Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Hamiltonian field of a C2 function on a phase domain is J∇H, and the Poisson bracket is ∑i(∂qif ∂pig−∂pif ∂qig)

Statement

Let n≥1, let U be a phase domain with standard two-form ωU=∑idqi∧dpi (A phase domain, its canonical one-form and its standard symplectic two-form), and let H:U→R be of class C2 (Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms). Write ∇H=(Hq1,…,Hqn,Hp1,…,Hpn) for the Euclidean gradient (The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case) and J for the standard symplectic matrix. Then:

  1. there is exactly one C1 vector field XH on U with ιXHωU=dH, and it is XH=J∇H=(Hp1,…,Hpn,−Hq1,…,−Hqn);
  2. an integral curve t↦(q(t),p(t)) of XH satisfies Hamilton's equations q˙i=Hpi(q,p),p˙i=−Hqi(q,p)(i=1,…,n);
  3. for f,g∈C2(U) the Poisson bracket {f,g}:=ωU(Xf,Xg) (in the finite-regularity convention of Finite-regularity differential forms, Hamiltonian fields and canonical maps in phase charts) is {f,g}=∇fTJ ∇g=∑i=1n(fqigpi−fpigqi), hence {f,g}=−{g,f}, and {f,g} is C1 on U.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The phase domain U, the C2 function H, and the C2 functions f,g on U (A phase domain, its canonical one-form and its standard symplectic two-form, Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms).

[F1]

Contraction formula and block identities: for v=(a,b) one has ιvωz=∑iai dpi−∑ibi dqi, and JT=−J, J2=−I2n (The standard two-form of a phase domain is closed and nondegenerate, with contraction ιvω=∑iai dpi−∑ibi dqi).

[F3]

A Hamiltonian vector field is a vector field X with ιXω=dH for a smooth function H, and the Poisson bracket is {F,G}=ω(XF,XG) (Hamiltonian vector field and Hamiltonian function, Poisson bracket on a symplectic manifold). For the present C2 functions the field and bracket mean the explicitly defined finite-regularity coordinate objects of Finite-regularity differential forms, Hamiltonian fields and canonical maps in phase charts, with the same sign convention; the imported smooth definitions are used only in the smooth subcase.

Proof

technique · direct; compare coefficients in the coordinate bases and use the block identities for the bracket formula
1.1F1F2F4algebra

Existence: define XH:=J∇H, whose components are C1 because H is C2; by [F1] and [F2], ιXHωU=∑i(J∇H)i dpi−∑i(J∇H)n+i dqi with (J∇H)i=Hpi and (J∇H)n+i=−Hqi, i.e. ιXHωU=dH; in particular XH=J∇H has the displayed components.

1.2F1

Uniqueness: if X,Y are C1 fields with ιXωU=dH=ιYωU, then ιX−YωU=0; by [F1] the map v↦ιvωz is injective at every z, so X−Y=0 pointwise.

2.1F1F3step 1.1algebra

Hamilton's equations and the bracket: an integral curve of XH solves z˙=XH(z), which in coordinates is q˙i=Hpi and p˙i=−Hqi, proving clause 2. For f,g∈C2(U), step 1.1 applied to each function and [F1] give ωU(Xf,Xg)=(J∇f)TJ(J∇g)=∇fTJTJ2∇g=∇fTJ∇g. The last expression is the coordinate bracket defined in [F3], and block multiplication expands it to ∑i(fqigpi−fpigqi). Thus its equality with ωU(Xf,Xg) is established directly, without assuming that equality for nonsmooth inputs.

3.1step 2.1F1algebra∎

Skew symmetry and regularity: swapping f and g in the coordinate formula negates every summand because JT=−J, so {f,g}=−{g,f}; the coordinate expression is a sum of products of C1 partial derivatives, hence is C1.

Remarks

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources