Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A time-dependent Lagrangian chart, its action functional and its fixed-endpoint first variations

Definition

Chart data. Let n≥1, let a<b be reals and let U⊆Rn be open and nonempty. Let O⊆R×Rn×Rn be an open set with

[a,b]×U×Rn⊆O,

and let L:O→R be of class C2 (Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms). The pair (O,L) is a time-dependent Lagrangian chart over [a,b]×U. The three slots of L are written (t,q,v), so that t is the time, q the configuration and v the velocity; the open set O has the three coordinate blocks of sizes 1,n,n.

Admissible curves and variations. A map q:[a,b]→U is of class C2 when there are ε>0 and a C2 map q~:(a−ε,b+ε)→Rn with q~∣[a,b]=q and q~(t)∈U for every t∈[a,b]; the derivative q′ and the second derivative q′′ below are those of any such extension, and they are independent of the extension on [a,b]. A variation of a C2 curve q is a map η:[a,b]→Rn of class C2 in the same sense with

η(a)=η(b)=0.

Thus the admissible curves and variations are the restrictions to [a,b] of C2 maps on a common open interval. This closed-interval extension convention is stipulated here; on the open interval each component has continuous derivatives through order two in the sense of Ck maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space.

The action. For a C2 curve q:[a,b]→U the map t↦L(t,q(t),q′(t)) is continuous on [a,b], because q,q′ are continuous and L is continuous (The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral); it is therefore Darboux integrable (The lower and upper Darboux integrals of a bounded f on [a,b] as sup⁡PL(f,P) and inf⁡PU(f,P), Darboux integrability as their equality, and the notation ∫abf). The action of q is the real number

S(q):=∫abL(t,q(t),q′(t)) dt.

First variation. For a C2 curve q and a variation η the curve qε:=q+εη takes values in U for all sufficiently small ∣ε∣; this is proved in The first variation of a time-dependent action on a finite interval: admissibility, the integral formula and continuity of the Euler-Lagrange coefficient ↗ and is not part of the present definition. The first variation of S at q in the direction η is the ordinary two-sided derivative at ε=0 of the function ε↦S(q+εη), written

δS(q)[η]:=ddε∣ε=0S(q+εη),

whenever this derivative exists; The first variation of a time-dependent action on a finite interval: admissibility, the integral formula and continuity of the Euler-Lagrange coefficient ↗ proves that it does exist under the present hypotheses and computes it, so the notation denotes a single real number for every pair (q,η) arising here.

Euler–Lagrange expression. Let Lq(t,q,v)∈Rn and Lv(t,q,v)∈Rn be the gradients of L in the second and third slots (The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case, Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆Rm→Rn). Since L is C2, the maps t↦Lv(t,q(t),q′(t)) are C1 and t↦Lq(t,q(t),q′(t)) is continuous on [a,b]. The Euler–Lagrange expression of L along q is the continuous map

EL(q)(t):=Lq(t,q(t),q′(t))−ddt(Lv(t,q(t),q′(t)))∈Rn.

Stationarity. A C2 curve q is stationary for S when

δS(q)[η]=0for every variation η.

Scope. The definition introduces only chart data, the action and its first variation. It asserts nothing about minimising S, nothing about the existence of stationary curves and nothing about any physical interpretation of L; the equivalence of stationarity with the vanishing of EL(q) is the theorem Stationarity of the time-dependent action is equivalent to the vanishing of the Euler-Lagrange expression, and the distinction between stationary and minimising curves is recorded in Scope of stationarity: stationary is not minimum, and no second-variation theory is developed here.

Remarks

  • The Lagrangian is allowed to depend on t, which is what makes the chart suitable for systems with prescribed time-dependent constraints, moving frames or external drifts; the chart formulation with the extension convention above is the one used by the consuming classical mechanics pages.

  • If U=Rn and L is the restriction of a C2 function on R×Rn×Rn, then O may be taken to be all of R1+2n and no extension discussion is needed. The general formulation keeps O open so that the Legendre map of The Legendre map of a time-dependent Lagrangian: regularity and hyperregularity can be studied on the same domain.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources