Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite-regularity differential forms, Hamiltonian fields and canonical maps in phase charts

Definition

Let U,V⊆R2n be phase domains with standard forms and matrix J of A phase domain, its canonical one-form and its standard symplectic two-form. All finite differentiability classes and diffeomorphisms use Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms.

On any open set O⊆Rm, a Ck coordinate differential form, k≥0, is a sum ∑i1<⋯<ijai1⋯ij(z) dzi1∧⋯∧dzij with Ck coefficient functions. Its value at a point is the indicated alternating multilinear form on Rm. For k≥1 define its exterior derivative by the coordinate formula d(a dzi1∧⋯ )=∑l(∂la) dzl∧dzi1∧⋯, extended linearly. For a C1 map C:U→V, the pointwise pullback is (C∗η)z(v1,…,vj):=ηC(z)(DC(z)v1,…,DC(z)vj). It is a continuous form when η is continuous; no assertion that this pullback is smooth is part of the definition. Wedges and contractions are the pointwise alternating multilinear operations. Thus the finite-regularity identities below can be read without applying a definition restricted to smooth forms or maps.

A Cr canonical map, 1≤r≤∞, is a Cr map C:U→V satisfying C∗ωV=ωU pointwise. A Cr canonical transformation is such a map that is a Cr diffeomorphism onto V; a local Cr canonical transformation is a Cr local diffeomorphism satisfying the same equality. The C∞ case agrees with Canonical transformation and Symplectomorphisms, local symplectomorphisms, and symplectic embeddings; the finite-r terminology on this page is the definition just given, and does not assert that a C1 map is smooth.

For h∈C2(U) the coordinate Hamiltonian field is the C1 vector-valued map Xh:=J∇h, viewed as a field by the canonical identification TzU=R2n. Its characterization by ιXhωU=dh is proved in The Hamiltonian field of a C2 function on a phase domain is J∇H, and the Poisson bracket is ∑i(∂qif ∂pig−∂pif ∂qig) ↗. For f,g∈C1(U) define the coordinate Poisson bracket by {f,g}:=∇fTJ∇g; for C2 inputs it is C1 and equals ωU(Xf,Xg) by that proposition. Smooth inputs recover the smooth symplectic conventions. No closure of the C2 class under this bracket is assumed.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources