖{p}, or finite, strictly positive and harmonic there with gV(⋅,p)+log⁡∣w∣ extending harmonically across p for every centred chart w; in the finite case gV(⋅,p)≤H for every positive harmonic H on V∖{p} whose sum with log⁡∣w∣ extends harmonically across p.

[F4]

Harmonic conjugates and logarithmic poles (Harmonic conjugates and integral logarithmic-pole monodromy on surfaces): for a simply connected Riemann surface Y, a finite set P⊆Y and a harmonic u:Y∖P→R which in centred charts at the points of P has the form u=−mjlog⁡∣wj∣+hj with mj∈Z and hj harmonic, the function u has a locally defined harmonic conjugate on Y∖P and F:=exp⁡(−(u+iv)) is a single-valued holomorphic function Y∖P→C× with ∣F∣=e−u which extends to a meromorphic function F:Y→C^ satisfying F=wjmjGj near pj with Gj holomorphic and Gj(pj)≠0; consequently F has a zero of order mj at pj when mj>0, a pole of order −mj when mj<0, is holomorphic and nonzero there when mj=0, and has no zeros or poles outside P.

[F5]

Symmetry of the kernel (Symmetry of the canonical surface Green kernel): if a Riemann surface admits finite canonical Green kernels at two distinct points p,q, then g(p,q)=g(q,p).

[F6]

Locality of subharmonicity (Locality of subharmonicity in the plane and on Riemann surfaces): a function on an open subset W of a Riemann surface is subharmonic as soon as every point of W has an open neighbourhood on which it is subharmonic, and the notion is chartwise (Chartwise harmonic and subharmonic functions on a Riemann surface).

[F7]

Chartwise analysis and the strong maximum principle (Chartwise harmonic and subharmonic functions on a Riemann surface, Plane harmonic functions, Subharmonic functions on plane domains, A C^2 function is subharmonic exactly when its Laplacian is nonnegative, Positive linear combinations and finite maxima preserve subharmonicity, A plane subharmonic function with an interior maximum is constant on its component, Upper semicontinuous real map on a topological space): harmonicity and subharmonicity of functions on a surface are the chartwise plane notions; a function is subharmonic exactly when it is upper semicontinuous, is not identically −∞ on any component, and satisfies the chartwise submean inequality, so subharmonic functions are upper semicontinuous and locally bounded above; restrictions to open subsets preserve subharmonicity; harmonic functions are subharmonic, sums and nonnegative multiples of harmonic functions are harmonic, nonnegative linear combinations and finite maxima of subharmonic functions are subharmonic; and a subharmonic function on a connected surface domain which attains its finite maximum at an interior point is constant.

[F8]

Disc automorphisms (Every automorphism of the disc is a rotated Blaschke factor): a holomorphic self-map of D is an automorphism of D if and only if it has the form w↦eiθa−w1−a‾ w with a∈D and θ∈R; in particular w↦w−a1−a‾w, whose inverse is w↦w+a1+a‾w, is an automorphism of D.

[F9]

Zeros of holomorphic functions (Zeros of a nonzero holomorphic function are isolated, The order of a zero is the exponent in its local holomorphic factorization, The locally zero locus of a holomorphic function is clopen, Open mapping theorem for holomorphic functions): a holomorphic function on a complex domain which is not identically zero has only isolated zeros, and at a zero of finite order m it factors locally as (w−w0)mg(w) with g holomorphic and g(w0)≠0; the locus of points near which a holomorphic function vanishes is clopen in its domain; a nonconstant holomorphic function on a complex domain is an open map. Chartwise, for a holomorphic f:W→C on a surface domain W which is not constant on any nonempty open subset: the zero set is closed and locally finite, near each zero f factors as a power of a chart coordinate times a nonvanishing holomorphic factor, f is an open map, and the complement of the zero set is dense.

[F10]

The logarithm of the modulus (Logarithmic modulus is harmonic off its centre, Plane harmonicity is preserved by holomorphic and antiholomorphic changes of coordinate): w↦log⁡∣w−c∣ is harmonic on C∖{c}, and harmonicity is preserved by precomposition with a holomorphic map (in the chartwise sense of [F7]); hence for a holomorphic f on a surface domain the function log⁡∣f∣ is harmonic on the complement of the zero set of f and tends to −∞ at every zero of finite order.

[F11]

Punctured plane domains (Puncturing a connected open subset of Rn preserves path-connectedness for n≥2): if n≥2, Ω⊆Rn is nonempty, open and connected, and y∈Ω, then Ω∖{y} is nonempty, open, connected and path-connected; in particular a punctured open ball in C is connected.

[F12]

Connectedness, closure and compactness (Separation of a topological space, connected and disconnected spaces, clopen sets, and connected subsets, Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace, Interior, closure, boundary, exterior, derived set and isolated point in a topological space, Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right, In a Hausdorff space a point and a disjoint compact set, and two disjoint compact sets, have disjoint open neighbourhoods; hence every compact subset is closed, and in a compact Hausdorff space the compact subsets are exactly the closed ones, Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not, A continuous image of a connected space is connected, and connectedness is a topological property): a space is connected exactly when it has no separation into two disjoint nonempty open subsets; a subset of a space carries the subspace topology, in which the closed sets are the traces of closed sets; the closure of a finite union is the union of the closures and a set is dense exactly when its closure is the whole space; a closed subset of a compact space is compact and a compact subset of a Hausdorff space is closed; and continuous images of connected spaces are connected.

[F13]

Fundamental groups (Simply connected topological spaces, Based loops and the fundamental group, The fundamental group is a functor π1:Top∗→Grp, Loop classes form the group π1(X,x0) under concatenation): simply connected means nonempty and path-connected with π1 of cardinality one at every basepoint; a basepoint-preserving continuous map induces a group homomorphism of fundamental groups, functorially; and the identity element of π1 is the class of the constant loop.

[F14]

Plane simple connectivity (A plane domain with trivial fundamental group is homologically simply connected): if Ω⊆C is a complex domain in which every based loop represents the identity class in its fundamental group, then Ω is homologically simply connected.

[F15]

Riemann mapping theorem (Every proper homologically simply connected plane domain is conformally equivalent to the unit disc): under the Axiom of Choice, for every proper homologically simply connected complex domain Ω⊊C and every z0∈Ω there is a biholomorphic map f:Ω→D with f(z0)=0.

[F16]

Injectivity, biholomorphy and complex domains (An injective holomorphic map has no critical point and is biholomorphic onto its image, A complex domain is a nonempty connected open subset of C, Biholomorphic maps between complex domains): an injective holomorphic map on a complex domain has nowhere-zero derivative and is biholomorphic onto its open image, which is a complex domain; a complex domain is a nonempty open connected subset of C.

Proof

1.1F2F3given

The kernel at p0. By the given data and [F2], [F3], the envelope g0 is finite, strictly positive and harmonic on X∖{p0}. The compact case of [F3] is identically infinite, so the given finite envelope forces X to be noncompact. In the centred chart z:U→D at p0 there is a harmonic function h1 on U with g0=−log⁡∣z∣+h1 on U∖{p0}.

2.1F1F4step 1.1

The holomorphic map with ∣ϕ∣=e−g0. Apply [F4] with Y:=X, P:={p0}, u:=g0, m1:=1 and h1 as in step 1.1: there is a meromorphic function F:X→C^ with ∣F∣=e−g0 on X∖{p0}, with F=z G near p0 for a holomorphic G satisfying G(p0)≠0, and with no zeros or poles outside p0. Since the only local exponent is m1=1>0, the function F has no poles at all; taking values in C it is a holomorphic map ϕ:=F:X→C [F1], with a simple zero at p0 and no other zeros, and ∣ϕ(x)∣=e−g0(x)<1 for every x≠p0 by the strict positivity in step 1.1. In particular ϕ(p0)=0 and ϕ(X)⊆D.

3.1F1F8F9step 2.1

The normalised map at an arbitrary second point. Fix p1∈X∖{p0} and put a:=ϕ(p1), so a∈D∖{0} because p1≠p0 and p0 is the only zero of ϕ (step 2.1). By [F8] the map Φa(w):=w−a1−a‾ w is an automorphism of D, so ϕ1:=Φa∘ϕ:X→D is holomorphic with ∣ϕ1∣<1 on X [F1, F8]. Moreover ϕ1(p1)=0 and ϕ1(p0)=Φa(0)=−a≠0. The map ϕ1 is not constant on any nonempty open subset (such a constancy would make ϕ=Φa−1∘ϕ1 constant there, and then ϕ, being holomorphic on the connected surface X, would be constant by the clopenness in [F9], contradicting ϕ(p0)=0≠a=ϕ(p1)); hence [F9] makes its zero set Z1:=ϕ1−1(0)={x∈X:ϕ(x)=a} closed, and every point of Z1 has an open neighbourhood meeting Z1 only in that point, so that Z1 is locally finite.

4.1F2F6F7F9F10F12step 3.1algebra

Marshall's maximum-principle inequality. Let v∈Fp1(X) and ε>0, and put uε:=v+(1+ε)log⁡∣ϕ1∣ on X∖Z1; note that X∖Z1⊆X∖{p1} because ϕ1(p1)=0. We show uε≤0 on X∖Z1. (i) uε is subharmonic on X∖Z1: the restriction of v is subharmonic there, (1+ε)log⁡∣ϕ1∣ is harmonic on X∖Z1 by [F10] and [F7], and a nonnegative multiple of a harmonic function is subharmonic while sums of subharmonic functions are subharmonic [F7]. (ii) Let u^:=max⁡(uε,0) on X∖Z1 and u^:=0 on Z1. Near a point z∈Z1 with z≠p1, the function v is upper semicontinuous and finite at z, hence bounded above on a neighbourhood of z [F7], while log⁡∣ϕ1(x)∣→−∞ as x→z by [F10]; near z=p1 the unit pole condition v≤−log⁡∣w∣+C in a centred chart w at p1 [F2] and the factorisation ϕ1=wkG with k≥1 and G(p1)≠0 [F9] give uε≤(k(1+ε)−1)log⁡∣w∣+C′, which tends to −∞ because k(1+ε)>1. Hence uε<0, and so u^=0, on a neighbourhood of every point of Z1; consequently u^ is upper semicontinuous on X, and near every point of Z1 it is the constant 0, hence subharmonic there, so by the locality of subharmonicity [F6] the function u^ is subharmonic on X. (iii) The function u^ is nonnegative, and it vanishes on the nonempty open set X∖K, where K is a compact support of v [F2]; since X is noncompact by step 1.1, X∖K is nonempty. The upper semicontinuous u^ is bounded above on compact K: its open strict sublevels at positive integer thresholds cover K, so a finite subcover gives a finite upper bound; outside K it is zero. Let M:=sup⁡Xu^<∞. If M>0 then for every n≥0 the set Fn:={x∈K:u^(x)≥M−1/(n+1)} is a nonempty closed subset of K, these sets decrease, and compactness of K [F12] gives a point x∗∈⋂nFn (otherwise the increasing open sets K∖Fn would cover the compact K with no finite subcover), that is, u^(x∗)=M; the chartwise strong maximum principle [F7] applied on the connected surface X then makes u^≡M constant, contradicting u^=0 on X∖K≠∅. Hence M=0 and uε≤0 on X∖Z1. (iv) Fix p∈X∖Z1. Since uε(p)≤0 for every v∈Fp1(X) and every ε>0, the definition of the envelope as a supremum [F2] gives gX(p,p1)≤−(1+ε)log⁡∣ϕ1(p)∣; letting ε↓0 yields gX(p,p1)≤−log⁡∣ϕ1(p)∣<+∞.

4.2F1F11F12step 3.1

The complement of Z1 is connected. Z1 is closed and locally finite by step 3.1, and it has empty interior because every point of Z1 has a neighbourhood meeting Z1 only in that point; hence X∖Z1 is dense in X [F12]. Suppose X∖Z1=A⊔B with A,B nonempty disjoint open subsets of X∖Z1. Since Z1 is closed, A and B are open in X [F12]; since X∖Z1 is dense, X=A∪B‾=A‾∪B‾ [F12], and because X is connected [F1] the two nonempty closed sets A‾,B‾ cannot be disjoint, so there is z∈A‾∩B‾. The point z lies in Z1: it is not in A (else the open set A would meet B, as z∈B‾), and symmetrically not in B; so z∈Z1. Choose a chart ψ:W→C of X at z with ψ(W) an open ball and W∩Z1={z}, possible because Z1 is locally finite and charts can be shrunk [F1, F12]. Then W∖{z}=W∖Z1=(A∩W)⊔(B∩W), both parts are nonempty because z lies in the closure of both A and B, and both are open in W∖{z}; so W∖{z} would be disconnected. But ψ carries W∖{z} homeomorphically onto the punctured ball ψ(W)∖{ψ(z)}, which is connected by [F11]. This contradiction shows that no separation exists, so X∖Z1 is connected.

5.1F3F5step 4.1

Every pole has a finite kernel. The complement X∖Z1 is nonempty, because Z1 is locally finite and no neighbourhood of a point of a surface consists of a single point [F1, F12]; so step 4.1 exhibits a point where the envelope with pole p1 is finite. By the dichotomy of [F3] the envelope with pole p1 is then finite everywhere, so X admits a finite canonical Green kernel at p1; since p1∈X∖{p0} was arbitrary, this holds at every point of X. In particular, for every p1≠p0 both kernels gX(⋅,p0) and gX(⋅,p1) are finite, and [F5] gives the symmetry gX(p0,p1)=gX(p1,p0).

6.1F3F5F10step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1

The harmonic difference and its value at p0. Fix p1∈X∖{p0} and let Z1 and ϕ1 be as in step 3.1. By steps 4.1 and 5.1, h:=gX(⋅,p1)+log⁡∣ϕ1∣ is defined on X∖Z1, satisfies h≤0 there, and is harmonic there, because gX(⋅,p1) is harmonic on X∖{p1}⊇X∖Z1 [F3, step 5.1] and log⁡∣ϕ1∣ is harmonic on X∖Z1 [F10]. At p0∉Z1 one has ϕ1(p0)=−ϕ(p1), so log⁡∣ϕ1(p0)∣=log⁡∣ϕ(p1)∣=−g0(p1)=−gX(p1,p0) by step 2.1; with the symmetry of step 5.1, h(p0)=gX(p0,p1)−gX(p1,p0)=0.

7.1F7step 6.1step 4.2

h vanishes identically. The function h of step 6.1 is harmonic on the connected open set X∖Z1 (step 4.2), satisfies h≤0 there and h(p0)=0; so h attains its finite maximum at the interior point p0, and the chartwise strong maximum principle [F7] gives h≡0 on X∖Z1.

8.1F1F3F7step 3.1step 7.1

The zero set of ϕ1 is a single point. Suppose z∈Z1 with z≠p1. By step 3.1 there is an open neighbourhood N of z with N∩Z1={z}, and z is not a pole of gX(⋅,p1), so gX(⋅,p1) is continuous at z [F3, F7]; shrinking N within a chart we may assume ∣gX(x,p1)∣≤C on N for some C≥1. Since ϕ1 is continuous with ϕ1(z)=0 [F1], after shrinking N further we have ∣ϕ1(x)∣<e−2C for all x∈N, hence h(x)≤C−2C=−C<0 for every x∈N∖{z}, a set which is nonempty; but N∖{z}⊆X∖Z1, where h≡0 by step 7.1. This contradiction shows Z1={p1}.

9.1step 2.1step 3.1step 8.1

ϕ is injective. Let a,b∈X with ϕ(a)=ϕ(b). If ϕ(b)=0 then b=p0 and ϕ(a)=0 give a=p0, so a=b by step 2.1. Otherwise c:=ϕ(b)≠0, so b≠p0; apply the construction of step 3.1 with p1:=b, which gives ϕ1(a)=ϕ(a)−ϕ(b)1−ϕ(b)‾ϕ(a)=01−∣c∣2=0, that is, a∈Z1; step 8.1 then gives a=b. Hence ϕ is injective.

10.1F1F12F16step 2.1step 9.1

The image is a complex domain and ϕ is a biholomorphism onto it. Let Ω:=ϕ(X). For a point a∈X choose a centred chart za:Ua→D at a [F1]. The chart expression ϕ∘za−1:D→C is holomorphic and injective (step 9.1), so by [F16] it is biholomorphic onto its open image ϕ(Ua) and has nowhere-zero derivative; in particular ϕ(Ua) is open and the inverse of ϕ∣Ua is holomorphic. The sets Ua cover X, so Ω=⋃aϕ(Ua) is open; it is connected as a continuous image of the connected space X [F12], and nonempty, while Ω⊆D⊊C by step 2.1. Hence Ω is a complex domain [F16], and the bijection ϕ:X→Ω (step 9.1) has a holomorphic inverse, since holomorphy is a local condition [F1]; thus ϕ is a biholomorphism onto Ω.

11.1F13step 10.1

Every based loop of Ω is null as an element of the fundamental group. Let γ be a loop in Ω based at y0∈Ω, and put x0:=ϕ−1(y0) and γ~:=ϕ−1∘γ, continuous by step 10.1; then γ~ is a loop in X based at x0, and [γ~] is the identity element of π1(X,x0) because X is simply connected [F13]. By the functoriality of the fundamental group [F13], [γ]=[ϕ∘γ~]=ϕ∗[γ~]=ϕ∗(identity)=identity in π1(Ω,y0); since γ was an arbitrary based loop, every based loop of Ω represents the identity class.

12.1F14step 10.1step 11.1

The image is homologically simply connected. By step 10.1, Ω is a complex domain and by step 11.1 every based loop of Ω represents the identity class in its fundamental group; hence Ω is homologically simply connected by [F14].

13.1A1F15F16step 10.1step 12.1∎

Riemann mapping and conclusion. The domain Ω⊊C is proper and homologically simply connected by steps 10.1 and 12.1, so the Riemann mapping theorem [F15] provides a biholomorphic map f:Ω→D normalised at z0:=ϕ(p0). The composite f∘ϕ:X→D is then bijective and holomorphic with holomorphic inverse, being a composite of biholomorphisms [F1, F16]; in other words X is biholomorphic to the unit disc. The Axiom of Choice [A1] is used exactly through [F15] and through the Countable Choice consumed by the envelope suppliers [F3] in steps 1.1, 4.1 and 5.1; the remaining selections are finite.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

163 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources