Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicable
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The steady-current (magnetostatic) regime, the compact smooth current class and the declared ideal noncompact models

Physical scope

A model restriction inside the classical electromagnetic framework: the steady-current regime is the time-independent reduction of the adopted Maxwell equations in one inertial frame, and the compact smooth current class and the three declared ideal models are hypotheses, not measurements or empirical findings. The ideal noncompact models carry declared symmetry and decay data and have no finite-energy or compact-support property; no experiment, apparatus, uncertainty or statistical claim is involved, and no claim is made that any real current is exactly steady, compactly supported or divergence-free.

Definition

For the Lebesgue/surface/distributional source and admissibility branches (c)-(d), assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). The smooth formulation in (a) and the smooth conserved-current predicate in (b) do not themselves use Choice. Let the laboratory region and its chart, the field and source objects and the units be those of Laboratory geometry: a restricted inertial chart, its spatial slices and fixed-time fields, The electric and magnetic fields as fixed-time spatial vector fields, Charge parameter, frame charge and current densities, volume charge and flux, and the four-current and Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values, and fix μ0>0, c>0, ε0=(μ0c2)−1.

(a) [Steady-current regime]. A steady-current (magnetostatic) configuration on Ω×I consists of a field pair E,B:Ω×I→R3 and source fields ρ:Ω×I→R, J:Ω×I→R3 that are independent of t and satisfy the smooth branch of The microscopic vacuum Maxwell equations: smooth and weak branches with the operators of Divergence and curl of a C1 vector field and Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆Rm→Rn. For such a configuration the formal distributional branch of Charge continuity as a compatibility condition of the vacuum Maxwell equations gives div⁡J=0 distributionally; this is pointwise when J is C1. In the jointly C2 field/C1 source branch its classical proof applies directly. The locally integrable distributional reading here inherits Countable Choice, whereas the stated classical C2/C1 compatibility calculation is choice-free, and the four adopted equations are equivalent to the electrostatic pair and the magnetostatic pair div⁡E=ρ/ε0,curl⁡E=0,div⁡B=0,curl⁡B=μ0J.

(b) [Compact smooth current class]. The compact smooth current class of this framework consists of the currents J∈Cc∞(Ω;R3) with div⁡J=0, extended by zero to R3. A magnetostatic field of such a current is a field B of class C1 on R3 satisfying div⁡B=0 and curl⁡B=μ0J on R3 with the extended J. This is the hypothesis class of the vector-potential, Biot-Savart and dipole theorems of this page; this definition asserts neither existence nor uniqueness of B in the class.

(c) [Ideal source objects]. Define three ideal current source objects outside the compact class, together with the data selecting their fields. Curve parameters s and L and the radius a carry metres; the signed line-current amplitude I carries amperes and the signed sheet-current amplitude K carries A m−1. The field B carries tesla, as in Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values.

(c1) [Closed thin loop]. For a closed embedded C2 curve γ:R/LZ→R3 with ∣γ′∣≡1 (L>0) and I∈R, the ideal loop current is the distribution ⟨Jγ,ψ⟩:=I∫0Lγ′(s)⋅ψ(γ(s)) ds,ψ∈Cc∞(R3;R3), with ργ:=0.

(c2) [Infinite straight wire]. For γ(s)=(0,0,s), s∈R, and I∈R, the ideal wire current is ⟨Jw,ψ⟩:=I∫Rψ3(0,0,s) ds, with ρw:=0.

(c3) [Infinite cylindrical sheet]. For a>0, S={ρ=a}, ρ=x12+x22, eρ:=ρ−1(x1,x2,0) and eφ:=ρ−1(−x2,x1,0) on {ρ>0}, and K∈R, the ideal solenoid sheet current is ⟨JS,ψ⟩:=K∫Seφ⋅ψ dS (Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces, read on compact cylinder segments), with ρS:=0. All three pairings are finite because ψ has compact support.

(c4) [Admissibility]. A field B is admitted for one of these declared models when: B is locally integrable on R3 (hence a distribution by Regular distribution from a locally integrable function, Locally integrable functions embed in distributions) and C1 off the support of the current; div⁡B=0 and curl⁡B=0 hold pointwise off that support; the distributional identities div⁡B=0 and curl⁡B=μ0J hold against every scalar divergence test φ∈Cc∞(R3) and vector curl test ψ∈Cc∞(R3;R3) in the sense of Distributional derivative; B has the model's declared symmetry: in (c2) and (c3), B(x+he3)=B(x) for every h∈R, and B(Rθx)=RθB(x) for every θ∈R, at off-source points, where Rθ(x1,x2,x3)=(x1cos⁡θ−x2sin⁡θ,x1sin⁡θ+x2cos⁡θ,x3); no symmetry is required in (c1); and B obeys the decay requirement: ∣B(x)∣→0 as ∣x∣→∞ in (c1), and in (c2), (c3), sup⁡(θ,z)∈C∣B(rcos⁡θ,rsin⁡θ,z)∣→0 as r→∞ for every nonempty compact C⊂R2. The companion examples exhibit and verify the fields of the two axisymmetric models in this class; the definition itself asserts no existence, uniqueness, finite energy or limiting relation for the declared models, and no compact-class theorem of this page applies to them.

(d) [Scope]. This is a model restriction: the steady-current regime for compact smooth currents, and three explicitly declared ideal noncompact or singular models. It excludes point charges, weaker-regularity volume sources, moving sheets, normal sheet currents and any claim of empirical exactness; the equations in (c4) define a mathematical admissibility predicate; its physical adoption for these source objects is a separate postulate, and no product of distributions is formed.

Remarks

Well-definedness of the clauses. In (c1)-(c3) the pairings are order-zero continuous linear functionals on the test spaces of Test function space d of an open set: on a fixed compact test support their absolute values are bounded by ∣I∣L∥ψ∥∞, by ∣I∣ times the finite length of the axis projection times ∥ψ∥∞, and by ∣K∣ times the finite area of a containing compact cylindrical face times ∥ψ∥∞, respectively. The cylinder chart X(θ,z)=(acos⁡θ,asin⁡θ,z) has Gram density a, and finitely many angular charts cover each compact face, so the surface pairing is the chart-defined integral of Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces; the scalar triple product and the direction eφ are those of The cross product in R3. The divergence pairing uses scalar tests and the curl pairing vector tests under Distributional derivative, a vector distribution being a triple of scalar distributions in D′(R3) of Distribution; a locally integrable field is a distribution in the sense of the regular-distribution embedding Regular distribution from a locally integrable function, Locally integrable functions embed in distributions. Smoothness statements use Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms. The finite area of a compact angular face is the Riemann integral of the constant function one over its rectangular chart domain, with the properties of Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in Rm. The declared ideal objects lie outside the source classes of Distributional Maxwell equations with point and stationary-sheet sources: that definition excludes line and noncompact sheet currents, so no equation for these singular objects is inherited from it, and Countable Choice is inherited only through the compact-face surface and regular-distribution interfaces.

Source notes

Griffiths, Section 5.2.1, printed pp. 215-216, and the opening of Tong, Chapter 3, printed pp. 41-42, describe steady currents and the reduction to ∇⋅J=0 and the static field equations; Griffiths, Section 5.1.3, printed pp. 208-214, supplies the line, surface and volume current-density conventions reproduced in (c). Landau-Lifshitz, Section 43, printed pp. 101-103, and Chew, Lecture 4 Section 4.1, printed pp. 39-41, give the constant-field equations and the vector-potential formulation in the same regime. The ideal noncompact models are declared modelling hypotheses of this framework, not measurements or exact descriptions of any apparatus.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources