Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The first variation of a time-dependent action on a finite interval: admissibility, the integral formula and continuity of the Euler-Lagrange coefficient

Statement

Let (O,L) be a time-dependent Lagrangian chart over [a,b]×U in the sense of A time-dependent Lagrangian chart, its action functional and its fixed-endpoint first variations, let q:[a,b]→U be a C2 admissible curve and let η be a variation of q. Then:

  1. there is ε0>0 such that for every ε∈(−ε0,ε0) the curve q+εη is again a C2 admissible curve with values in U;
  2. for every such ε the action S(q+εη) is defined, the function ε↦S(q+εη) is differentiable on (−ε0,ε0) and

δS(q)[η]=∫ab[Lq(t,q(t),q′(t))⋅η(t)+Lv(t,q(t),q′(t))⋅η′(t)]dt;

  1. the Euler–Lagrange expression EL(q):[a,b]→Rn of A time-dependent Lagrangian chart, its action functional and its fixed-endpoint first variations is continuous.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The chart data (O,L) with O open satisfying [a,b]×U×Rn⊆O, a C2 curve q:[a,b]→U, and a C2 variation η with η(a)=η(b)=0. Write ψ(ε,t):=(t,q(t)+εη(t),q′(t)+εη′(t)).

[F1]

The set [a,b]⊆R is compact by Heine-Borel in Rn: with the Euclidean metric a subset of Rn is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line (it is closed and bounded), the curve q is continuous on [a,b], and a continuous image of a compact set is compact (The image of a compact metric space under a continuous map is compact, and so is the image of any compact subset); hence q[a,b]⊆U is a nonempty compact subset. If U≠Rn, then the complement Rn∖U is a nonempty closed set disjoint from q[a,b], and A compact set and a disjoint closed set have a positive norm-distance gap supplies d>0 with ∥q(t)−c∥2≥d for all t∈[a,b] and all c∉U.

[F2]

The continuous function η:[a,b]→Rn attains a maximum of ∥η(t)∥2 (A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value); write mη:=max⁡t∈[a,b]∥η(t)∥2≥0.

[F3]

The map ψ is continuous on R×[a,b] and is continuously partially differentiable in ε, with ∂ψ∂ε(ε,t)=(0,η(t),η′(t)), because η is C1; hence ψ is totally differentiable in (ε,t) with the displayed derivatives and the derivative depends continuously on (ε,t) (The total (Fréchet) derivative Df(a) as the linear first-order approximation with o(∥h∥2) remainder, If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative, Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case).

[F4]

The chain rule computes the derivative of a composite through the total derivatives (The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a)). In particular, if g(ε,t):=L(ψ(ε,t)) on the domain where ψ takes values in O, then ∂g∂ε(ε,t)=Lq(ψ(ε,t))⋅η(t)+Lv(ψ(ε,t))⋅η′(t), which is continuous in (ε,t) because Lq,Lv,η,η′ are continuous and ψ is continuous.

[F5]

Differentiation under the integral sign on a compact rectangle (Leibniz's rule on a compact rectangle: an interior parameter derivative with a continuous extension may be passed through a Riemann integral): if g,h:[α,β]×[a,b]→R are continuous and for each fixed t the map ε↦g(ε,t) is differentiable on (α,β) with derivative h(ε,t), then ε↦∫abg(ε,t) dt has derivative ∫abh(ε,t) dt at every ε∈[α,β].

Proof

Proof technique: direct; trap the curve in a positive distance shell of U, then differentiate under the integral on a compact rectangle.

1.1givenF3

Clause 1, the case U=Rn: take ε0:=1; then for every ε∈(−1,1) the map q+εη is C2 by the algebra of C2 maps on an open interval and takes values in Rn=U.

1.2F1F2algebra

Clause 1, the case U≠Rn: by [F1] choose d>0 with ∥q(t)−c∥2≥d for all t∈[a,b] and all c∉U, and by [F2] put mη:=max⁡∥η∥2. If mη=0 then η=0 identically and ε0:=1 works. Otherwise take ε0:=d/(2mη). For ∣ε∣<ε0 and t∈[a,b], ∥q(t)+εη(t)−q(t)∥2=∣ε∣ ∥η(t)∥2<d/2<d, so if q(t)+εη(t) were outside U, the distance from q(t) to the complement would be <d, contradicting the choice of d. Hence q+εη takes values in U; it is C2 by the algebra of C2 maps. This proves clause 1.

2.1F3F4F5F6step 1.2algebra

Clause 2: fix 0<δ<ε0 and consider R:=[−δ,δ]×[a,b]; by clause 1, ψ(R)⊆{(t,x,w):(t,x,w)∈O}, so g(ε,t):=L(ψ(ε,t)) is defined and continuous on R. By [F3], [F4] the partial derivative h:=∂g/∂ε exists and is continuous on R, and for each fixed t it is the derivative of ε↦g(ε,t). Hence [F5] applies and gives ddε∫abg(ε,t) dt=∫abh(ε,t) dt(∣ε∣≤δ). Evaluating at ε=0 and inserting the description of h from [F4] gives the displayed formula for δS(q)[η].

3.1F3F4givenalgebra∎

Clause 3: the map t↦ψ(0,t)=(t,q(t),q′(t)) is C1 on an open interval around [a,b] and takes values in O; since Lv is C1, the composite t↦Lv(t,q(t),q′(t)) is C1 by the chain rule, with continuous derivative because the derivative is a composite of continuous maps; and t↦Lq(t,q(t),q′(t)) is continuous. The difference EL(q) of these two continuous maps is continuous.

Remarks

  • The formula is stated for the chartwise finite-interval setting. The autonomous smooth version on a manifold, where the same computation is performed in every coordinate chart and assembled by a partition argument, is the published theorem on the Hamiltonian-mechanics page of the differential-geometry track; the present statement is the one needed when the Lagrangian depends explicitly on time and C2 data on a fixed interval are used.

  • Only the differentiability of ε↦S(q+εη) at ε=0 is used later. The proof establishes differentiability on the whole small interval, which is the natural output of the compact-rectangle theorem.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources