Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cartesian model motions on the potential branch and declared generalized-coordinate Lagrange equations integrate their Hamiltonian fields; the forced Cartesian field is Hamiltonian exactly when the residual force has a velocity-independent potential

Physical scope

The identification of the model's Hamiltonian evolution with the integral curves of the presentation's Hamiltonian field: on the potential branch the model's motions, the solutions of Hamilton's equations for the branch Hamiltonian and the integral curves of XH coincide, and in a declared generalized-coordinate chart the declared Lagrange equations coincide with the corresponding Hamilton system; with residual forces the momentum equation carries the force as a source, and the forced field is Hamiltonian exactly when that source derives from a velocity-independent potential. The statement is a conditional deduction from the adopted force branch, the declared presentation and the cited mathematics; it makes no existence, uniqueness, completeness or empirical claim.

Statement

Adopt the force model with potential presentation (U,d) and mechanical Lagrangian L=K−U of The action functional of a force model with a potential presentation: the mechanical Lagrangian, its chart instance and its dimensions with the data, charts and Hamiltonian field of The canonical one-form and the two-form of a potential presentation: λ=p⋅dx on the Cartesian momentum phase chart and the induced forms on each generalized-coordinate chart, The Hamiltonian field of a phase function for a potential presentation: the unique field Xf with ιXfω=df, and XH=(Hp,−Hx) for the branch Hamiltonian: masses m1,…,mN>0 and open configuration domain Q⊆R3N with mass operator M (Configuration domain of N labeled particles: open admissible sets, regular holonomic constraints and the mass operator), time window I0, C2 potential U and residual forces d of the standing regularity (Potential presentations of a force model, potential and mechanical energy, closed versus exact force fields, local potentials and equipotential level sets, Adopted force model: force maps, the equation of motion, additive composition of force contributions and frame covariance, Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework), the Cartesian Hamiltonian H(t,x,p)=12p⋅M−1p+U(t,x) and, for a generalized-coordinate map X:Ω→Q with kinetic metric G=DXTM DX, the chart Hamiltonian H~(t,q,P)=12P⋅G(q)−1P+U~(t,q) (The Hamiltonian of a hyperregular potential presentation: the Legendre transform of the mechanical Lagrangian, its domain and its dimensions, Every potential presentation is hyperregular in its charts, with inverse branch v=M−1p (or G(q)−1p) and the explicit kinetic-plus-potential Hamiltonian, Generalized-coordinate maps of the model, the substituted Lagrangian, the kinetic metric and generalized forces, The momentum of a potential presentation: the fibre derivative of the mechanical Lagrangian, the Cartesian momentum Mv and generalized momenta). Let J⊆I0 be a nonempty open interval. For clause 4, a time-dependent phase function is a map f:I0×W→R of class C2; write ft(z):=f(t,z) and use The Hamiltonian field of a phase function for a potential presentation: the unique field Xf with ιXfω=df, and XH=(Hp,−Hx) for the branch Hamiltonian to define the associated family of Hamiltonian fields t↦Xft. The forced field is called Hamiltonian on this full chart when it equals Xft for every t∈I0. Then:

  1. (potential branch, Cartesian chart) Assume d≡0 on the state domain. For a C2 curve x:J→Q with p(t):=Mx′(t) the following are equivalent: (a) x is a motion of the model (The associated first-order system, motions, maximal motions and the Newtonian flow of a force model); (b) x˙(t)=Hp(t,x(t),p(t)) and p˙(t)=−Hx(t,x(t),p(t)) for every t∈J; (c) the curve t↦(x(t),p(t)) is an integral curve of the time-dependent field t↦XHt, i.e. satisfies z˙(t)=XHt(z(t)) with z=(x,p) (First-order systems, initial value problems, and solutions on intervals).
  2. (generalized-coordinate chart) Let X:Ω→Q be a generalized-coordinate map and let q:J→Ω be a C2 curve with x:=X∘q and P(t):=G(q(t))q′(t). Then the declared Lagrange equations with residual generalized force, Λ(L~)(q)(t)=Qres(t,q(t),q′(t)), are equivalent to q′(t)=H~P(t,q(t),P(t)) and P′(t)=−H~q(t,q(t),P(t))+Qres(t,q(t),q′(t)); in particular, when d≡0, they are equivalent to (q,P) being an integral curve of XH~t.
  3. (residual forces, Cartesian chart) For a C2 curve x:J→Q with p=Mx′, the model's forced equation Mx′′=−∇xU(t,x)+d(t,x,x′) holds on J if and only if x˙=Hp and p˙=−Hx+d(t,x,M−1p) on J.
  4. (when is the forced field Hamiltonian?) The forced field (x,p)↦(M−1p,−∇xU(t,x)+d(t,x,M−1p)) is Hamiltonian in the preceding time-dependent sense if and only if there is a C2 function V:I0×Q→R with d(t,x,v)=−∇xV(t,x) for every (t,x,v) of the state domain; in that case the phase function is H+V up to an independently chosen additive C2 function of t on each connected component of Q, and the model's forced motions are the motions of the potential presentation (U+V,0).

The statement is conditional on the adopted force branch, the declared presentation and the declared chart; it asserts no existence or uniqueness of solutions, no completeness, no conservation law and no empirical content.

Facts & Assumptions

[F2]

Branch Hamiltonians and equivalence (Every potential presentation is hyperregular in its charts, with inverse branch v=M−1p (or G(q)−1p) and the explicit kinetic-plus-potential Hamiltonian, The Hamiltonian of a hyperregular potential presentation: the Legendre transform of the mechanical Lagrangian, its domain and its dimensions, Hamilton's equations of the mechanical presentation are equivalent to the model's equation of motion, with residual forces as momentum sources and the coordinate form on every chart, The momentum of a potential presentation: the fibre derivative of the mechanical Lagrangian, the Cartesian momentum Mv and generalized momenta, Generalized-coordinate maps of the model, the substituted Lagrangian, the kinetic metric and generalized forces): the presentation is hyperregular on both charts with H(t,x,p)=12p⋅M−1p+U(t,x), Hp=M−1p, Hx=∇xU, and H~(t,q,P)=12P⋅G(q)−1P+U~(t,q); when d≡0, the model's motions with p=Mx′ are exactly the solutions of Hamilton's equations of H, the forced equation is exactly Hamilton's equations with the residual force added to the momentum source, and in a generalized-coordinate chart the declared Lagrange equations are equivalent to the Hamilton system of H~ with residual generalized force Qres.

[F3]

Hamiltonian fields (The Hamiltonian field of a phase function for a potential presentation: the unique field Xf with ιXfω=df, and XH=(Hp,−Hx) for the branch Hamiltonian, The two-form of a potential presentation is closed and nondegenerate, and each generalized-coordinate momentum chart carries the same symplectic structure: ΦX∗λ=∑Pa dqa and ΦX∗ω=∑dqa∧dPa, The Hamiltonian field of a C2 function on a phase domain is J∇H, and the Poisson bracket is ∑i(∂qif ∂pig−∂pif ∂qig), The canonical one-form and the two-form of a potential presentation: λ=p⋅dx on the Cartesian momentum phase chart and the induced forms on each generalized-coordinate chart): for each t, Ht is a C2 phase function and XHt is the unique C1 field with ιXHtω=dHt; in the Cartesian and generalized-coordinate charts its components are (Hp,−Hx) and (H~P,−H~q). For a joint C2 phase function f:I0×W→R, each frozen-time function ft is C2 and has the field Xft defined in The Hamiltonian field of a phase function for a potential presentation: the unique field Xf with ιXfω=df, and XH=(Hp,−Hx) for the branch Hamiltonian; a solution of the time-dependent field is a curve satisfying z˙(t)=XHt(z(t)).

Proof

technique · direct. Read the displayed field of [F3] as the Hamilton system of [F2], transfer the equivalence theorem [F2] to the field language, and settle clause 4 by comparing the two components of the forced field with a Hamiltonian field
1.1F2F3algebra

By [F3] the field of the branch Hamiltonian is XHt(z)=(Hp(t,z),−Hx(t,z)), and by [F2] these entries are M−1p and −∇xU(t,x); hence for a C1 curve z=(x,p) the identity z˙(t)=XHt(z(t)) is literally the system of clause 1(b), and clauses 1(b) and 1(c) are the same statement.

1.2F2given

By [F2] the equivalence theorem for the potential branch states that x is a motion if and only if (x,p) with p=Mx′ satisfies Hamilton's equations of H; this is clauses 1(a) and 1(b).

1.3F2F3algebra

Clause 2: by [F2] the declared Lagrange equations are equivalent to the Hamilton system of H~ with the residual generalized force added, and by [F3] applied in the coordinates X the Hamiltonian entries are H~P and −H~q, so that system is exactly the system displayed in clause 2; when d≡0 it is the integral-curve equation of XH~t.

1.4F2algebra

Clause 3: the forced equation Mx′′=−∇xU(t,x)+d(t,x,x′) with p=Mx′ is, by [F2], equivalent to x˙=Hp together with p˙=−Hx+d(t,x,M−1p), since p˙=Mx′′ and Hp=M−1p=x′; this is the claim.

1.5F2F3F4algebra

Clause 4, sufficiency: if d(t,x,v)=−∇xV(t,x) with V of class C2, then f:=H+V belongs to C2(I0×W) by [F4] and its frozen-time Hamiltonian fields have components fp=M−1p and −fx=−∇xU−∇xV=−∇xU+d, which is the forced field; adding an independently chosen C2 function of t on each connected component of Q changes neither spatial nor momentum gradient and gives the same field.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2

Clause 1: step 1.2 identifies clauses 1(a) and 1(b), and step 1.1 identifies clauses 1(b) and 1(c); hence all three are equivalent.

2.2step 1.5F1F2F4algebra

Clause 4, necessity: suppose the forced field equals Xft for some f∈C2(I0×W). Comparing first components gives fp(t,x,p)=M−1p, so ∇p(f−12p⋅M−1p)=0; for each fixed (t,x) the map p↦f(t,x,p)−12p⋅M−1p has vanishing total derivative on the convex open set R3N, so by [F4] it is constant, and evaluating at p=0 gives f(t,x,p)=12p⋅M−1p+g(t,x) with g(t,x):=f(t,x,0) of class C2 by [F4]; comparing second components gives −∇xU+d=−∇xg, hence d(t,x,v)=−∇x(g−U)(t,x) for every state, so the asserted velocity-independent potential is V:=g−U. For any fixed admissible V, two phase functions producing this same field have difference with both spatial and momentum gradients zero; by the componentwise constancy argument of Potential presentations of a force model, potential and mechanical energy, closed versus exact force fields, local potentials and equipotential level sets clause (c), that difference is a C2 function of t on each connected component of Q×R3N, namely each C×R3N; the model's forced equation is then Mx′′=−∇x(U+V)(t,x), the equation of the potential presentation with potential U+V and vanishing residual forces.

3.1step 2.1step 1.3step 1.4step 1.5step 2.2∎

Collecting: clause 1 is step 2.1, clause 2 is step 1.3, clause 3 is step 1.4, and clause 4 follows from steps 1.5 and 2.2 in the two directions; this proves the statement.

Remarks

  • No solution theory is asserted. The theorem compares three descriptions of the same first-order equations; existence, uniqueness and maximal domains of solutions are provided separately by the model's initial-value theory and by the ordinary ODE theory used on the later items of this page.

  • Why clause 4 matters. It delimits the model's Hamiltonian branch: a residual force contributes a Hamiltonian field only when it derives from a potential independent of the velocity slot, which is why the flow and volume-preservation items below state the potential branch explicitly.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources