How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Continuity alone does not give uniqueness: through the origin
Statement refuted
Let be continuous. Then for every the initial value problem , has at most one solution on every interval containing .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The field and the initial value problem , .
A solution on an interval is a differentiable with for every and (First-order systems, initial value problems, and solutions on intervals, The derivative of at a point that is a limit point of , and differentiability on a set). [given]
and (on ) are continuous, and sums, products and compositions of continuous functions are continuous; squaring is continuous by the polynomial clause of Sums, scalar multiples, products, absolute values, maxima, minima and quotients with nonvanishing denominator of continuous functions are continuous, as are constants, the identity and every polynomial function, injective on by Squaring is monotone on the nonnegatives, and onto by Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are , so is its continuous inverse on (Absolute value in an ordered field, Continuous inverse theorem: a continuous injective on an interval is a bijection onto the order-convex set , and the inverse is continuous and strictly monotone in the same sense as , Sums, scalar multiples, products, absolute values, maxima, minima and quotients with nonvanishing denominator of continuous functions are continuous, as are constants, the identity and every polynomial function, A composite of continuous functions is continuous, with no side hypothesis of the kind the composition of limits needs, Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point). [given]
, and the chain rule and algebra of derivatives differentiate compositions, products and sums (For a natural the function is differentiable everywhere with derivative ; for it is the constant , with derivative ; for a natural the function is differentiable at every with derivative ; consequently every polynomial function is differentiable at every real, with the derivative computed term by term, The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ). [given]
Counterexample
The map is continuous on as the composition of with the square root, by [L2], so the hypothesis of the refuted statement holds.
The zero function is a solution: it is differentiable with derivative everywhere.
Define by for and for . Then is continuous, and it is differentiable at with derivative from both sides: for , , while the left difference quotient is . For the derivative is (for ) or (for ) by [L3]. Hence is differentiable on with .
For , and , so uniqueness of the nonnegative square root in [L2] gives ; for , and . Hence is a solution of through by [L1], and it differs from the zero solution on : the initial value problem has two distinct solutions on every interval containing , refuting the statement.
Remarks
- Why the Lipschitz hypothesis matters. The local uniqueness lemma Continuous and Lipschitz dependence on the initial condition on a Picard-Lindelof cylinder assumes a state-Lipschitz constant; here fails that hypothesis at the equilibrium: as . The counterexample shows that continuity alone cannot replace it, so the Lipschitz hypothesis in the oscillator existence and uniqueness results is not redundant.
- No physical claim. This is a statement about an abstract scalar ODE; it makes no assertion about any mechanical model.
Depends on
First-order systems, initial value problems, and solutions on intervals
Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point
Continuous and Lipschitz dependence on the initial condition on a Picard-Lindelof cylinder
Sums, scalar multiples, products, absolute values, maxima, minima and quotients with nonvanishing denominator of continuous functions are continuous, as are constants, the identity and every polynomial function
A composite of continuous functions is continuous, with no side hypothesis of the kind the composition of limits needs
Continuous inverse theorem: a continuous injective on an interval is a bijection onto the order-convex set , and the inverse is continuous and strictly monotone in the same sense as
Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are
Squaring is monotone on the nonnegatives
Absolute value in an ordered field
For a natural the function is differentiable everywhere with derivative ; for it is the constant , with derivative ; for a natural the function is differentiable at every with derivative ; consequently every polynomial function is differentiable at every real, with the derivative computed term by term
The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with
Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when
The derivative of at a point that is a limit point of , and differentiability on a set
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- G. Teschl, Ordinary Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (AMS Graduate Studies in Mathematics 140, online edition), Section 2.2 (the Picard iteration and the role of the Lipschitz hypothesis; examples of nonunique solutions), printed pages 25-32
- J. Arino, MATH 8430 Fundamental Theory of Ordinary Differential Equations (University of Manitoba), Section 1.2 (existence and uniqueness statements and the necessity of a Lipschitz condition), printed pages 12-21