How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A free label: a nonempty regular common level set of a completely integrable datum that is noncompact and has no period lattice
A counterexample in the autonomous zero-force one-label presentation on R6: the smooth three-integral datum F=(H,p1,p2) on p3>0 has connected regular fibres diffeomorphic to R3, hence noncompact. Its commuting R3 action has trivial stabilizer, so no full period lattice exists, and the physical Hamiltonian flow has no nonzero period. This is declared model data, with no measured value or apparatus claim.
Statement refuted
In a completely integrable datum of a presentation of the framework's force branch, every nonempty regular common level set of the integral map is compact, and along it the datum's Hamiltonian flow is periodic with a full lattice of periods.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The one-label model of Adopted force model: force maps, the equation of motion, additive composition of force contributions and frame covariance with the zero force map, presented by the potential and (Potential presentations of a force model, potential and mechanical energy, closed versus exact force fields, local potentials and equipotential level sets, The action functional of a force model with a potential presentation: the mechanical Lagrangian, its chart instance and its dimensions): configuration domain , time window , mass and no interactions. Its presentation is hyperregular with the Cartesian phase domain and branch Hamiltonian (Every potential presentation is hyperregular in its charts, with inverse branch (or ) and the explicit kinetic-plus-potential Hamiltonian, The Hamiltonian of a hyperregular potential presentation: the Legendre transform of the mechanical Lagrangian, its domain and its dimensions, The momentum of a potential presentation: the fibre derivative of the mechanical Lagrangian, the Cartesian momentum Mv and generalized momenta, The Euclidean inner product on ).
Datum and fields (Completely integrable data of a declared presentation: smooth phase functions with , pairwise in involution and independent on the regular locus, First integrals of the model's Hamiltonian and families in involution: the bracket criterion and differential independence, The Hamiltonian field of a phase function for a potential presentation: the unique field with , and for the branch Hamiltonian): on the open phase domain take . All three functions are smooth and depend only on , so their pairwise brackets vanish. Their momentum derivatives are the rows , and , with determinant . Thus the regular locus is all of . The fields are , and .
Regular fibres: for and set and . The common fibre of at is exactly . It is nonempty, connected and regular at every point, and the projection to is a smooth diffeomorphism to .
Compactness and continuity (Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right, A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value, Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point, The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement): a continuous real function on a compact metric space attains its maximum; the coordinate function on is continuous.
The torus and lattice conclusion (Compact connected regular fibres of a completely integrable datum of the presentation are Lagrangian tori with a full period lattice clauses 2 and 3): compactness of the fibre is a hypothesis there for the completeness of the restricted fields, for the full period lattice and for the torus identification; the item asserts no conclusion for a noncompact level set.
Counterexample
By [L1], is a completely integrable datum with on the six-dimensional domain . By [L2], is a nonempty connected regular common fibre.
Use fixed SI numerical coordinates for the physical quantities, as in Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework. Give the flow parameters the dimensions and : is the Hamiltonian time parameter, while are position-translation parameters for the momentum integrals. With these units each summand in the displacement has length dimension. On the commuting fields have the globally defined joint action . In these fixed numerical units the translation matrix has determinant , so it is transitive and its stabilizer is at every point. There is therefore no full rank-three period lattice. In particular the physical Hamiltonian flow has no nonzero period since .
The continuous coordinate takes every real value on , at points . If were compact, [L3] would make this coordinate bounded. Thus is noncompact.
The compactness hypothesis in [L4] fails, while connectedness and regularity hold. Thus the qualified torus and action-angle conclusions remain consistent, and the refuted conclusion without compactness fails inside the declared free model.
Remarks
-
What is refuted. Only the version of the fibre claims without the compactness hypothesis. The qualified theorem Compact connected regular fibres of a completely integrable datum of the presentation are Lagrangian tori with a full period lattice keeps that hypothesis, and its conclusion that compact connected regular fibres are tori remains untouched.
-
The model reading. The free presentation is a legitimate model of the force branch with zero force; the counterexample is a statement about that declared model and carries no measured value and no claim about any apparatus.
Depends on
Completely integrable data of a declared presentation: smooth phase functions with , pairwise in involution and independent on the regular locus
First integrals of the model's Hamiltonian and families in involution: the bracket criterion and differential independence
Compact connected regular fibres of a completely integrable datum of the presentation are Lagrangian tori with a full period lattice
The Hamiltonian of a hyperregular potential presentation: the Legendre transform of the mechanical Lagrangian, its domain and its dimensions
Every potential presentation is hyperregular in its charts, with inverse branch (or ) and the explicit kinetic-plus-potential Hamiltonian
The momentum of a potential presentation: the fibre derivative of the mechanical Lagrangian, the Cartesian momentum Mv and generalized momenta
The Hamiltonian field of a phase function for a potential presentation: the unique field with , and for the branch Hamiltonian
Cartesian model motions on the potential branch and declared generalized-coordinate Lagrange equations integrate their Hamiltonian fields; the forced Cartesian field is Hamiltonian exactly when the residual force has a velocity-independent potential
The action functional of a force model with a potential presentation: the mechanical Lagrangian, its chart instance and its dimensions
Potential presentations of a force model, potential and mechanical energy, closed versus exact force fields, local potentials and equipotential level sets
Adopted force model: force maps, the equation of motion, additive composition of force contributions and frame covariance
The associated first-order system, motions, maximal motions and the Newtonian flow of a force model
Configuration domain of labeled particles: open admissible sets, regular holonomic constraints and the mass operator
Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework
A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value
Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right
Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point
The Euclidean inner product on
Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms
Linear independence: a finite list is independent when forces every , and a subset is independent when every injective finite list into is independent
The rank of a derivative and constant-rank Euclidean maps
The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement
Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length
Action-angle coordinates of a completely integrable presentation: period-one angles, action coordinates, and linear motion on the tori
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- Ana Cannas da Silva, Lectures on Symplectic Geometry (revised January 2006), Lecture 18, Theorem 18.12, pp. 110-111: the torus and period-lattice conclusions for compact connected regular fibres
- Eckhard Meinrenken, Symplectic Geometry (University of Toronto lecture notes), Chapter 6, Propositions 6.10-6.11, pp. 68-69: the full-lattice stabilizer conclusion and its compactness hypothesis
- D. Tong, Classical Dynamics (Cambridge lecture notes, January 2015 printing), Section 1.2, printed pages 3-4 (PDF pages 9-10): the statement that in an inertial frame a free particle travels in a straight line $r=r_0+vt$, and the conservation of momentum when the force vanishes