Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A divergence-free current with nonzero flux through a timelike 3-simplex

Statement refuted

Statement refuted: "Let M=R4 carry the flat metric g=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1), the identity chart and the chart orientation, and let J be a smooth vector field on M with ∇aJa=0 on M (The metric volume form, current flux through 3-faces and finite-chain charges, A smooth vector field is a smooth section of the tangent bundle). Then the flux ΦJ(σ) of J through every smooth singular 3-simplex σ of M vanishes."

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The flat Lorentzian four-manifold (R4,g) with identity chart, g=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1), chart orientation, metric-selected connection ∇ and metric volume form volg; the vector field J=∂1; and the affine smooth singular 3-simplex σ of the standard 3-simplex Δ3={(t1,t2,t3):ti≥0, ∑iti≤1} into the plane x1=0, σ(t1,t2,t3):=(t1,0,t2,t3).

[L2]

The flux of J through a smooth singular 3-simplex σ — the affine map of the Facts, a special case of the simplex convention restated in The metric volume form, current flux through 3-faces and finite-chain charges clause (b) (library definition def-smooth-singular-simplex) — is ΦJ(σ)=∫σιJvolg=∫Δ3σ∗(ιJvolg), and the integral is the ordinary multiple integral of the pullback coefficient (The metric volume form, current flux through 3-faces and finite-chain charges clause (b), Integral of a form over a smooth singular simplex).

[L3]

For a non-null face with velocity basis (v1,v2,v3) and adapted unit normal ν∗ (so that (ν∗,v1,v2,v3) is positively oriented, g(ν∗,ν∗)=ε and ν∗⊥span⁡(v1,v2,v3)), the pullback of ιJvolg on (v1,v2,v3) equals εg(J,ν∗)∣det⁡(g(vi,vj))∣ (Divergence, Stokes flux balance and the non-null face formula for a Lorentzian current clause (c), Chart independence of the metric volume form, its value on orthonormal frames, and the unit normal and density of a non-null hyperplane).

[L4]

Using the simplex-integral zero-extension convention on [0,1]3, the indicator sections are integrable interval indicators; Riemann--Fubini on product rectangles, with lower and upper section integrals and content-zero exceptional sections identifies their repeated integrals with the multiple integral. The standard 3-simplex Δ3 has volume 1/6: the iterated integral ∫01 ⁣∫01−t1 ⁣∫01−t1−t2dt3 dt2 dt1=∫01(1−t1)22dt1=16 evaluates by the fundamental theorem of calculus; hence the integral of a constant c over Δ3 is c/6 (The lower and upper Darboux integrals of a bounded f on [a,b] as sup⁡PL(f,P) and inf⁡PU(f,P), Darboux integrability as their equality, and the notation ∫abf, The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a), Integral of a form over a smooth singular simplex).

Counterexample

Let J:=∂1 on M=R4 and let σ be the affine simplex of the Facts.

1.1L1algebra

(The current is divergence-free.) By [L1], ∇aJa=∂aJa=∂1(1)=0: J satisfies the hypothesis of the refuted statement.

1.2L1algebra

(The adapted normal.) The velocity vectors of σ are v1=∂0, v2=∂2, v3=∂3, spanning the hyperplane H={v1=0}, which is nondegenerate (it is the g-orthogonal complement of the spacelike vector ∂1). The vector ν∗:=−∂1 lies in H⊥, has g(ν∗,ν∗)=1, and the ordered basis (−∂1,∂0,∂2,∂3) has determinant −det⁡(∂1,∂0,∂2,∂3)=+1 in the identity chart, so (ν∗,v1,v2,v3) is positively oriented: ν∗ is the adapted unit normal.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2L2L3L4algebra

(The flux.) By [L3] with ε=g(ν∗,ν∗)=1, g(J,ν∗)=g(∂1,−∂1)=−1 and det⁡(g(vi,vj))=det⁡diag⁡(−1,1,1)=−1, so ∣det⁡(g(vi,vj))∣=1 and the pullback σ∗(ιJvolg) is the constant scalar coefficient εg(J,ν∗)⋅1=−1 times dt1∧dt2∧dt3. By [L2] and [L4], ΦJ(σ)=∫Δ3(−1) dt1dt2dt3=−16≠0.

3.1step 2.1algebra∎

(Conclusion.) The field J=∂1 is divergence-free on M, yet its flux through the smooth singular 3-simplex σ is −1/6, not zero. Hence the displayed statement is refuted: divergence-freedom is a differential condition on J, while the flux through a single face depends on the face and its orientation.

Remarks

  • Consistency with the flux theorem. The counterexample does not contradict the balance identity of Divergence, Stokes flux balance and the non-null face formula for a Lorentzian current: for a 4-chain whose boundary contains σ and an opposite face, the two fluxes differ by the side flux, and the identity is a statement about that difference, not about the vanishing of each term.

  • Choice of orientation. Had the simplex been oriented with the opposite normal, the flux would be +1/6; the nonzero value is independent of this sign convention.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources