Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Harmonic conjugates and integral logarithmic-pole monodromy on surfaces

Statement

Let X be a simply connected Riemann surface (Riemann surfaces and holomorphic atlases, Simply connected topological spaces).

  1. Every harmonic function u:X→R (Chartwise harmonic and subharmonic functions on a Riemann surface) has a harmonic conjugate on X (Harmonic conjugates): there is a harmonic v:X→R such that u+iv is holomorphic in every chart of X.

  2. Let P={p1,…,pn}⊆X be finite and let u:X∖P→R be harmonic. Assume that for every j there are a holomorphic chart (Uj,zj) centred at pj, so zj(pj)=0, with the domains Uj pairwise disjoint, an integer mj∈Z and a harmonic function hj on Uj with u=−mjlog⁡∣zj∣+hjon Uj∖{pj}. Then u has a locally defined harmonic conjugate v on X∖P (defined on every simply connected chart domain and unique there up to an additive constant), and w:=u+iv has all its periods in 2πiZ: the function F:=exp⁡(−w) is a single-valued holomorphic function F:X∖P→C× with ∣F∣=e−u, and it is the restriction of a meromorphic function F:X→C^ (Holomorphic maps and meromorphic functions on Riemann surfaces) which in the chart zj satisfies F=zjmjGj with Gj holomorphic at 0 and Gj(0)≠0. Consequently F has a zero of order mj at pj when mj>0, a pole of order −mj at pj when mj<0, is holomorphic and nonzero at pj when mj=0, and has no zeros or poles outside P.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A simply connected Riemann surface X; a harmonic u either on X or on X∖P with the logarithmic expansions of part 2.

[F1]

Chartwise harmonicity, chartwise harmonic conjugates and the convention that u+iv is holomorphic in every chart are those of Chartwise harmonic and subharmonic functions on a Riemann surface; in the plane the notion agrees with Plane harmonic functions and Harmonic conjugates. Plane harmonic functions are C2 with uxx+uyy=0, so the field (−uy,ux) has continuous first partials and −uyy=uxx holds (Plane harmonic functions).

[F2]

Local potentials: every point of a plane domain on which u is harmonic has a disc on which u is the real part of a holomorphic function (Every plane harmonic function is locally the real part of a holomorphic function). Two harmonic conjugates of the same harmonic function on a connected plane domain differ by a real constant (Two harmonic conjugates differ by a real constant); comparing the chart expressions of two surface-conjugates of u on a connected surface domain therefore shows that their difference is locally constant, hence constant there.

[F3]

A C1 field on a star-shaped plane domain which is closed is conservative and has a potential, and every closed piecewise-C1 path in such a domain has zero line integral against it (On a star-shaped open domain, closed, exact, conservative, path-independent, and zero-loop are equivalent). In particular (−uy,ux) has a potential on every plane disc, and the conjugate potential is holomorphic together with its harmonic partner by the Cauchy-Riemann equations (Complex differentiability is equivalent to real total differentiability together with a complex-linear derivative, with ∂zˉf=0, or with the Cauchy–Riemann equations).

[F4]

Path calculus: concatenation α∗β of composable paths, reversal αˉ, the constant path and path homotopy relative to endpoints are those of Paths, path-connected spaces and path components, Based loops and the fundamental group and Homotopies of continuous maps, homotopies relative to a subspace, and path homotopies relative to the endpoints; products of loop classes are well defined and form a group, [α]−1=[αˉ], and the explicit piecewise-affine pasting formulas of that proof are continuous by Continuity may be checked on any open cover, and on any finite closed cover; composites of continuous maps are continuous (Loop classes form the group π1(X,x0) under concatenation). The same formulas give, for a path λ:x→y: λˉ∗λ is homotopic rel endpoints to the constant path at y, and λ∗λˉ to the constant path at x; (1−t)s+tϕ(s) for ϕ continuous with ϕ(0)=0, ϕ(1)=1 gives reparametrisation homotopies; and concatenation of a fixed path with homotopic paths is again a homotopy rel endpoints (Homotopies of continuous maps, homotopies relative to a subspace, and path homotopies relative to the endpoints, Continuity may be checked on any open cover, and on any finite closed cover; composites of continuous maps are continuous).

[F5]

Fundamental groups: π1 of a pointed space, transport of loop classes along paths by σ↦[λ∗σ∗λˉ], and functoriality of based maps are as in Based loops and the fundamental group and Induced fundamental-group maps are well defined, functorial and invariant under based homotopy. A Euclidean disc is simply connected (Every nonempty convex subset of Rn is simply connected).

[F6]

Covering spaces: existence of a based connected covering with prescribed subgroup for a nonempty, path-connected, locally path-connected, semilocally simply connected base (Every subgroup acts on the universal cover with a connected quotient covering that realizes it, Semilocally simply connected spaces with explicit basepoint convention); restrictions of coverings to open subspaces are coverings (Covering spaces are stable under restriction, finite products, and pullback); the based lifting criterion (Lifting criterion for maps from path-connected locally path-connected spaces); unique path lifting (Existence and uniqueness of path lifts through a covering map); sheets equal the subgroup index (For a nonempty path-connected total space, a covering fibre is in bijection with the right cosets of the induced fundamental-group subgroup); the number of sheets is locally constant (The cardinality of a covering fibre is locally constant and is constant on a connected base); coverings are local homeomorphisms with discrete fibres (Covering maps are surjective local homeomorphisms with discrete fibres, Covering maps, evenly covered neighbourhoods, fibres, sheets, and trivial coverings); a covering of a locally path-connected base is locally path-connected iff its total space is (Local path-connectedness lifts and descends along covering maps); and every connected covering of a locally path-connected simply connected space is one-sheeted (A connected covering of a locally path-connected simply connected space is one-sheeted and trivial).

[F8]

The punctured complex plane has π1(C×,e0)≅Z and the standard positive circle loop generates, with winding number one classifying it (The punctured plane has fundamental group Z, while punctured Rn is simply connected for n≥3, Winding number identifies the fundamental group of C times with the integers).

[F9]

Logarithm, orders and singularities: the principal logarithm of Complex logarithms, the principal logarithm, and principal and multivalued complex powers is holomorphic on the slit plane (The principal logarithm is the normalised holomorphic branch on the slit plane). Its rotated branches Log⁡(e−iαz)+iα are holomorphic on rotated slit planes by The chain rule for complex derivatives; integer powers z↦zm are holomorphic and nonzero on C× by repeated products and reciprocals (Linearity, product, reciprocal, and quotient rules for complex derivatives); a holomorphic function on a punctured disc which is bounded near the centre extends holomorphically across it (Characterizations of removable singularities, Isolated singularities: removable, poles, and essential singularities); orders of zeros are those of The order of a zero of a holomorphic function; and holomorphy of a map to C^ is tested in the charts ϕ0,ϕ∞, so a chart expression with a pole of finite order at the centre extends holomorphically to a value ∞ (Holomorphic maps and meromorphic functions on Riemann surfaces).

[F10]

The normal closure ⟨ ⁣⟨S⟩ ⁣⟩G is the smallest normal subgroup of G containing S, so it consists of finite products of conjugates of elements of S and their inverses (The normal closure of a subset of a group).

Given: A simply connected Riemann surface X, and either a harmonic u:X→R or a finite P with a harmonic u:X∖P→R carrying the logarithmic expansions of the statement.

Proof technique: direct.

Proof

1.1F1F2construct

Local conjugates exist on small chart discs. Let W⊆X be open and u harmonic on W. For every x∈W choose a chart φ:U→C of X with x∈U; then uφ is harmonic on the open set φ(U∩W) by [F1]. By [F2] there is a radius r>0 with D(φ(x),r)⊆φ(U∩W) and a holomorphic H on that disc with Re⁡H=uφ. Then vD:=Im⁡H∘φ is defined and harmonic on the connected chart disc D:=φ−1(D(φ(x),r))⊆W, and u+ivD is holomorphic in the chart φ; call such a D a conjugate disc for u.

1.2F5F6F7contradiction

The punctured surface is a legitimate base for covering theory. Let W:=X∖P with P finite, and suppose u is harmonic on W with the expansions of part 2. Since X is a connected topological surface, it is locally path-connected and path-connected [F7]. The set W is nonempty (a Riemann surface is nonempty and P is finite, so X∖P≠∅). W is locally path-connected as an open subset of a locally path-connected space [F7]. W is connected: suppose W=A⊔B with A,B open in W and nonempty, so A,B are open in X as well; choose for each pj a chart disc Ej with Ej∩P={pj}. Each punctured disc Ej∖{pj} is connected [F7], and it is contained in W=A⊔B, so it lies entirely in A or entirely in B. Put A∗:=A∪{pj:Ej∖{pj}⊆A},B∗:=B∪{pj:Ej∖{pj}⊆B}. Then A∗∪B∗=X, because every point of W lies in A or in B and every pj lies in A∗ or in B∗, and A∗∩B∗=∅: the two open sets A,B are disjoint, a point pj∈A∗∩B∗ would force the nonempty set Ej∖{pj} to lie in both A and B, and A∩{pj:Ej∖{pj}⊆B}=∅ because that pj is not in W. Each of A∗,B∗ is open in X: indeed A∗=A∪⋃{Ej:Ej∖{pj}⊆A} is a union of open subsets of X, since for such j one has Ej⊆A∪{pj}⊆A∗, and similarly for B∗. Finally A⊆A∗ and B⊆B∗ are nonempty. This exhibits X as a disjoint union of two nonempty open sets, contradicting the connectedness of X; hence W is connected, and being locally path-connected it is path-connected [F7]. Finally W is semilocally simply connected: every point of W has a chart disc neighbourhood contained in W with simply connected image [F5], which witnesses the condition [F6].

2.1step 1.1F1F2algebra

Conjugates on a connected overlap differ by a constant. If D,D′ are conjugate discs and vD,vD′ the conjugates from step 1.1, then vD−vD′ is constant on every connected component of D∩D′: on a component C, chart expressions of u+ivD and u+ivD′ are holomorphic, so their difference divided by i is a holomorphic function on an open subset of C with values in R, hence constant on each chart disc, and these local constants agree on overlaps of chart discs because a locally constant function on the connected set C is constant.

2.2step 1.2F4F10construct

Meridian loops and their normal closure. Fix x0∈W. For each j choose Rj>0 with D(0,Rj)‾⊆zj(Uj) and put Vj:=zj−1(D(0,Rj)). These are pairwise disjoint coordinate discs; the prescribed hj restricts harmonically to Vj. Choose 0<rj<Rj/2, put yj:=zj−1(rj), and choose a path λj in W from x0 to yj [step 1.2]. Let μj(t):=zj−1(rje2πit) be the positively oriented meridian based at yj. Set cj:=[λj∗μj∗λˉj]∈π1(W,x0),N:=⟨ ⁣⟨c1,…,cn⟩ ⁣⟩π1(W,x0).

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F2F7algebra

The period integral of a continuous path. Let γ:[a,b]→W be a continuous path and let D be the family of all conjugate discs for u. The sets γ−1(D), D∈D, form an open cover of the compact metric space [a,b] [F7], so by the Lebesgue number lemma [F7] there are a=t0<t1<⋯<tN=b such that each γ([tk−1,tk]) lies in some conjugate disc Dk with conjugate vk. Define ∫γβ:=∑k=1N(vk(γ(tk))−vk(γ(tk−1)))∈R. This is independent of the choice of the vk for the given partition, because by step 2.1 any two conjugates on Dk and Dk′ differ by a constant on the connected component of the overlap containing the connected set γ([tk−1,tk]), and that constant cancels in the difference. It is independent of the partition: two admissible data admit a common refinement, the sum over a refinement using the same conjugates as before telescopes to the coarse sum, and two different refinements are compared by step 2.1 on each small interval.

3.2step 2.2F5F8

π1 of the punctured chart disc. For each j, the composition of the chart zj with an explicit radial homeomorphism C×→D(0,Rj)∖{0}, w↦Rjw/(1+∣w∣), identifies Vj∖{pj} homeomorphically with C×, and the circle loop μj corresponds to a loop of winding number one; by functoriality of π1 under homeomorphisms and [F8], π1(Vj∖{pj},yj) is infinite cyclic and generated by [μj] (regarded there), so its image under the inclusion-induced map is the cyclic subgroup generated by the class of μj as a loop in W.

3.3step 2.2F6F7

The prescribed covering. By step 1.2 the space W satisfies the hypotheses of the subgroup construction [F6], so there is a based connected covering p:(E,e0)⟶(W,x0),p∗π1(E,e0)=N. The total space E is path-connected: E is connected by construction, it is locally path-connected because W is and [F6], and connected locally path-connected spaces are path-connected [F7].

4.1step 3.1F4algebra

Elementary properties of the integral. For composable continuous paths α,β one has ∫α∗ββ=∫αβ+∫ββ, for the reversal ∫αˉβ=−∫αβ, and for a constant path the integral is 0; these are immediate from the definition of step 3.1 applied to partitions adapted to the concatenation (the value of the constant-path integral is v(x)−v(x)=0). Consequently, for a path λ from x to y and a loop σ at y, one has ∫λ∗σ∗λˉβ=∫σβ.

4.2step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1F2F7algebra

Homotopy invariance. Let γ,γ′:[a,b]→W have the same endpoints and let H:[a,b]×[0,1]→W be a homotopy relative to the endpoints joining them. Then ∫γβ=∫γ′β. Indeed, the sets H−1(D) over the conjugate discs cover the compact metric square; by [F7] choose a grid a=s0<⋯<sM=b, 0=r0<⋯<rR=1 so fine that each H(Rkl) lies in one conjugate disc Dkl (use uniform continuity of H and a Lebesgue number). For every grid edge E choose a rectangle Rkl containing it and define inc⁡(E) as the difference of vDkl at the endpoints of E, the edge oriented in the increasing first coordinate for horizontal edges and in the increasing second coordinate for vertical edges. Summing over the four boundary edges of a single rectangle Rkl telescopes to 0 because one and the same vDkl is evaluated at the images of the four corners around the closed rectangle. Summing over all rectangles, interior edges occur twice with opposite orientations, and the two contributions agree by step 2.1 applied to the connected image of the edge; hence 0=∑E boundaryinc⁡(E). The two vertical edges contribute 0, since H fixes the endpoints and the corresponding values are equal, and the bottom and top edges contribute ∫γβ and −∫γ′β. Thus the integrals are equal.

5.1step 4.1step 4.2F4F5

The period homomorphism and its transport. By steps 4.1 and 4.2, for every x∈W the formula φx([γ]):=∫γβ is a well-defined group homomorphism π1(W,x)→(R,+): it is well defined on classes by step 4.2, additive by step 4.1, and φx([cx])=0. For a path λ from x to y and a loop σ at y one has φx([λ∗σ∗λˉ])=φy([σ]) by step 4.1.

5.2step 4.1step 4.2F4F5

Simply connected case: all periods vanish. Assume now that u is harmonic on all of X and that X is simply connected. Fix x0∈X. For every loop γ at x0 the class [γ] is the identity of π1(X,x0), since that group has exactly one element; hence γ is path-homotopic rel endpoints to the constant loop at x0 [F4], so by step 4.2 and step 4.1, φx0([γ])=0.

5.3step 2.2step 3.2step 3.3F4F6

A dictionary for the restricted covering. Fix j and let λj be the chosen path from x0 to yj. Let λ~j be the unique lift of λj starting at e0 and put ej:=λ~j(1)∈p−1(yj) [F6]. Let Φj:π1(W,yj)→π1(W,x0),Φj([σ]):=[λj∗σ∗λˉj] be transport of classes along λj; by [F4] and step 4.1 it is a well-defined group isomorphism, and Φj([μj])=cj∈N. I claim p∗π1(E,ej)=Φj−1(N). For the inclusion ⊆, let β be a loop in E at ej; then λ~j∗β∗λ~ˉj is a loop in E at e0 whose projection is, as a path, the concatenation λj∗(p∘β)∗λˉj; hence Φj(p∗[β])=p∗[λ~j∗β∗λ~ˉj]∈N. For the reverse inclusion, let a∈π1(W,yj) with Φj(a)∈N=p∗π1(E,e0) and choose a loop β in E at e0 with p∗[β]=Φj(a); then γ:=λ~ˉj∗β∗λ~j is a loop in E at ej whose projection is the loop λˉj∗ρ∗λj, where ρ is a representative of Φj(a)=[λj∗σ∗λˉj] for a representative σ of a. By the cancellation and associativity identities of [F4] the loop λˉj∗ρ∗λj represents [σ]=a; hence p∗[γ]=a and a∈p∗π1(E,ej). Therefore [μj]∈p∗π1(E,ej), because Φj([μj])=cj∈N.

5.4step 3.1step 4.1step 2.2F3F9algebra

Local computation of the periods. Fix j and write Dj for the disc ∣zj∣<rj′ with rj′ chosen so that μj runs along ∣zj∣=rj<rj′ and Dj⊆Vj. On the disc Dj the function hj is harmonic, and the field (−∂yhj,∂xhj) is closed; by [F3] it has a potential Hj on the disc ∣zj∣<rj′ with ∇Hj=(−∂yhj,∂xhj) in the chart coordinates, and hj+iHj is holomorphic there. On the slit disc S:=Dj∖(−∞,0] the principal logarithm of zj is holomorphic [F9], so V:=−mjarg⁡zj+Hj is a harmonic conjugate of u on S: indeed −mjlog⁡zj+hj+iHj is holomorphic on S with real part −mjlog⁡∣zj∣+hj=u. Splitting the circle loop μj into finitely many arcs of angular width less than π and applying the definition of the integral of step 3.1 with rotated logarithm branches from [F9] with continuous argument along each arc, the Hj-part telescopes to zero around the closed circle (all increments are those of the single-valued harmonic conjugate Hj along arcs inside Dj, so the total change is 0), while the angular parts add to the total change 2π of the argument around the positively oriented circle. Hence ∫μjβ=−2πmj. By step 4.1 and step 2.2, φx0(cj)=∫μjβ=−2πmj.

6.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.2F4construct

A global conjugate by path integration. X is path-connected because it is simply connected [F5]. Define, for x∈X, v(x):=∫σβfor any path σ in X from x0 to x. This is well defined: two paths σ,σ′ from x0 to x give ∫σβ−∫σ′β=∫σ∗σˉ′β=0 by steps 4.1 and 5.2, since σ∗σˉ′ is a loop at x0.

6.2step 2.2step 3.2step 5.3F6F7

Each component over a punctured disc is one-sheeted. Let Dj×:=Vj∖{pj} and restrict p over this open set. By step 3.2 its fundamental group is generated by the meridian [μj], whose image in π1(W,yj) lies in p∗π1(E,ej) by step 5.3. The lifting criterion [F6] gives a section of the restricted covering through ej; the component Z containing ej therefore has a surjective map on fundamental groups and is one-sheeted by the sheet-index formula [F6]. Now let e be any other point above yj. Choose a path in the connected space E from ej to e, and write g for the class of its projected loop at yj. Path conjugation identifies p∗π1(E,e) with g−1p∗π1(E,ej)g. By step 5.3 the latter subgroup is Φj−1(N), which is normal because N is a normal closure; hence [μj] also lies in p∗π1(E,e). The same section and sheet-index argument makes the component through e one-sheeted. Every component of a covering over the connected, locally path-connected disc Dj× contains a point above yj, so every component maps homeomorphically onto Dj×. The total preimage may have several components.

7.1step 1.1step 6.1F1F2

v is a global harmonic conjugate. Let x∈X, let D∋x be a conjugate disc with conjugate vD, and let y∈D. Choose a path σ from x0 to x and a path τ inside D from x to y; then, using step 3.1 with the single conjugate vD on the second piece, v(y)=∫σ∗τβ=v(x)+(vD(y)−vD(x)). Hence v=vD+constant on D; so v is harmonic on D and u+iv is holomorphic in the coordinate of D, up to the additive imaginary constant. As the conjugate discs cover X, v is a harmonic conjugate of u on X, and part 1 of the statement follows.

7.2step 3.3step 6.2F6

Extending the covering across the punctures. For each j and each component C of p−1(Dj×), the homeomorphism p∣C:C→Dj× extends to a homeomorphism C∪{cC}→Vj of the one-point extensions, sending the new point cC to pj. Form E′:=E∪{cC} over all j and components C, with the topology generated by open sets of E and sets {cC}∪(p∣C)−1(zj−1(D(0,t))∖{pj}), for 0<t<Rj, and extend p to p′:E′→X by p′(cC):=pj. Then p′ is a covering map: over W it restricts to the covering p, and over each Vj the preimage is the disjoint union of the spaces C∪{cC}≅Vj, each mapping homeomorphically onto Vj, so the local triviality conditions hold at interior points and at the added points. Moreover E′ is connected: E is connected by step 3.3, and each added point cC lies in the closure of C∖{cC}⊆E, so E′ is the union of E with points in its closure.

8.1step 2.2step 3.3step 7.2F6F10

Conclusion: the meridians generate. The map p′:E′→X is a connected covering of the simply connected locally path-connected space X, hence is one-sheeted and an isomorphism [F6]. Therefore p:E→W is one-sheeted, so p∗:π1(E,e0)→π1(W,x0) is an isomorphism, and its image is N; hence π1(W,x0)=N=⟨ ⁣⟨c1,…,cn⟩ ⁣⟩. In particular every element of π1(W,x0) is a finite product of conjugates of the classes cj±1 [F10].

9.1step 5.1step 8.1step 5.4F10algebra

All periods are integral multiples of 2π. By step 8.1 every class in π1(W,x0) is a finite product of conjugates of the cj±1; since φx0 is a homomorphism [step 5.1] and φx0(g cj g−1)=φx0(cj)=−2πmj for every g, while φx0(cj−1)=2πmj, every period φx0([γ]) lies in 2πZ.

10.1step 3.1step 9.1construct

Construction of F. Define, for x∈W, F(x):=e−u(x)exp⁡(−i∫σβ)for any path σ in W from x0 to x. This is well defined: two paths σ,σ′ differ by a loop at x0 and the two exponents differ by an element of 2πZ by step 9.1, so the exponentials agree.

11.1step 1.1step 10.1F1algebra

F is holomorphic and nonvanishing with ∣F∣=e−u. On a conjugate disc D containing a point x, and for y∈D, the path σ from x0 to x followed by a path in D from x to y computes ∫β=∫σβ+(vD(y)−vD(x)), so F(y)=F(x) e−(u(y)+ivD(y))e u(x)+ivD(x) on D. Since u+ivD is holomorphic in the chart of D, the right-hand side exhibits F as a holomorphic function on D with F(y)≠0; as the conjugate discs cover W, F is holomorphic on W and vanishes nowhere. Taking moduli gives ∣F(y)∣=e−u(y)>0 everywhere on W.

12.1step 11.1F9algebra

Local form at each puncture. Fix j. On W define G:=zj−mjF near pj, where zj−mj is the holomorphic nonvanishing power function of [F9] on the punctured chart; then G is holomorphic on Dj∖{pj}. To compute its size, note that ∣F∣=e−u=emjlog⁡∣zj∣−hj=∣zj∣mje−hj by step 11.1 and the expansion of u; hence ∣G∣=e−hj on Dj∖{pj}, and hj is continuous on the disc Dj with pj in its interior, so G is bounded near pj. By the removable-singularity characterizations [F9], G extends holomorphically over pj, with ∣G(pj)∣=lim⁡∣zj∣→0e−hj=e−hj(pj)>0. Writing Gj for the extension gives F=zjmjGjnear pj,Gj holomorphic at 0, Gj(0)≠0.

13.1step 12.1F9

The extension is meromorphic with the asserted divisor. By step 12.1, at each puncture the chart expression of F is either holomorphic at the centre (if mj≥0, with a zero of order exactly mj when mj>0 and a nonzero value when mj=0) or has a pole of order −mj there when mj<0; in the latter case the reciprocal chart expression is holomorphic at the centre with value 0, which is exactly the chart condition for holomorphy of a map X→C^ in the chart ϕ∞ [F9]. Hence F extends to a holomorphic map F:X→C^, and it is not the constant map ∞ because F(W)⊆C× by step 11.1; so F is meromorphic [F9]. Orders are those of The order of a zero of a holomorphic function, and the pole order is read off from the reciprocal as in Isolated singularities: removable, poles, and essential singularities.

14.1step 7.1step 11.1step 13.1∎

No other zeros or poles. On W=X∖P the modulus ∣F∣=e−u is finite and strictly positive by step 11.1, so F has neither zeros nor poles in W; together with step 13.1 the zeros and poles of F are exactly the points pj with mj≠0, with the orders ∣mj∣ and the signs described. This completes the proof of part 2, and part 1 was proved in step 7.1.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

185 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources