Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Quasilinear Characteristics and Cauchy Kovalevskaya — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These computations show the two distinct characteristic boundaries: smooth lifting can outlive an inverse-projection graph, and a fully nonlinear Cauchy problem can lose uniqueness when its rank condition fails. The final examples also distinguish analytic normal-form hypotheses from merely smooth transport solutions.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedaudited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Semilinear characteristics with logistic growth

Example

Let g:RR be C1. For ut+ux=u(1u) and u(0,x)=g(x), the characteristic formula is

u(t,x)=g(xt)et1+g(xt)(et1),

on the open set where 1+g(xt)(et1)>0. For each fixed label ξ=xt, this is the time interval containing zero before any pole.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A C1 datum g:RR and a point (t,x) where the displayed denominator is positive.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The projected characteristics in the independent-variable plane are X(t,ξ)=(t,ξ+t). Thus their spatial component is ξ+t, so ξ=xt, and the Jacobian of (t,ξ)(t,ξ+t) is 1.

givenalgebra
2.1

Along one such curve, z=z(1z) and z(0)=g(ξ); put q=g(ξ) and D(t)=1+q(et1). On D(t)>0, direct differentiation gives z=qet/D and z=qet(1q)/D2=z(1z), with z(0)=q. This includes q=0 and q=1 without division by either. Since D(0)=1 and D(t)=qet has constant sign, {t:D(t)>0} is exactly the interval containing zero on which the denominator is nonzero.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Substitute ξ=xt to obtain the formula, and characteristic reconstruction verifies the PDE on its stated domain.

step 2.1given
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Rarefying inviscid Burgers data

Example

For u0(ξ)=ξ, X=(1+t)ξ, so for t0 the solution is u(t,x)=x/(1+t). The fan expands and has no forward caustic.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Burgers characteristic formula with u0(ξ)=ξ and t0.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The formula gives X=ξ+tξ=(1+t)ξ and Xξ=1+t>0.

givenalgebra
2.1

Inverting gives ξ=x/(1+t), while u(t,X)=u0(ξ)=ξ; hence u(t,x)=x/(1+t).

step 1.1algebra
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Inviscid Burgers gradient catastrophe

Example

For u0(ξ)=tanhξ, the map is X=ξttanhξ. Its first crossing is t=1 at ξ=0, and the slope there tends to .

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Burgers formula and u0(ξ)=sech2ξ.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Xξ=1tsech2ξ, which first vanishes at t=1, ξ=0, since 0<sech2ξ1.

givenalgebra
2.1

The Riccati formula gives ux(t,X(t,0))=1/(1t), which tends to as t1.

step 1.1givenalgebra
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Quasilinear characteristics can cross before the lifted ODE blows up

Statement refuted

If the lifted characteristic ODE continues, then the quasilinear PDE remains a single-valued classical graph.

Counterexample

Given: Burgers data u0(ξ)=tanhξ.

Proof technique: direct.

1.1

The lifted characteristic is Z(t,ξ)=tanhξ and X(t,ξ)=ξttanhξ, both defined for every t0.

givenalgebra
2.1

Yet Xξ(1,0)=0, so the projected map has a caustic at t=1.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Thus the lifted ODE persists while inverse projection to a graph fails, refuting the statement.

step 2.1given
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Clairaut complete integral and its nondegenerate stationary envelope

Example

For u=xux+(ux)2, S(x;a)=ax+a2 is a complete integral. Its stationary envelope is u=x2/4.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The equation and the family S(x;a)=ax+a2.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Sx=a, so xSx+(Sx)2=ax+a2=S; thus S is a complete integral.

givenalgebra
1.2

Sa=x+2a=0 gives a=x/2, and Saa=2 is invertible.

givenalgebra
2.1

Substitution gives u=S(x,x/2)=x2/4; the nondegenerate-envelope lemma makes it a classical solution.

step 1.1step 1.2algebra
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Eikonal cones are not classical at the vertex

Example

For n1, on Rn the function u(x)=x solves Du=1 away from x=0, but is not a classical solution at its vertex.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer n1 and the Euclidean norm function u(x)=x.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

For x0, Du(x)=x/x, so Du(x)=1.

givenalgebra
1.2

Along a unit vector e, the directional quotients at zero are u(te)/t=1 for t>0 and u(te)/t=1 for t<0.

givenalgebra
2.1

They have no common limit, so u is not differentiable at zero and cannot be classical there.

step 1.2given
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Characteristic initial data need not determine a fully nonlinear solution

Statement refuted

Characteristic initial data always determine a unique local fully nonlinear classical solution.

Counterexample

Given: The equation F(x,y,z,px,py)=px2=0 and data u(x,0)=0.

Proof technique: direct.

1.1

Here Fp=(2px,0)=0 on F=0, so [Fp,Dγ] has rank 1<2 for γ(y)=(y,0).

givenalgebra
1.2

Every u(x,y)=f(y) with f(0)=0 has ux=0, hence solves F=0 and attains the data.

givenalgebra
2.1

Choosing distinct such f gives distinct local solutions, and step 1.1 identifies the failed rank hypothesis.

step 1.1step 1.2construct
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Cauchy–Kovalevskaya normal form with analytic data

Example

For analytic g0,g1, the wave equation utt=uxx with u(0,x)=g0(x) and ut(0,x)=g1(x) is a second-order analytic Cauchy problem in normal form. This checks its hypotheses only; it does not invoke a recorded theorem.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Analytic functions g0,g1 and the wave equation utt=uxx.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The equation is solved for the second normal derivative: utt=uxx, whose right side is analytic in the relevant jet variables.

givenalgebra
2.1

The normal line is t, and the data supply exactly t0ut=0=g0 and tut=0=g1, the orders 0 and 1 required for order 2.

step 1.1given
3.1

The coefficient of utt is 1, so t=0 is noncharacteristic for this solved normal form.

step 1.1algebra
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Quadratic Hamilton–Jacobi data produce an explicit caustic time

Example

For ut+(ux)2/2=0 with u0(ξ)=ξ2/2, the characteristic map is X(t,ξ)=(1t)ξ. Its first caustic time is 1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Hamiltonian H(p)=p2/2 and initial momentum p0(ξ)=ξ.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Since Hx=0, the momentum equation gives p˙=0, hence p(t,ξ)=ξ.

givenalgebra
2.1

As X˙=Hp(p)=p, integration from X(0,ξ)=ξ gives X=(1t)ξ.

step 1.1givenalgebra
3.1

Xξ=1t is nonzero for t<1 and zero at t=1, which is the first caustic by the stated convention.

step 2.1given
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Smooth nonanalytic transport data give a smooth nonanalytic solution

Example

Let g(x)=e1/x2 for x0 and g(0)=0. The transport solution u(t,x)=g(xt) is smooth but not analytic at each point x=t.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The displayed flat function g and u(t,x)=g(xt).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Every derivative of g at 0 is 0, while g(x)>0 for x0; thus g is C but cannot equal its Taylor series near 0.

givenalgebra
1.2

The chain rule gives ut=g(xt) and ux=g(xt), hence ut+ux=0 and u(0,x)=g(x).

givenalgebra
2.1

Translation carries the flat nonanalytic point from 0 to x=t, so u is nonanalytic there despite being smooth.

step 1.1step 1.2given

Sources