Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Radial volume scattering separates into matched partial-wave boundary problems

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and Dependent Choice. Let R>0, k>0, and Q∈C([0,R];C). Set q(x)=Q(∣x∣) on BR and q(x)=0 outside BR. Choose for every ℓ an orthonormal basis Yℓm of Hℓ. Suppose uinc is a classical free Helmholtz field on all of R3, and u=uinc+V satisfies the volume-potential equation V(x)=∫BRGk(x−y)q(y)u(y)dy. Assume u is continuous on B‾R, piecewise C2 on either side of ∣x∣=R, and u and its radial derivative are continuous across that interface. For every spherical harmonic Yℓm assume its coefficient wℓm(r):=r∫S2u(rω)Yℓm(ω)‾dσ(ω) satisfies the regular-origin condition wℓm(r)=O(rℓ+1) as r↓0. Explicitly assume the incident regular-mode form: for every ℓ,m there is αℓm∈C such that r∫S2uinc(rω)Yℓm(ω)‾dσ(ω)=αℓmrjℓ(kr) for r>0. The outgoing radiation condition is lim⁡r→∞sup⁡ω∈S2∣r(∂rV(rω)−ikV(rω))∣=0. Then each reduced mode satisfies wℓm′′(r)+(k2+Q(r)−ℓ(ℓ+1)r2)wℓm(r)=0(0<r<R), is regular at 0, and has for r>R the form wℓm(r)=αℓmrjℓ(kr)+βℓmrhℓ(1)(kr). The interior and exterior values and first derivatives agree at R. This is a conditional mode reduction and matching statement; it asserts neither existence nor uniqueness of the total field.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The radial contrast, classical field on R3, regular-origin hypothesis for the total modes, explicit incident regular-mode forms, and outgoing hypothesis in the Statement.

[F1]

The three-dimensional volume integral scattering model and The outgoing three-dimensional Helmholtz kernel is a fundamental solution: the volume-potential equation implies (−Δ−k2)(u−uinc)=qu distributionally.

[F2]

Spherical harmonics and partial-wave conventions in three dimensions: ΔS2Yℓm=−ℓ(ℓ+1)Yℓm.

[F3]

Spherical harmonics form a complete basis with the addition formula: under Countable Choice and Dependent Choice, the degree spaces are orthogonal and complete in L2(S2).

[F4]

Spherical Bessel and outgoing Hankel recurrences solve the radial Helmholtz equation: jℓ and hℓ(1) solve the free radial equation, have nonzero Wronskian, and respectively have regular and outgoing asymptotics.

Proof

Given: The data in the Statement.

1.1F1F2algebra

The boundedness of Q and continuity of u on the compact ball imply qu∈L1(BR) with bounded support, so [F1] applies. Since uinc solves (−Δ−k2)uinc=0, [F1] gives Δu+(k2+Q(r))u=0 in 0<r<R. For fixed r, multiply the polar Laplacian identity by Yℓm‾, integrate over S2, and integrate the angular Laplacian by parts; the periodic azimuthal boundary terms cancel and the polar boundary terms vanish with the factor sin⁡θ. By [F2], the angular term is −ℓ(ℓ+1) times the mode coefficient aℓm(r):=wℓm(r)/r. Hence aℓm′′+2raℓm′+(k2+Q(r)−ℓ(ℓ+1)r2)aℓm=0. Substitution of w=ra yields the asserted reduced ODE.

1.2givenalgebra

The stated origin condition is precisely the regular branch condition for this reduced mode and is retained as a hypothesis, so no singular solution is admitted. Because u and its first derivatives are continuous across r=R, integration against the fixed smooth harmonic gives continuity of wℓm and wℓm′ there.

1.3F1F4given

Outside BR, the scattered field V solves the free Helmholtz equation by [F1]. Its angular coefficient vℓm(r)=∫S2V(rω)Yℓm(ω)‾dσ solves the free radial equation, whose independent solutions are jℓ(kr) and hℓ(1)(kr) by the nonzero Wronskian in [F4]; write vℓm=ajℓ(kr)+bhℓ(1)(kr). The uniform radiation condition, integrated against the bounded Yℓm, gives r(vℓm′−ikvℓm)→0. Put ϑ=kr−ℓπ/2 and c=(−i)ℓ+1. The derivative recurrence in [F4] for ℓ≥1, and direct differentiation of the base functions for ℓ=0, give jℓ′(z)=cos⁡(z−ℓπ/2)/z+O(z−2) and (hℓ(1))′(z)=iceiz/z+O(z−2), so r(∂r−ik)jℓ(kr)=e−iϑ+O(r−1) while r(∂r−ik)hℓ(1)(kr)=O(r−1). Thus the radiation limit forces a=0, and the scattered mode is βℓmhℓ(1)(kr). Adding the stipulated incident mode gives the exterior expression in the Statement.

2.1F3step 1.2step 1.3∎

The interior/exterior continuity of the total mode and its radial derivative from step 1.2 gives the two matching equalities at R. Completeness in [F3] makes these modal statements the corresponding partial-wave decomposition, without asserting that the mode equations alone solve the full inverse or uniqueness problem.

Numerical interface

For a fixed finite set of orders and a positive matching radius, Soundness and eventual absolute precision for spherical Bessel enclosures supplies certified scaled values and argument derivatives of jℓ and outgoing hℓ(1) on positive real argument enclosures. Scaled spherical Bessel evaluation on positive real arguments also permits requesting their unscaled counterparts. At z=kR>0, the exterior matching columns are Rjℓ(z) and Rhℓ(1)(z), with radial derivatives jℓ(z)+zjℓ′(z) and hℓ(1)(z)+z(hℓ(1))′(z). These identities follow by the product and chain rules. Thus the supplied first argument derivatives suffice, including at ℓ=0.

The real-argument interface does not restrict the theorem's complex contrast Q: Q enters the interior ODE while the exterior free wave number k remains positive real. No evaluation at a complex wave number is used here. Certified exterior matching columns do not certify integration of the interior ODE, solvability of the complete matching system, total-field uniqueness, or the angular cutoff. Those claims retain their separate hypotheses and proofs. The mathematical mode-reduction statement above remains valid independently of whether numerical parameter enclosures have been provided.

For a numerical evaluation of these columns, supplied terminating positive-real parameter interfaces for k and R induce an argument interface for kR. On a width request 2−n, successively request both parameter boxes at indices q=n,n+1,…, skip until both lower endpoints are positive, multiply their dyadic intervals exactly, and stop when the product width is at most 2−n. Each call terminates by hypothesis; positivity holds eventually because k,R>0. The parameter boxes are eventually bounded, and the product-width bound width⁡(XY)≤sup⁡∣X∣width⁡(Y)+sup⁡∣Y∣width⁡(X) tends to zero. Thus the scan terminates for every requested n and retains the exact, generally non-dyadic product. The same interval operations propagate the factors R and z=kR in the displayed matching columns. This numerical representation condition does not restrict the theorem's exact real parameters.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

82 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources